Literature DB >> 21487141

Relationship between accelerometer-determined steps/day and other accelerometer outputs in US adults.

Catrine Tudor-Locke1, William D Johnson, Peter T Katzmarzyk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) accelerometer-determined steps/day and activity counts/day, and between steps/day and estimates of nonwear time (as an indicator of the unmonitored day) and time spent in sedentary behaviors as well as a range of physical activity intensities.
METHODS: Linear regression models were used to characterize the relationship between steps/day, activity counts/day, estimates of wear time, and intensity categories.
RESULTS: 1781 males (mean age = 46.5 years) and 1963 females (mean age = 47.7 years) wore accelerometers 14.0 ± SEM0.06 hours/day. The relationship between steps/day and activity counts/day was positive and strong (R2 = .87). The relationship between steps/day and time spent in sedentary behaviors was inverse and moderate (R2 = .25). Stronger and positive relationships were apparent between steps/day and time in light (R2 = .69) and moderate (R2 = .63) intensity activities. There was no discernable relationship between steps/day and time spent in low or vigorous intensity activities or with wear time.
CONCLUSIONS: Assessed by accelerometer, steps/day explains 87% of the variation in activity counts/day, 25% of the variation in time in sedentary behaviors, 69% of time in light intensity, and 63% of time in moderate intensity.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21487141     DOI: 10.1123/jpah.8.3.410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Act Health        ISSN: 1543-3080


  15 in total

1.  Different associations of routine work time with exercise behavior and objectively measured physical activity among middle-aged and older adults: a daily and longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Harada; Kouhei Masumoto; Narihiko Kondo
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2019-05-10

2.  Accelerometer Assessment of Physical Activity and Its Association with Physical Function in Older Adults Residing at Assisted Care Facilities.

Authors:  M P Corcoran; K K H Chui; D K White; K F Reid; D Kirn; M E Nelson; J M Sacheck; S C Folta; R A Fielding
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 3.  Instrument selection for randomized controlled trials: why this and not that?

Authors:  Kathie Records; Colleen Keller; Barbara Ainsworth; Paska Permana
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Multiple imputation of completely missing repeated measures data within person from a complex sample: application to accelerometer data in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Benmei Liu; Mandi Yu; Barry I Graubard; Richard P Troiano; Nathaniel Schenker
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Step-Based Physical Activity Metrics and Cardiometabolic Risk: NHANES 2005-2006.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; John M Schuna; H O Han; Elroy J Aguiar; Michael A Green; Michael A Busa; Sandra Larrivee; William D Johnson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  A catalog of rules, variables, and definitions applied to accelerometer data in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2006.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Sarah M Camhi; Richard P Troiano
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 7.  How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Cora L Craig; Yukitoshi Aoyagi; Rhonda C Bell; Karen A Croteau; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Ben Ewald; Andrew W Gardner; Yoshiro Hatano; Lesley D Lutes; Sandra M Matsudo; Farah A Ramirez-Marrero; Laura Q Rogers; David A Rowe; Michael D Schmidt; Mark A Tully; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 8.  How many steps/day are enough? For adults.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Cora L Craig; Wendy J Brown; Stacy A Clemes; Katrien De Cocker; Billie Giles-Corti; Yoshiro Hatano; Shigeru Inoue; Sandra M Matsudo; Nanette Mutrie; Jean-Michel Oppert; David A Rowe; Michael D Schmidt; Grant M Schofield; John C Spence; Pedro J Teixeira; Mark A Tully; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Validity of the Fitbit activity tracker for measuring steps in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Serene S Paul; Anne Tiedemann; Leanne M Hassett; Elisabeth Ramsay; Catherine Kirkham; Sakina Chagpar; Catherine Sherrington
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2015-07-08

10.  Associations between seasonal meteorological conditions and the daily step count of adults in Yokohama, Japan: Results of year-round pedometer measurements in a large population.

Authors:  Kimihiro Hino; Jung Su Lee; Yasushi Asami
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2017-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.