Literature DB >> 21486975

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of alternative schedules of HPV vaccine in Vietnam: a cluster randomized noninferiority trial.

Kathleen M Neuzil1, Do Gia Canh, Vu Dinh Thiem, Amynah Janmohamed, Vu Minh Huong, Yuxiao Tang, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Diep, Vivien Tsu, D Scott LaMontagne.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine programs may decrease the morbidity and mortality due to cervical cancer seen among women in low-resource countries. However, the 3-dose schedule over a 6-month period is a potential barrier to vaccine introduction in such settings.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of different dosing schedules of quadrivalent HPV vaccine in adolescent girls in Vietnam. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Open-label, cluster randomized, noninferiority study (conducted between October 2007 and January 2010) assessing 4 schedules of an HPV vaccine delivered in 21 schools to 903 adolescent girls (aged 11-13 years at enrollment) living in northwestern Vietnam. INTERVENTION: Intramuscular injection of 3 doses of quadrivalent HPV vaccine delivered on a standard dosing schedule (at 0, 2, and 6 months) and 3 alternative dosing schedules (at 0, 3, and 9 months; at 0, 6, and 12 months; or at 0, 12, and 24 months). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum anti-HPV geometric mean titers (GMT) measured 1 month after the third dose of the HPV vaccine was administered; GMT was determined by type-specific competitive immunoassay. Noninferiority of each alternative vaccination dosing schedule was achieved if the lower bound of the multiplicity-adjusted confidence interval (CI) of the type-specific GMT ratio for HPV-16 and HPV-18 was greater than 0.5 (primary outcome). Safety outcomes were immediate reactions, local reactions, fever within 7 days after each dose, and serious adverse events up to 30 days following the last dose.
RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, 809 girls who received at least 1 HPV vaccine dose had valid serum measurements 1 month after the third dose. After the third dose, the GMTs for those in the standard schedule group who received doses at 0, 2, and 6 months were 5808.0 (95% CI, 4961.4-6799.0) for HPV-16 and 1729.9 (95% CI, 1504.0-1989.7) for HPV-18; 5368.5 (95% CI, 4632.4-6221.5) and 1502.3 (95% CI, 1302.1-1733.2), respectively, for those whose received doses at 0, 3, and 9 months; 5716.4 (95% CI, 4876.7-6700.6) and 1581.5 (95% CI, 1363.4-1834.6), respectively, for those who received doses at 0, 6, and 12 months; and 3692.5 (95% CI, 3145.3-4334.9) and 1335.7 (95% CI, 1191.6-1497.3), respectively, for those who received doses at 0, 12, and 24 months. Noninferiority criteria were met for the alternative schedule groups that received doses at 0, 3, and 9 months (HPV-16 GMT ratio: 0.92 [95% CI, 0.71-1.20]; HPV-18 GMT ratio: 0.87 [95% CI, 0.68-1.11]) and at 0, 6, and 12 months (HPV-16 GMT ratio: 0.98 [95% CI, 0.75-1.29]; HPV-18 GMT ratio: 0.91 [95% CI, 0.71-1.17]). Prespecified noninferiority criteria were not met for the alternative schedule group that received doses at 0, 12, and 24 months (HPV-16 GMT ratio: 0.64 [95% CI, 0.48-0.84]; HPV-18 GMT ratio: 0.77 [95% CI, 0.62-0.96]). Pain at the injection site was the most common adverse event.
CONCLUSIONS: Among adolescent girls in Vietnam, administration of the HPV vaccine on standard and alternative schedules was immunogenic and well tolerated. The use of 2 alternative dosing schedules (at 0, 3, and 9 months and at 0, 6, and 12 months) compared with a standard schedule (at 0, 2, and 6 months) did not result in inferior antibody concentrations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00524745.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21486975     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  31 in total

1.  Randomized trial of HPV4 vaccine assessing the response to HPV4 vaccine in two schedules among Peruvian female sex workers.

Authors:  Brandon Brown; Magaly Blas; Alejandra Cabral; Cesar Carcamo; Patti Gravitt; Neal Halsey
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Effectiveness of decision support for families, clinicians, or both on HPV vaccine receipt.

Authors:  Alexander G Fiks; Robert W Grundmeier; Stephanie Mayne; Lihai Song; Kristen Feemster; Dean Karavite; Cayce C Hughes; James Massey; Ron Keren; Louis M Bell; Richard Wasserman; A Russell Localio
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  The road ahead for cervical cancer prevention and control.

Authors:  J E Tota; A V Ramana-Kumar; Z El-Khatib; E L Franco
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Risk of Delayed Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Inner-City Adolescent Women.

Authors:  Nicolas F Schlecht; Angela Diaz; Viswanathan Shankar; Arnold H Szporn; Maoxin Wu; Anne Nucci-Sack; Ken Peake; Howard D Strickler; Robert D Burk
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Vaccination against HPV-Associated Neoplasias: Recommendations from the Current S3 Guideline of the HPV Management Forum of the Paul-Ehrlich Society - AWMF Guidelines, Registry No. 082-002 (short version), valid until Dec. 31st, 2018.

Authors:  G Gross; N Becker; N H Brockmeyer; S Esser; U Freitag; M Gebhardt; L Gissmann; P Hillemanns; H Grundhewer; H Ikenberg; H Jessen; A Kaufmann; S Klug; J P Klußmann; A Nast; D Pathirana; K U Petry; H Pfister; U Röllinghof; P Schneede; A Schneider; E Selka; S Singer; S Smola; B Sporbeck; M von Knebel Doeberitz; P Wutzler
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Evaluation of the immunogenicity of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine using 2 versus 3 doses at month 21: An epidemiological surveillance mechanism for alternate vaccination schemes.

Authors:  Mauricio Hernández-Ávila; Leticia Torres-Ibarra; Margaret Stanley; Jorge Salmerón; Aurelio Cruz-Valdez; Nubia Muñoz; Rolando Herrero; Ignacio F Villaseñor-Ruíz; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Alternative dosage schedules with HPV virus-like particle vaccines.

Authors:  Margaret A Stanley; Staci L Sudenga; Anna R Giuliano
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.217

8.  Ethical tradeoffs in trial design: case study of an HPV vaccine trial in HIV-infected adolescent girls in lower income settings.

Authors:  J C Lindsey; S K Shah; G K Siberry; P Jean-Philippe; M J Levin
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.294

Review 9.  Safety of human papillomavirus vaccines: a review.

Authors:  Kristine K Macartney; Clayton Chiu; Melina Georgousakis; Julia M L Brotherton
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Comparison of different human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine types and dose schedules for prevention of HPV-related disease in females and males.

Authors:  Hanna Bergman; Brian S Buckley; Gemma Villanueva; Jennifer Petkovic; Chantelle Garritty; Vittoria Lutje; Alina Ximena Riveros-Balta; Nicola Low; Nicholas Henschke
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.