| Literature DB >> 21486452 |
Jen-Pan Huang1, Chung-Ping Lin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pleistocene glacial oscillations have significantly affected the historical population dynamics of temperate taxa. However, the general effects of recent climatic changes on the evolutionary history and genetic structure of extant subtropical species remain poorly understood. In the present study, phylogeographic and historical demographic analyses based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences were used. The aim was to investigate whether Pleistocene climatic cycles, paleo-drainages or mountain vicariance of Taiwan shaped the evolutionary diversification of a subtropical gossamer-wing damselfly, Euphaea formosa.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21486452 PMCID: PMC3094233 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-94
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Pleistocene river drainages of Taiwan, sampling localities and the species tree for . (A). The proposed paleo-drainage systems of Minjiang on the continental shelf during the glacial period approximately 15,000 years ago [9]. (B) Present major river systems and mountain ranges of Taiwan, including the 32 sampling sites (in numbers) used in this study. The black triangles represent mountain peaks over 3,000 meters. (C) The species tree, divergence time and population size (θ = N) of E. formosa jointly estimated with COII and ITS in *BEAST. Numbers above the branches represent the Bayesian Posterior Probability (BPP). The grey bars near the nodes are 95% HPD of divergence time estimates.
Figure 2Phylogenetic relationships between . (A) COII trees (lnL=-2276). (B) ITS trees (lnL=-3225). Numbers near the nodes are support values of the Maximum Parsimony (MP) bootstrap (above), Maximum Likelihood (ML) bootstrap (lower left) and Bayesian Posterior Probability (BPP) (lower right). Nodes without support values have values below 50%. Abbreviations of the haplotypes and sampling localities are listed in Additional file 1.
Population genetic statistics among E. formosa damselfly populations of the major phylogenetic lineages and all samples combined.
| Clade | n | nh | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 136 | 28 | 0.657 | 0.003 | -2.465*** | -28.441*** | 12.96 | 0.037 | |
| North-Central | 23 | 22 | 0.996 | 0.021 | 0.450 | -11.974** | 9.93 | 0.051 |
| Total | 159 | 51 | 0.754 | 0.015 | -1.172 | -20.191*** | 0.73 | 0.407 |
| 122 | 82 | 0.962 | 0.005 | -2.717*** | -24.592*** | 9.26 | 0.026 |
n, sample size; nh, number of haplotype; h, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; D, Tajima's D; FS, Fu's FS; Nm, number of effective migrants; FST, fixation index; **P < 0.001; ***P < 0.0001.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) with distribution of genetic variation among populations of E. formosa.
| Gene | Source of variation | Sum of squares | % of variation | Fixation index (Φ) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among groups (East & West) | 1 | 28.290 | 7.65 | 0.07648 | |
| Among populations Within groups | 30 | 237.639 | 25.92 | 0.28061*** | |
| Within populations | 135 | 354.855 | 66.44 | 0.33563*** | |
| Among groups (East, South, & North-Central) | 2 | 50.293 | 8.42 | 0.08421 | |
| Among populations Within groups | 29 | 215.637 | 24.10 | 0.26311*** | |
| Within populations | 135 | 354.855 | 67.48 | 0.32517*** | |
| Among groups (East & West) | 1 | 2.443 | -1.06 | -0.01061 | |
| Among populations Within groups | 29 | 134.604 | 3.21 | 0.03174 | |
| Within populations | 94 | 385.785 | 97.85 | 0.02146 | |
| Among groups (East, South, & North-Central) | 2 | 8.882 | -0.13 | -0.00128 | |
| Among populations Within groups | 28 | 128.165 | 2.83 | 0.02827 | |
| Within populations | 94 | 385.785 | 97.30 | 0.02703 | |
***P < 0.0001
Figure 3Mismatch distributions and Bayesian demographic analyses of . (A) The North-central clade has a multimodal distribution that differs from sudden demographic and spatial expansion models. (B) The widespread clade exhibits a distinct unimodal distribution. (C) The EBSP of the North-central clade demonstrates relatively stationary populations between 0.6 and 2 Mys, with a demographic expansion over much of the Pleistocene glacial cycles. (D) The EBSP of the widespread clade indicates a population growth beginning near the end of the glacial Würm period (0.03 Mya) and into the Holocene interglacial period.