Literature DB >> 21486312

Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire.

Karen M Douglas1, Robbie M Sutton.   

Abstract

We advance a new account of why people endorse conspiracy theories, arguing that individuals use the social-cognitive tool of projection when making social judgements about others. In two studies, we found that individuals were more likely to endorse conspiracy theories if they thought they would be willing, personally, to participate in the alleged conspiracies. Study 1 established an association between conspiracy beliefs and personal willingness to conspire, which fully mediated a relationship between Machiavellianism and conspiracy beliefs. In Study 2, participants primed with their own morality were less inclined than controls to endorse conspiracy theories - a finding fully mediated by personal willingness to conspire. These results suggest that some people think 'they conspired' because they think 'I would conspire'. ©2011 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21486312     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0144-6665


  25 in total

1.  Perceptual Biases in Relation to Paranormal and Conspiracy Beliefs.

Authors:  Michiel van Elk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Intention seekers: conspiracist ideation and biased attributions of intentionality.

Authors:  Robert Brotherton; Christopher C French
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Online communication as a window to conspiracist worldviews.

Authors:  Michael J Wood; Karen M Douglas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-17

4.  An examination of the factorial and convergent validity of four measures of conspiracist ideation, with recommendations for researchers.

Authors:  Viren Swami; David Barron; Laura Weis; Martin Voracek; Stefan Stieger; Adrian Furnham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Recursive fury: conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation.

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; John Cook; Klaus Oberauer; Michael Marriott
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-18

6.  Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: the generic conspiracist beliefs scale.

Authors:  Robert Brotherton; Christopher C French; Alan D Pickering
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-21

7.  The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science.

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; Gilles E Gignac; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  "What about building 7?" A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories.

Authors:  Michael J Wood; Karen M Douglas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-08

9.  The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions.

Authors:  Daniel Jolley; Karen M Douglas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Beyond "Monologicality"? Exploring Conspiracist Worldviews.

Authors:  Bradley Franks; Adrian Bangerter; Martin W Bauer; Matthew Hall; Mark C Noort
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.