BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Statins, a major component of the prevention of cardiovascular disease, aid progenitor cell functions in vivo and in vitro. Statins bearing a NO-releasing moiety were developed for their enhanced anti-inflammatory/anti-thrombotic properties. Here, we investigated if the NO-donating atorvastatin (NCX 547) improved the functions of circulating angiogenic cells (CACs). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Circulating angiogenic cells (CACs) were prepared from peripheral blood monocytes of healthy volunteers and type-2 diabetic patients and were cultured in low (LG) or high glucose (HG) conditions, in presence of atorvastatin or NCX 547 (both at 0.1 µM) or vehicle. Functional assays (outgrowth, proliferation, viability, senescence and apoptosis) were performed in presence of the endothelial NOS inhibitor L-NIO, the NO scavenger c-PTIO or vehicle. KEY RESULTS: Culturing in HG conditions lowered NO in CACs, inhibited outgrowth, proliferation, viability and migration, and induced cell senescence and apoptosis. NCX 547 fully restored NO levels and functions of HG-cultured CACs, while atorvastatin prevented only apoptosis in CACs. The activity of Akt, a pro-survival kinase, was increased by atorvastatin in LG-cultured but not in HG-cultured CACs, whereas NCX 547 increased Akt activity in both conditions. L-NIO partially blunted and c-PTIO prevented NCX 547-induced improvements in CAC functions. Finally, NCX 547 improved outgrowth and migration of CACs prepared from patients with type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: NCX 547 was more effective than atorvastatin in preserving functions of CACs. This property adds to the spectrum of favourable actions that would make NO-releasing statins more effective agents for treating cardiovascular disease.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Statins, a major component of the prevention of cardiovascular disease, aid progenitor cell functions in vivo and in vitro. Statins bearing a NO-releasing moiety were developed for their enhanced anti-inflammatory/anti-thrombotic properties. Here, we investigated if the NO-donating atorvastatin (NCX 547) improved the functions of circulating angiogenic cells (CACs). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Circulating angiogenic cells (CACs) were prepared from peripheral blood monocytes of healthy volunteers and type-2 diabeticpatients and were cultured in low (LG) or high glucose (HG) conditions, in presence of atorvastatin or NCX 547 (both at 0.1 µM) or vehicle. Functional assays (outgrowth, proliferation, viability, senescence and apoptosis) were performed in presence of the endothelial NOS inhibitor L-NIO, the NO scavenger c-PTIO or vehicle. KEY RESULTS: Culturing in HG conditions lowered NO in CACs, inhibited outgrowth, proliferation, viability and migration, and induced cell senescence and apoptosis. NCX 547 fully restored NO levels and functions of HG-cultured CACs, while atorvastatin prevented only apoptosis in CACs. The activity of Akt, a pro-survival kinase, was increased by atorvastatin in LG-cultured but not in HG-cultured CACs, whereas NCX 547 increased Akt activity in both conditions. L-NIO partially blunted and c-PTIO prevented NCX 547-induced improvements in CAC functions. Finally, NCX 547 improved outgrowth and migration of CACs prepared from patients with type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: NCX 547 was more effective than atorvastatin in preserving functions of CACs. This property adds to the spectrum of favourable actions that would make NO-releasing statins more effective agents for treating cardiovascular disease.
Authors: Pier Giovanni Baraldi; Francesca Fruttarolo; Mojgan Aghazadeh Tabrizi; Romeo Romagnoli; Delia Preti; Andrea Bovero; Maria Josè Pineda de Las Infantas; Allan Moorman; Katia Varani; Pier Andrea Borea Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2004-10-21 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Birgit Assmus; Carmen Urbich; Alexandra Aicher; Wolf K Hofmann; Judith Haendeler; Lothar Rössig; Ioakim Spyridopoulos; Andreas M Zeiher; Stefanie Dimmeler Journal: Circ Res Date: 2003-04-03 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Volker Schächinger; Birgit Assmus; Martina B Britten; Jörg Honold; Ralf Lehmann; Claudius Teupe; Nasreddin D Abolmaali; Thomas J Vogl; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Hans Martin; Stefanie Dimmeler; Andreas M Zeiher Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-10-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Alexandra Aicher; Christopher Heeschen; Christiane Mildner-Rihm; Carmen Urbich; Christian Ihling; Katja Technau-Ihling; Andreas M Zeiher; Stefanie Dimmeler Journal: Nat Med Date: 2003-10-12 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Ulf Landmesser; Niels Engberding; Ferdinand H Bahlmann; Arnd Schaefer; Antje Wiencke; Andre Heineke; Stephan Spiekermann; Denise Hilfiker-Kleiner; Christian Templin; Daniel Kotlarz; Maja Mueller; Martin Fuchs; Burkhard Hornig; Hermann Haller; Helmut Drexler Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-10-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Cindy J M Loomans; Eelco J P de Koning; Frank J T Staal; Maarten B Rookmaaker; Caroline Verseyden; Hetty C de Boer; Marianne C Verhaar; Branko Braam; Ton J Rabelink; Anton-Jan van Zonneveld Journal: Diabetes Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Arianne van Koppen; Diana A Papazova; Nynke R Oosterhuis; Hendrik Gremmels; Rachel H Giles; Joost O Fledderus; Jaap A Joles; Marianne C Verhaar Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 6.832
Authors: Ana Catarina Pinho-Gomes; Svetlana Reilly; Ralf P Brandes; Barbara Casadei Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2013-10-19 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Basil S Karam; Alejandro Chavez-Moreno; Wonjoon Koh; Joseph G Akar; Fadi G Akar Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 9.951