Literature DB >> 21484515

Trends in prematurity: what do changes at an urban institution suggest about the public health impact of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate?

Jamie A Bastek1, Joanna E Adamczak, Stacey Hoffman, Michal A Elovitz, Sindhu K Srinivas.   

Abstract

Despite the introduction of 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17P), the national preterm birth (PTB) rate remains unchanged. Our objectives were to determine whether the overall rate of PTB has decreased and whether there has been a shift in the trends of prematurity at our institution since the initiation of 17P use. We performed a cross sectional study of the PTB rate and gestational age distribution at delivery (GA-del) at our institution over two, 2-year time periods: TP1 (pre 17P, 1 Jan 2004-31 Dec 2005) and TP2 (post 17P, 1 Jan 2008-31 Dec 2009). Statistical analyses included χ(2) tests for categorical data, t-tests for continuous data, and multivariable logistic regression to control for confounders. Overall (n = 15,421), there was no difference in the rate of PTB from TP1 to TP2 (16.65 vs 16.95%, p = 0.62). Among those with a history of prior PTB (n = 2,141), the mean preterm GA-del was 10 days later in TP2 than in TP1 (33.13 vs 31.64 weeks, p < 0.01) and significantly more preterm infants in TP2 delivered between 34-36 6/7 weeks than in TP1 (65.00 vs 45.63%, p < 0.01). The odds of a preterm infant delivering in the late preterm period was 2.3-fold higher in TP2 than TP1 (95% CI 1.49-3.54) after controlling for confounders. The significant shift in GA-del towards the late preterm period in TP2 may be due to the introduction of 17P use at our institution. Additional studies are needed to determine whether these trends persist on a nationwide level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21484515     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-011-0783-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  5 in total

1.  ACOG Practice Bulletin. Assessment of risk factors for preterm birth. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 31, October 2001. (Replaces Technical Bulletin number 206, June 1995; Committee Opinion number 172, May 1996; Committee Opinion number 187, September 1997; Committee Opinion number 198, February 1998; and Committee Opinion number 251, January 2001).

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Progestogen administration in pregnancy may prevent preterm delivery.

Authors:  M J Keirse
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1990-02

Review 3.  Classification and heterogeneity of preterm birth.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Moutquin
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Adverse neonatal outcomes: examining the risks between preterm, late preterm, and term infants.

Authors:  Jamie A Bastek; Mary D Sammel; Emmanuelle Paré; Sindhu K Srinivas; Michael A Posencheg; Michal A Elovitz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate.

Authors:  Paul J Meis; Mark Klebanoff; Elizabeth Thom; Mitchell P Dombrowski; Baha Sibai; Atef H Moawad; Catherine Y Spong; John C Hauth; Menachem Miodovnik; Michael W Varner; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Jay D Iams; Ronald J Wapner; Deborah Conway; Mary J O'Sullivan; Marshall Carpenter; Brian Mercer; Susan M Ramin; John M Thorp; Alan M Peaceman; Steven Gabbe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 91.245

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Inequality and Innovation: Barriers and Facilitators to 17P Administration to Prevent Preterm Birth among Medicaid Participants.

Authors:  Caitlin Cross-Barnet; Sarah Benatar; Brigette Courtot; Ian Hill; Emily Johnston; Morgan Cheeks
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-11

2.  Progesterone supplementation and the prevention of preterm birth.

Authors:  Errol R Norwitz; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011

3.  Demystifying animal models of adverse pregnancy outcomes: touching bench and bedside.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Bonney
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.886

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.