Literature DB >> 21484359

A modified visual analogue scale for the assessment of chronic pain.

I Dones1, G Messina, V Nazzi, A Franzini.   

Abstract

The present common evaluation of pain is scored through the use of visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess the intensity of pain and, sometimes, an additional table in which the frequency of pain attacks during the day is reported. We propose a modified 2D-VAS to assess both the intensity and the frequency (expressed by the percentage of the time in which pain is experienced during the day). Thus with only one scale and graphic representation, we can have a clear picture of the patient's condition before and during any treatment to relieve his pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21484359     DOI: 10.1007/s10072-011-0570-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Sci        ISSN: 1590-1874            Impact factor:   3.307


  4 in total

Review 1.  Neurosurgical treatments of intractable pain.

Authors:  Stylianos Nicolaidis
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.694

Review 2.  A systematic review of measures used to assess chronic musculoskeletal pain in clinical and randomized controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Leighann Litcher-Kelly; Sharon A Martino; Joan E Broderick; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 3.  Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales.

Authors:  Amelia Williamson; Barbara Hoggart
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 4.  Drug-resistant primary headache patients undergoing surgical therapies: how should we assess outcomes?

Authors:  Massimo Leone; Angelo Franzini; Alberto Proietti Cecchini; Eliana Mea; Cesare Peccarisi; Vincenzo Tullo; Giovanni Broggi; Gennaro Bussone
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.307

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Is the pain visual analogue scale linear and responsive to change? An exploration using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Paula Kersten; Peter J White; Alan Tennant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Is it possible to objectify the visual pain scale?

Authors:  Mehmet Ergin; Abdullah Sadik Girisgin; Zerrin Defne Dundar; Goknil Saniye Calik; Izzetin Ertas; Mehmet Taskin Egici
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of ultrasound-guided Seldinger peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC).

Authors:  Jianghong Tan; Liping Liu; Jing Xie; Lingli Hu; Qiaolan Yang; Honghong Wang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-12-01

4.  Intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma vs. hyaluronic acid in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Preliminary follow-up results at 6-months.

Authors:  Ming Li; Zheyu Huang; Shicheng Wang; Zhenglin Di; Junhui Zhang; Hua Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Long-Term Follow-Up Safety and Effectiveness of CT-Guided Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation of Sphenopalatine Ganglion in Refractory Headache Treatment.

Authors:  Bingyue Xin; Keyue Xie; Ge Luo; Ming Yao
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2022-07-06

6.  Evaluation of nonspecific low back pain using a new detailed visual analogue scale for patients in motion, standing, and sitting: characterizing nonspecific low back pain in elderly patients.

Authors:  Yasuchika Aoki; Shiro Sugiura; Koichi Nakagawa; Arata Nakajima; Hiroshi Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Satoru Nishikawa
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2012-11-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.