Literature DB >> 21484321

CT angiography helps to differentiate acute from chronic carotid occlusion: the "carotid ring sign".

Patrik Michel1, George Ntaios, Montserrat G Delgado, Daniel C Bezerra, Reto Meuli, Stefano Binaghi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Currently, there is no reliable method to differentiate acute from chronic carotid occlusion. We propose a novel CTA-based method to differentiate acute from chronic carotid occlusions that could potentially aid clinical management of patients.
METHODS: We examined 72 patients with 89 spontaneously occluded extracranial internal carotids with CT angiography (CTA). All occlusions were confirmed by another imaging modality and classified as acute (imaging <1 week of presumed occlusion) orchronic (imaging >4 weeks), based on circumstantial clinical and radiological evidence. A neuroradiologist and a neurologist blinded to clinical information determined the site of occlusion on axial sections of CTA. They also looked for (a) hypodensity in the carotid artery (thrombus), (b) contrast within the carotid wall (vasa vasorum), (c) the site of the occluded carotid, and (d) the "carotid ring sign" (defined as presence of a and/or b).
RESULTS: Of 89 occluded carotids, 24 were excluded because of insufficient circumstantial evidence to determine timing of occlusion, 4 because of insufficient image quality, and 3 because of subacute timing of occlusion. Among the remaining 45 acute and 13 chronic occlusions, inter-rater agreement (kappa) for the site of proximal occlusion was 0.88, 0.45 for distal occlusion, 0.78 for luminal hypodensity, 0.82 for wall contrast, and 0.90 for carotid ring sign. The carotid ring sign had 88.9% sensitivity, 69.2% specificity, and 84.5% accuracy to diagnose acute occlusion.
CONCLUSION: The carotid ring sign helps to differentiate acute from chronic carotid occlusion. If further confirmed, this information may be helpful in studying ischemic symptoms and selecting treatment strategies in patients with carotid occlusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21484321     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-011-0868-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  16 in total

1.  The donut sign on CT angiography: an indicator of reversible intraluminal carotid thrombus?

Authors:  Bijoy K Menon; Jagadeesh Singh; Ali Al-Khataami; Andrew M Demchuk; Mayank Goyal
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Spontaneous and nonspontaneous internal jugular vein thrombosis.

Authors:  K Chowdhury; J Bloom; M J Black; K al-Noury
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Operation for acute completed stroke due to thrombosis of the internal carotid artery.

Authors:  C G Rob
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Endovascular recanalization of internal carotid artery occlusion in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Rebecca M Sugg; Marc D Malkoff; Elizabeth A Noser; Hashem M Shaltoni; Raymond Weir; Edwin D Cacayorin; James C Grotta
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  The Acute STroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne (ASTRAL): design and baseline analysis of an ischemic stroke registry including acute multimodal imaging.

Authors:  Patrik Michel; Céline Odier; Matthieu Rutgers; Marc Reichhart; Philippe Maeder; Reto Meuli; Max Wintermark; Ali Maghraoui; Mohamed Faouzi; Alexandre Croquelois; George Ntaios
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Mechanical thrombectomy of intracranial internal carotid occlusion: pooled results of the MERCI and Multi MERCI Part I trials.

Authors:  Alexander C Flint; Gary R Duckwiler; Ronald F Budzik; David S Liebeskind; Wade S Smith
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Internal carotid artery stent implantation in 25 patients with acute stroke: preliminary results.

Authors:  Krassen Nedeltchev; Caspar Brekenfeld; Luca Remonda; Christoph Ozdoba; Dai-Do Do; Marcel Arnold; Heinrich P Mattle; Gerhard Schroth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Follow-up study on in-stent thrombosis after carotid stenting using multidetector CT angiography.

Authors:  Hirotaka Watarai; Yasuhiko Kaku; Mikito Yamada; Jouji Kokuzawa; Toshiki Tanaka; Takashi Andoh; Toru Iwama
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  [Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs by computed tomography].

Authors:  B Langer; P Kauffman; M Bechara; E T Aguiar; R Aun
Journal:  Rev Paul Med       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug

10.  Clinical and vascular outcome in internal carotid artery versus middle cerebral artery occlusions after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator.

Authors:  Italo Linfante; Rafael H Llinas; Magdy Selim; Claudia Chaves; Sandeep Kumar; Robert A Parker; Louis R Caplan; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management.

Authors:  Konark Malhotra; Nitin Goyal; Georgios Tsivgoulis
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  High-Resolution MRI for Evaluation of the Possibility of Successful Recanalization in Symptomatic Chronic ICA Occlusion: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  M Tang; X Yan; J Gao; L Li; X Zhe; Xin Zhang; F Jiang; J Hu; N Ma; K Ai; Xiaoling Zhang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.966

3.  Current understanding of chronic total occlusion of the internal carotid artery.

Authors:  Baofeng Xu; Chao Li; Yunbao Guo; Kan Xu; Yi Yang; Jinlu Yu
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2017-12-18

4.  Interrater variability for CT angiography evaluation between neurologists and neuroradiologist in acute stroke patients.

Authors:  Michal Bar; Jiri Kral; Tomas Jonszta; Vaclav Marcian; Martin Kuliha; Robert Mikulik
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Vessel wall MR imaging in neuroradiology.

Authors:  Yasutaka Fushimi; Kazumichi Yoshida; Masakazu Okawa; Takakuni Maki; Satoshi Nakajima; Akihiko Sakata; Sachi Okuchi; Takuya Hinoda; Mitsunori Kanagaki; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 6.313

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.