Serum hepatitis B virus DNA before liver transplantation correlates with HBV reinfection rate even under successful low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin prophylaxis.

PURPOSE: The combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and nucleos(t)ide analogues has been accepted as the best treatment to control hepatitis B recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, the optimal dose of HBIg remains unclear. We have previously reported that high-dose HBIg in the early period followed by low-dose HBIg with nucleos(t)ide analogues offers reliable and cost-effective control of hepatitis B recurrence. The aim of this study was to investigate intrahepatic hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection status with our clinically successful protocol.
METHODS: We quantified levels of intrahepatic HBV covalently closed circular (ccc) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and serum hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), a new serological marker that can estimate intrahepatic cccDNA levels. Nucleos(t)ide analogues were administered in all cases.
RESULTS: No patients showed recurrence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or HBV-DNA. However, HBV, cccDNA, and HBcrAg were positive in 57% and 48% of patients after OLT, respectively. Pre-OLT serum HBV-DNA and HBcrAg levels correlated linearly with post-OLT cccDNA levels (r = 0.534, P < 0.05, and r = 0.634, P < 0.05, respectively). High serum HBV-DNA and HBcrAg levels, particularly with >3 log10 copies/mL and >4 log10 IU/mL, respectively, at the time of OLT, were associated with high levels of post-OLT cccDNA. Even with our successful protocol, nearly half of patients showed HBV reinfection.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high serum HBV-DNA and HBcrAg levels before OLT (particularly >3 log10 copies/mL and >4 log10 IU/mL, respectively) should be followed with care for HBV recurrence.

Introduction

Prior to the advent of effective post-transplantation antiviral prophylaxis, liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related disease was usually followed by immediate HBV reinfection of the allograft, resulting in clinical hepatitis B recurrence confirmed by positive results for serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and/or HBV-DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) [1-3]. Recent studies have found that the combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and nucleos(t)ide analogues decreases the risk of HBV recurrence and achieves a higher rate of graft survival [4-8]. However, the optimal dose of HBIg and the target titer for hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) remain unclear. A proposal for guidelines by Roche and Samuel [9] showed that patients with HBV-DNA-positive status before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) need to maintain an anti-HBs titer of 500 IU/L with concomitant use of lamivudine (LAM). However, long-term administration of HBIg is associated with several unresolved issues, including limited availability and extremely high cost, so several arrangements have been reported [8, 10–12]. Low-dose HBIg resulting in a median HBsAb titer of 68 IU/L and combination with high-dose LAM at 300 mg/day has prevented HBsAg recurrence in 96% of cases [12]. Low-dose HBIg administration only when HBsAb titers dropped to <70 IU/L combined with LAM at 100 mg/day has completely prevented HBsAg recurrence [11]. We have already reported that high-dose HBIg in the early period followed by low-dose HBIg with nucleos(t)ide analogues offers reliable, cost-effective control of hepatitis B recurrence [13].

Naïve hepatocytes could be infected by virus release from extrahepatic sites, including the serum. Even after 10 years of successful clinical viral control post-OLT, more than half of patients were reportedly reinfected with the virus as confirmed by HBV covalently closed circular (ccc) DNA positivity of liver biopsy specimens [14]. The risk of clinical HBV recurrence reportedly correlates with high serum viral load pre-OLT. However, rates of reinfection to engrafted hepatocytes and correlations between reinfection and clinical recurrence rates are not well documented. Few reports have confirmed the existence of post-OLT HBV cccDNA, the intrahepatic HBV replication intermediate in infected hepatocytes.

A new assay has recently been developed for detecting hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), consisting of HBV core antigen (HBcAg), HBV e antigen (HBeAg), and a 22-kDa precore protein (p22cr) coded by the precore/core gene [15, 16]. HBcrAg has been reported as a serum marker that could estimate intrahepatic HBV cccDNA [17].

To investigate intrahepatic HBV reinfection status with the clinically successful therapy of short-term high-dose HBIg followed by long-term low-dose HBIg and nucleos(t)ide analogues therapy, we quantified intrahepatic HBV cccDNA and serum HBcrAg.

Materials and methods

Patients and samples

From October 1996 to February 2009, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was performed in 206 patients at Okayama University Hospital. Of these, 34 cases showed HBV-related liver cirrhosis. The overall actual survival rate of patients is shown in Fig. 1. Five-year survival rates were 85% and 84% for all patients and for patients with HBV-related liver cirrhosis, respectively.

Fig. 1

Survival curve. Post-OLT survival of patients with LC(B) was comparable to that of all patients. LC(B), type B liver cirrhosis

Our HBV prophylaxis protocol was as follows. We administered HBIg at 200 IU/kg intraoperatively. Former patients received the same dose for an additional 1 week postoperatively. HBIg was thereafter administered once only at 2,000 IU for HBsAb titers <100 IU/L. After 6 months, HBIg was administered only for HBsAb titers <10 IU/L. We measured HBsAg and HBsAb and/or HBV-DNA every month for 6 months after LDLT and every 2–3 months thereafter. Two of the 34 HBV-related LDLT patients dropped out from our HBV prophylaxis protocol and were thus excluded from this study. The general characteristics of patients included in this study are summarized in Table 1. Patients were treated using a standard immunosuppressive regimen (tacrolimus or cyclosporine A and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil with steroids) and nucleos(t)ide analogues were administered to all patients. Nucleos(t)ide analogues were started a minimum of 1 month preoperatively, as possible.

Table 1

General characteristics of patients

	Total	With explanted liver
Patients	32	12
Age (years)a	51.5 (26–63)	52.5 (44–63)
Gender (male/female)	29/3	11/1
Hepatitis virus, HBV/HBV + HCV	30/2	12/0
Hepatic malignancy	17	7
Donor anti-HBc status (positive/negative)	13/19	7/5
Antiviral prescription pre-OLT
n (%)	32 (100)	12 (100)
Duration (days)a	56 (3–1,793)	163.5 (5–1,793)
Lamivudine/lamivudine + adefovir/entecavir	25/4/3	8/2/2
Characteristics at OLT
Serum HBV-DNA: detectable (%)	57	42
HBV-DNA level in detectable cases (log10 copies/mL)a	4.1 (2.7–5.5)	3.5 (2.7–4.8)
HBV genotype (C/not analyzed)	20/12	9/3
HBeAg status (positive/negative)	15/17	4/8
Immunosuppressant (tacrolimus/cyclosporine A)	26/6	11/1
Duration of post-OLT follow-up (months)a	38 (2–103)	35 (4–53)
Recurrence (presence of serum HBsAg/hepatitis)	0/0	0/0

Post-OLT reinfection with HBV was defined as positivity for any of the following HBV markers: serum HBsAg, serum HBcrAg, serum HBV-DNA, or intrahepatic HBV cccDNA

DNA deoxyribonucleic acid, anti-HBc antibody to hepatitis B core antigen, HBeAg hepatitis B e antigen, HBsAg hepatitis B surface antigen, HBV hepatitis B virus, HCV hepatitis C virus, OLT orthotopic liver transplantation

aMedian (range)

Serum samples and explanted liver and biopsy specimens were obtained from these patients at our hospital after obtaining informed consent. Explanted liver samples were obtained from 12 patients. We performed protocol biopsies at 1, 3, and 5 years after OLT. We explained the necessity of routine liver biopsy to all patients after LDLT, but 19 of the 32 patients did not agree and biopsy specimens were thus obtained from 13 patients. All serum samples were stored at −80°C until analysis.

All study protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee at the Okayama University Hospital.

Routine laboratory tests

HBsAg, HBeAg, HBsAb, and HBeAb were routinely measured using a commercially available chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) system (Lumipulse System; Fujirebio, Tokyo, Japan).

Serum HBcrAg assay

Serum HBcrAg was retrospectively measured using a CLEIA HBcrAg assay kit (Fujirebio) with a fully automated analyzer system (Lumipulse System, Fujirebio). Briefly, serum was mixed with pretreatment solution containing sodium dodecylsulfate and Tween 60, then incubated at 60°C for 30 min. This pretreated serum was added to a well coated with monoclonal antibodies against denatured HBc and HBe antigens. After 10 min of incubation at 37°C, wells were washed with buffer. Alkaline phosphatase-labeled monoclonal antibodies against denatured HBc and HBe antigens were added to the well and incubated for 10 min at 37°C. After washing, substrate solution was added and incubated for 5 min at 37°C. Relative chemiluminescence intensity was measured at 477 nm, and the HBcrAg concentration was determined [15].

Serum HBV-DNA assay

HBV-DNA level was measured using a transcription-mediated amplification assay (TMA) (SRL, Tokyo, Japan), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay (Amplicor HBV Monitor assay; Roche Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan) or real-time PCR assay (COBAS TaqMan HBV Test; Roche Diagnostics).

Measurement of intrahepatic HBV cccDNA and β-globin levels

Liver biopsy specimens were immediately divided into two aliquots. One was formalin fixed for histological diagnosis, and the other was frozen within one minute for DNA analysis. The aliquot for DNA analysis was stored at −80°C until DNA extraction. HBV-DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan).

Intrahepatic cccDNA was retrospectively measured using real-time PCR methods, as described previously [17]. To detect cccDNA, two oligonucleotide primers of HBVcccF1547 (5′-ccccgtctgtgccttctc-3′, nucleotides 1,547–1,564) and HBVcccR1863 (5′-gcacagcttggaggcttgaa-3′, nucleotides 1,882–1,863), and the probe cccP2 (5′-VIC-accaatttatgcctacag-MGB-3′, nucleotides 1,672–1,655) were administered, as described previously, with minor modification [17]. Selective primers for cccDNA amplification were targeted across the single-stranded gap region of relaxed circular (RC) HBV-DNA. To enhance the specificity of cccDNA detection, plasmid-safe DNase (Epicentre, Madison, WI, USA) was used to degrade RC and single-stranded forms of viral DNA prior to PCR. Plasmid-safe DNase treatment of virion-associated DNA prevented amplification, confirming that this DNase degraded RC forms of HBV-DNA [18].

Real-time PCR was performed in a Light-Cycler (Roche Diagnostics). Cycling conditions of the assay were as follows: an initial 10 min at 95°C for DNA polymerase activation, followed by 45 cycles of 15 s denaturation at 95°C, and 90 s annealing and extension at 60°C. A 20-μL reaction volume containing 5 μL of extracted nucleic acid, 0.12 μmol/L of forward and reverse primers, 0.10 μmol/L of probe and 10 μL of LightCycler480 Probes Mater (Roche Diagnostics) was administered. Serial dilutions of a plasmid containing HBV-DNA extracted and cloned from the serum of a 36-year-old Japanese woman (genotype C) served as quantification standards. HBV cccDNA values were normalized for cellular DNA content using a commercially available β-globin gene kit (Roche DNA Control Kit; Roche Diagnostics).

The lower limit of detection for the HBV cccDNA was −4 log10 copies/cell.

Immunohistochemical staining

Immunohistochemical staining was performed on sections of fixed liver tissues using a three-step horseradish peroxidase technique. The primary monoclonal antibodies employed were anti-HBsAg and anti-HBcAg (Dako, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis

Statistical comparisons were performed using JMP version 7.0.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). For nonparametric pair-wise comparisons, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for two-group comparisons. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical tests were two-sided. We performed per protocol analysis.

Results

Clinical course of patients

The 32 patients investigated comprised of 15 HBeAg-positive and 17 HBeAg-negative patients (Table 1). Mean duration of follow-up was 1,150.5 ± 869.8 days (range 61–3,090 days) after OLT. No patient showed recurrence of serum HBsAg or serum HBV-DNA with real-time PCR assay (Fig. 2). After 6 months postoperatively, HBIg was used only 0.24 times/month, representing once every 4 months.

Fig. 2

Serum HBV-DNA titer pre- and post-OLT. No patients showed recurrence of serum HBV-DNA with real-time PCR assay. LLoD lower limit of detection

Explanted liver samples were obtained from 12 of the 32 patients, including 4 HBeAg-positive and 8 HBeAg-negative patients (Table 1). Serum HBV-DNA was detectable in five patients (42%), with a median HBV-DNA level of 3.5 log10 copies/mL. Seven patients showed malignant hepatic tumor. All 12 patients received pre-OLT antiviral therapy for a median duration of 163.5 days. Mean follow-up was 1,051 ± 416 days (range 115–1,576 days) after OLT.

HBV viral status at the time of OLT

Serum HBV-DNA levels and serum HBcrAg at the time of OLT were positively correlated (r = 0.461, P < 0.05) (Fig. 3a). HBV cccDNA was detected in 11 patients (83%), with median HBV cccDNA levels of −0.77 log10 copies/cell. A significant positive correlation was observed between explanted liver cccDNA and serum HBV-DNA (r = 0.760, P < 0.005) (Fig. 3b). Although 6 of 12 patients from whom explanted livers were obtained were serum HBV-DNA negative at OLT, 5 of those 6 patients were positive for serum HBcrAg and intrahepatic HBV cccDNA.

Fig. 3

Correlations between HBV-related markers at the time of OLT. Significant correlations were apparent between: a serum HBcrAg and serum HBV-DNA (r = 0.461, P < 0.05); and b intrahepatic cccDNA and serum HBV-DNA (r = 0.625, P < 0.05)

Time course of serum HBcrAg, intrahepatic HBV cccDNA and intrahepatic HBsAg/HBcAg

A total of 13 patients with 14 biopsies collected between 11 and 74 months post-OLT were studied (Table 2). After OLT, median serum HBcrAg decreased from 4.78 log10 IU/mL to undetectable (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 4a). Seven biopsy specimens showed no detectable HBV cccDNA. The median concentration of HBV cccDNA was −3.19 log10 copies/cell. Median cccDNA decreased from −0.77 to −3.19 log10 copies/cell. This equates to a −0.77 log10 decrease (P < 0.005) in cccDNA levels achieved after OLT (Fig. 4b).

Table 2

Characteristics of the 13 patients with liver biopsy after OLT

At transplantation								At biopsy
Pt	Age (years)	Gender	HCC	HBeAg	HBcrAg (log10 IU/mL)	Serum HBV-DNA (log10 copies/mL)	Intrahepatic cccDNA (log10 copies/cell)	Follow-up (days)	HBeAg	HBcrAg (log10 IU/mL)	Serum HBV-DNA (log10 copies/mL)	cccDNA (log10 copies/cell)	Immunosuppressants				Prophylaxis
													Steroid	CyA	FK	MMF	Antiviral agents	Duration (days)
35	26	M	Y	+	NoA	4.5	NoA	2,221	−	UD	UD	−1.12	N	N	Y	Y	LAM	2,269
115	50	M	Y	−	UD	UD	−1.25	895	NoA	3.2	UD	UD	N	N	Y	Y	LAM	943
97	50	M	Y	+	5.7	3.9	NoA	1,283	−	3.2	UD	−0.46	N	Y	N	N	LAM + ADV	1,787
120	57	M	Y	−	5.2	2.7	−1.20	1,082	NoA	UD	NoA	−3.19	N	Y	Y	Y	LAM	1,135
129	48	M	N	+	3.8	4.8	NoA	709	NoA	3.8	NoA	UD	N	N	Y	Y	LAM	720
148	56	F	Y	+	3.7	2.7	−0.24	370	−	UD	UD	UD	Y	N	Y	N	LAM	690
148	56	F	Y	+	3.7	2.7	−0.24	553	NoA	UD	NoA	UD	Y	N	Y	N	LAM	873
177	37	M	Y	−	3.9	UD	NoA	485	−	3.0	UD	UD	N	N	Y	Y	LAM + ADV	2,057
167	63	M	N	−	4.1	UD	−0.33	485	−	UD	UD	−2.23	Y	N	Y	Y	LAM + ADV	2,278
181	52	M	N	−	5.1	UD	−1.81	338	−	3.4	UD	−2.50	Y	N	Y	N	ETV	1,301
153	47	F	N	+	3.4	5.8	NoA	401	NoA	3.1	UD	−0.70	Y	N	Y	Y	LAM	415
135	48	M	Y	+	5.8	3.5	0.28	632	−	3.4	UD	−1.38	N	N	Y	Y	LAM	735
159	54	M	Y	−	3.2	UD	−1.61	385	NoA	UD	NoA	UD	Y	N	Y	Y	ETV	390
94	53	M	Y	−	55	42	0.32	1,409	−	33	UD	−2.01	N	Y	N	Y	LAM + ADV	2,179

ADV adefovir, cccDNA covalently closed circular deoxyribonucleic acid, CyA cyclosporine A, ETV entecavir, F female, FK tacrolimus, HBcrAg hepatitis B core-related antigen, HBeAg hepatitis B e antigen, HBsAg hepatitis B surface antigen, HBV hepatitis B virus, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, LAM lamivudine, M male, MMF mycophenolate mofetil, N no, NA not assessed, OLT orthotopic liver transplantation, Pt patient number, UD undetectable, Y yes

Fig. 4

Time course of serum HBcrAg (a), and intrahepatic HBV cccDNA (b). Significant decreases were observed (a P < 0.0001, b P < 0.005). Serum HBcrAg was detectable in 48% of patients after 1,252 days post-OLT. Intrahepatic HBV cccDNA was positive in 57% of patients at 670.5 days post-OLT (c)

Serum HBcrAg was detectable in 48% of patients (10/21) after 1,252 days post-OLT. Intrahepatic HBV cccDNA was positive in 57% of patients (8/14) after 670.5 days post-OLT (Fig. 4c).

HBsAg/HBcAg immunohistochemical staining was studied in the 14 biopsied liver specimens. All samples were negative for HBsAg/HBcAg immunohistochemical staining.

Correlation between pre-OLT serum HBV-DNA and post-OLT HBcrAg, intrahepatic HBV cccDNA

No significant correlation was identified between pre-OLT serum HBV-DNA and post-OLT serum HBcrAg (Fig. 5a). A linear correlation was apparent between serum levels of HBV-DNA at the time of OLT and post-OLT cccDNA (r = 0.534, P < 0.05) (Fig. 5b). All eight patients (100%) with serum HBV-DNA <3 log10 copies/mL at the time of OLT showed lower than −2 log10 copies/cell of HBV cccDNA at post-OLT, while patients with pre-OLT serum HBV-DNA >3 log10 copies/mL showed a significantly higher rate of post-OLT cccDNA higher than −2 log10 copies/cell (P < 0.003) (Fig. 5c).

Fig. 5

Correlation between pre-OLT serum HBV-DNA and post-OLT HBcrAg (a), and pre-OLT serum HBV-DNA and post-OLT HBV cccDNA (b). A linear correlation was observed in b (r = 0.534, P < 0.05), but not in a. All eight patients (100%) with serum HBV-DNA <3 log10 copies/mL at the time of OLT showed post-OLT cccDNA <2 log10 copies/cell, significantly higher than the rate of 33% found in patients with higher HBV-DNA levels (two of six patients) (P < 0.003) (c)

Correlation between pre-OLT HBcrAg and post-OLT HBcrAg and intrahepatic HBV cccDNA

No significant correlation was found between pre-OLT HBcrAg and post-OLT serum HBcrAg (Fig. 6a). However, a linear correlation was observed between HBcrAg at the time of OLT and post-OLT cccDNA (r = 0.634, P < 0.05) (Fig. 6b). All six patients (100%) with HBcrAg >4 log10 IU/mL at the time of OLT showed detectable HBV cccDNA post-OLT, while patients with pre-OLT HBcrAg <4 log10 IU/mL showed a significantly lower rate (14%) of detectable cccDNA post-OLT (P < 0.001) (Fig. 6c).

Fig. 6

Correlation between pre-OLT HBcrAg and post-OLT HBcrAg (a), and pre-OLT HBcrAg and post-OLT HBV cccDNA (b). A linear correlation was observed in b (r = 0.634, P < 0.05), but not in a. All six patients (100%) with HBcrAg >4 log10 IU/mL at the time of OLT showed HBV cccDNA detectable at post-OLT, while patients with pre-OLT HBcrAg <4 log10 IU/mL showed a significantly higher rate of undetectable cccDNA post-OLT (P < 0.001) (c)

Age at OLT, gender, HCC at OLT, HBeAg status at OLT, donor anti-HBc status, follow-up duration, immunosuppressive agents, antiviral agents, and duration of antiviral agent administration showed no effect on intrahepatic levels of cccDNA after OLT.

Discussion

This study found that even under clinically successful HBV control post-OLT, serum HBcrAg and intrahepatic HBV cccDNA were detectable in 48% and 57% of patients, respectively. Pre-OLT high serum HBV-DNA titer could predict post-OLT cccDNA level.

In 1991, Müller et al. [19] reported the first use of long-term HBIg immunoprophylaxis, reducing recurrence rate to 25% for 6 months and 18% for 12 months. In 1993, Samuel et al. [20] reported a multicenter study in which the 3-year-risk of HBV recurrence was 75 ± 6% in patients without HBIg, 74 ± 5% with short-term (2-month) HBIg and 36 ± 4% with long-term (>6-month) HBIg treatment. Patients who were positive for HBeAg or HBV-DNA displayed the greatest risk of recurrence (83%) and patients with acute fulminant liver failure showed the lowest risk (16%).

In 1996, Grellier et al. [21] reported a trial of LAM as a prophylactic treatment achieving only 18% recurrence of HBV by 6 months after OLT. However, the long-term recurrence rate at 3 years after OLT had progressed to 41%, indicating that LAM monotherapy is not recommendable for post-transplantation prophylaxis.

Although monotherapy with HBIg or LAM results in a high rate of recurrence, a combination of these agents has been administered with reasonable success. In 1998, Markowitz et al. [22] reported no recurrences after 1 year with combination therapy. Since HBIg is very expensive, several reports have described modified combination therapies. We have previously shown that long-term LAM with short-term high-dose HBIg followed by low-dose HBIg sufficient to maintain HBsAb titer <10 IU/L is cost-effective and powerful enough to control HBV recurrence after LDLT. With this cost-saving method, no clinical evidence of HBV recurrence has been seen. Intrahepatic HBV cccDNA has been shown to be positive in 57% of patients. This would be comparable to the findings from previous reports showing positive results for HBV cccDNA post-OLT [23].

Intrahepatic HBV cccDNA could be detected in almost all patients with HBV-related cirrhosis pre-OLT, although all patients had received antiviral therapy pre-OLT and half of the patients had undetectable serum HBV-DNA. Recent studies have also shown that suppression of HBV-DNA in serum does not indicate clearance of the virus from hepatocytes [24], and the long half-life of cccDNA in reinfected hepatocytes is responsible for viral recurrence following OLT [19, 25–29]. Several reports have noted that high pre-OLT serum HBV-DNA levels would predict HBV recurrence post-OLT [30, 31].

Our data indicate that higher pre-OLT serum HBV-DNA levels and HBcrAg levels correlate with post-OLT cccDNA levels. Even with our successful protocol, patients with high pre-OLT serum HBV-DNA levels and HBcrAg levels, particularly >3 log10 copies/mL and >4 log10 IU/mL, respectively, should be followed with care for HBV recurrence.

HBV is an enveloped DNA virus containing an RC DNA genome, which is converted into a cccDNA in the nucleus of infected cells. The cccDNA episome is the transcriptional template for HBV messenger RNA transcripts that encode viral structural and non-structural proteins and the 3.5-kb pregenomic (pg) RNA template for reverse transcription and synthesis of the viral genome. The pg RNA serves as the template for reverse transcription to generate viral DNA. Nucleos(t)ide analogues inhibit the reverse transcription of pg RNA, and can thus rapidly decrease serum levels of HBV-DNA, but cannot eliminate the cccDNA reservoir. The cccDNA is thus recognized as a putative marker for real HBV-DNA replication ability that might suggest the suitable time to withdraw nucleos(t)ide analogues. HBcrAg, representing a complex of HBeAg, HBcAg, and p22cr, has been shown to correlate with cccDNA [17]. HBcrAg would thus represent a good non-invasive marker to recognize intrahepatic HBV replication status. The present data show positive results for HBcrAg as frequently as for intrahepatic HBV cccDNA (Fig. 4). Although evaluation for low titers of HBcrAg would be difficult (Fig. 5a), positive HBcrAg offers a good marker to confirm HBV reinfection after OLT. Even when serum HBV-DNA is undetectable, patients at higher risk of HBV recurrence can be differentiated from those at lower risk of HBV recurrence who can be withdrawn from HBIg or nucleos(t)ide analogues by high HBcrAg positivities.

In conclusion, long-term nucleos(t)ide analogues with short-term high-dose HBIg followed by low-dose HBIg supplementation only when the HBsAb titer falls below 10 IU/L is sufficient to suppress intrahepatic HBV-DNA replication and control HBV recurrence after OLT. However, almost half of the patients were positive for intrahepatic HBV cccDNA and serum HBcrAg, even though titers were low. Patients with high pre-OLT serum HBV-DNA levels, high pre-OLT HBcrAg levels, and positive post-OLT results for HBcrAg should be carefully followed to identify patients who might show HBV recurrence.