| Literature DB >> 21484047 |
Fernanda Vaisman1, Daniel Alves Bulzico, Cencita Hosannah Cordeiro Noronha Pessoa, Maria Alice Neves Bordallo, Ullyanov Bezerra Toscano de Mendonça, Fernando Luiz Dias, Claudia Medina Coeli, Rossana Corbo, Mario Vaisman.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic approaches in pediatric populations are based on adult data because there is a lack of appropriate data for children. Consequently, there are many controversies regarding the proper treatment of pediatric patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21484047 PMCID: PMC3059871 DOI: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000200017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Initial presentation and good response to initial therapy with I‐131‐Therapy.
| N % | RR (95% CI ) | P‐value | ||
| Age | >10 | 56 | 1 | 0,328 |
| <10 | 9 | 0,38 (0,05‐2,5) | ||
| Gender | F | 48 | 1 | 0,188 |
| M | 16 | 0,4 (0,1‐1,5) | ||
| Size | >2cm | 57 | 1 | 0,372 |
| <2cm | 8 | 0,63(0,23‐1,73) | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | Y | 40 | 1 | 0,014 |
| N | 25 | 0,34 (0,14‐0,8) | ||
| Multicentricity | Y | 17 | 1 | 0,719 |
| N | 48 | 1,17 (0,48‐2,84) | ||
| Distant Metastasis | Y | 19 | 1 | 0,014 |
| N | 46 | 0,15 (0,02‐0,96) | ||
| Post therapy scan uptake | TB | 45 | 1 | 0,353 |
| OTB | 20 | 0,52 (0,17‐1,60) |
RR – risk relative; 95% CI – 95 confidence interval, Y‐ yes (present at diagnosis), N‐ No (absent at diagnosis; TB‐ Thyroid bed; OTB‐outside thyroid bed
Staging systems and prediction of good response to initial therapy.
| I | II | III | IV | P‐value | ||
| TNM | NED | 16 | 1 | 0,014 | ||
| Persistent | 30 | 18 | ||||
| MACIS | NED | 16 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0,019 |
| Persistent | 31 | 7 | 7 | |||
| AMES | NED | 16 | 1 | 0,014 | ||
| Persistent | 30 | 18 | ||||
| ATA | NED | 9 | 7 | 1 | 0,001 | |
| Persistent | 5 | 27 | 16 |
NED = no evidence of disease; Persistent = persistent disease; MACIS (I = <6 points; II = 6‐6.99; III‐ 7‐7.99 and IV‐ >8); AMES ( I‐ low risk; II‐high risk); ATA (I‐Low risk; II‐ Intermediate Risk and III‐ High risk)
Accuracy and the staging system on predicting good response to initial therapy.
| Measurements | TNM%(CI 95%) | MACIS%(CI 95%) | AMES% (CI 95%) | ATA% (CI 95%) |
| Sensitivity | 94.12 (71.31‐ 99.85) | 94.12 (71.31‐ 99.85) | 94.12 (71.31‐ 99.85) | 94.12 (71.31‐ 99.85) |
| Specificity | 37.5 (23.95‐ 52.65) | 35.42 (22.16‐ 50.54) | 37.5 (23.95‐ 52.65) | 33.33 (20.40‐48.41) |
| Positive predictive value | 34.78 (21.35‐ 50.25) | 34.04 (20.86‐ 49.31) | 34.78 (21.35‐50.25) | 33.33 (20.40‐ 48.41) |
| Negative predictive value | 94.74 (73.97‐ 99.87) | 94.44 (72.71‐ 99.86) | 94.74 (73.97‐ 99.87) | 94.12 (71.31‐ 99.85) |
95% CI – 95 confidence interval