We investigate the dynamics of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1/S-OIV) pandemic by analyzing data obtained from World Health Organization containing the total number of laboratory-confirmed cases of infections--by country--in a period of 69 days, from 26 April to 3 July, 2009. Specifically, we find evidence of exponential growth in the total number of confirmed cases and linear growth in the number of countries with confirmed cases. We also find that, i) at early stages, the cumulative distribution of cases among countries exhibits linear behavior on log-log scale, being well approximated by a power law decay; ii) for larger times, the cumulative distribution presents a systematic curvature on log-log scale, indicating a gradual change to lognormal behavior. Finally, we compare these empirical findings with the predictions of a simple stochastic model. Our results could help to select more realistic models of the dynamics of influenza-type pandemics.
We investigate the dynamics of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1/S-OIV) pandemic by analyzing data obtained from World Health Organization containing the total number of laboratory-confirmed cases of infections--by country--in a period of 69 days, from 26 April to 3 July, 2009. Specifically, we find evidence of exponential growth in the total number of confirmed cases and linear growth in the number of countries with confirmed cases. We also find that, i) at early stages, the cumulative distribution of cases among countries exhibits linear behavior on log-log scale, being well approximated by a power law decay; ii) for larger times, the cumulative distribution presents a systematic curvature on log-log scale, indicating a gradual change to lognormal behavior. Finally, we compare these empirical findings with the predictions of a simple stochastic model. Our results could help to select more realistic models of the dynamics of influenza-type pandemics.
The spread of infectious diseases is a threat to the world public health and a
subject of great scientific interest. Influenza viruses, for example, circulate
around the world every year and seasonal influenza is one of the most worrying
respiratory infections of humans [1]. From time to time new strains of influenza virus emerge
and cause large-scale global pandemics – such as the 2009 influenza A
(H1N1/S-OIV). The dynamics of influenza-type pandemics has been the focus of several
scientific works which may provide necessary information to deal with future
pandemic events [2]–[9]. However, conventional modeling techniques are usually
only able to provide a general idea of how a pandemic might evolve, since crucial
information concerning model parameters is generally unavailable.
Methods
Here, we investigate the dynamics of influenza-type pandemics using techniques of
statistical physics typically applied in the study of complex systems. We analyze a
database - from World Health Organization - containing laboratory-confirmed cases of
influenza A (H1N1/S-OIV) infections around the world [10]. Specifically, we analyze the
total number of laboratory-confirmed cases - by country - in a period of 69 days,
from 26 April to 3 July, 2009.We search for patterns of spread for the virus influenza A (H1N1/S-OIV). Basically,
we investigate the growth in the total number of confirmed cases, the growth in the
number of countries with confirmed cases and the cumulative distribution of cases
among countries. We also propose a simple stochastic model which reproduces the main
empirical findings obtained from the analysis of the database on the 2009 influenza
A (H1N1/S-OIV) pandemic.
Results
First, we consider the time evolution of the global number of confirmed cases,
Y(t). At a given time t, the
total number of cases Y is given by the sum of y
over all countries. In Fig. 1A
we show Y(t) in comparison with an exponential
curve, given by the equation , with
(compare with results reported in ref. [11]). This result suggests that
the total number of confirmed cases exhibits an exponential growth. However, a
systematic deviation of the exponential behavior can be observed for smaller times
(t < 20 days). In addition, Fig. 1B shows the time evolution of the total
number of countries with confirmed cases, W(t).
Observe that W(t) exhibits approximately a linear
growth in all the period considered.
Figure 1
Temporal evolution of cases and countries with confirmed cases.
(A) The world total number of influenza A (H1N1)
laboratory-confirmed cases, Y(t), on
mono-log scale, for the period of 69 days, from 26 April to 3 July, 2009.
The solid line is given by , with
. (B) The total number of countries with
confirmed cases, W(t), for the same
period. A linear least-square fit to the data (solid line) suggests
.
Temporal evolution of cases and countries with confirmed cases.
(A) The world total number of influenza A (H1N1)
laboratory-confirmed cases, Y(t), on
mono-log scale, for the period of 69 days, from 26 April to 3 July, 2009.
The solid line is given by , with
. (B) The total number of countries with
confirmed cases, W(t), for the same
period. A linear least-square fit to the data (solid line) suggests
.Next, we investigate the distribution of confirmed cases among countries and its time
evolution. In order to reduce statistical fluctuations, it is common to consider the
cumulative distribution . Here,
y is the number of confirmed cases in a given country and
P(y) is the probability distribution function
(PDF) of y.The empirical cumulative distribution R(y), for
initial times, is shown in Fig.
2A. In this range, R(y) presents linear
behavior on log-log scale being well described by a power law decay,
where α is the power
law exponent. The time evolution of the power law exponent α is
shown in Fig. 2B. Observe that
α stays approximately constant,
0.35<α<0.040, for 21 days.
Figure 2
Cumulative distribution of cases among countries: power law
behavior.
(A) Empirical cumulative distribution,
R(y), of laboratory-confirmed cases
y for distinct times (few specific days are displayed
for better visualization). The solid lines are power laws, given by Eq. (1),
with exponents following Fig. 2B. (B) Temporal evolution of the
power law exponent α, obtained by least-square fits to
the data. Observe that 0.35<α<0.40 for a period
of about 20 days.
Cumulative distribution of cases among countries: power law
behavior.
(A) Empirical cumulative distribution,
R(y), of laboratory-confirmed cases
y for distinct times (few specific days are displayed
for better visualization). The solid lines are power laws, given by Eq. (1),
with exponents following Fig. 2B. (B) Temporal evolution of the
power law exponent α, obtained by least-square fits to
the data. Observe that 0.35<α<0.40 for a period
of about 20 days.For larger times, R(y) gradually deviates from the
power law behavior (Supplementary Figure). In this range,
R(y)has a modest negative curvature everywhere
(see Fig. 3A) and is in good
agreement with log-normal curves given by
Figure 3
Cumulative distribution of cases among countries: log-normal
behavior.
(A) Empirical cumulative distribution,
R(y), laboratory-confirmed cases
y, for larger times (for better visualization, we
display few specific days). The systematic curvature on log-log scale
indicates a gradual deviation from power law behavior. The solid lines are
given by Eq. (2), with parameters shown in Fig. 3B. (B)
Temporal evolution of parameters α (circles) and
β (squares) obtained by least-square fits of Eq.
(2) to the data.
Where c is a normalization constant and α and
β are the parameters. Notice that
R(y) behaves as a power law,
, when . The time evolution of
the parameters α and β of the log-normal
curves are shown in Fig. 3B.
Cumulative distribution of cases among countries: log-normal
behavior.
(A) Empirical cumulative distribution,
R(y), laboratory-confirmed cases
y, for larger times (for better visualization, we
display few specific days). The systematic curvature on log-log scale
indicates a gradual deviation from power law behavior. The solid lines are
given by Eq. (2), with parameters shown in Fig. 3B. (B)
Temporal evolution of parameters α (circles) and
β (squares) obtained by least-square fits of Eq.
(2) to the data.
Discussion
The exponential growth shown in Fig.
1A is consistent with typical results in epidemiology. Well known models
for the spread of epidemics, such as SEIR model, predicts exponential growth in the
number of infections at early stages of the epidemic. A possible explanation of the
deviation of exponential behavior for smaller times, also shown in Fig. 1A, may be found in Fig. 1B. The growth of individual
countries is added to the growth of the number of countries with new cases. For
initial times, when the total number of cases is small, this combination may
generate a deviation of the exponential behavior. For larger times, when the number
of cases is large, the effect of the entry of new countries with few infections may
be much less intense.According to results shown in Fig.
2, the distribution of cases among countries exhibits power law behavior
- indicating scale invariance. The presence of power law behavior suggests that the
system self-organizes into a scale-free state. This phenomenon is a remarkable
characteristic of a wide range of complex systems - from physics to biology and
medicine [12].
Scale invariance in the global spread of influenza pandemic for initial stages is a
remarkable feature which is unpredicted by many traditional models for the evolution
of infectious diseases. This finding bring to mind a previous study on the
distribution of epidemic events in isolated populations [13]. In both cases, the cumulative
distribution of events follows a power law behavior, with exponent
α∼0.3 for isolated populations and
0.035<α<0.40 for the 2009 influenza pandemic.A possible factor contributing to the observed scale invariance is human mobility -
which has been considered a fundamental ingredient for infectious diseases to spread
rapidly through the world population [14]–[16]. Human mobility may alter the
evolution of local epidemics, with the entry of new infectious individuals in a
given region, causing a non-local effect [17]. Surprisingly, human travel
exhibits scaling laws such as the power law distribution that we find for influenza
pandemics [14].
Therefore, it is natural to consider human mobility, including the air traffic in
the worldwide air-transportation network, as a possible mechanism contributing for
the power law behavior shown in Fig.
2A.In contrast, other factors may contribute for the deviation from power law behavior
observed for larger times. Country-based contingency plans, for example, have been
implemented in order to control the international spread of influenza pandemic.
Studies have estimated the impact of restricting international travel and imposing
entry or exit screening of passengers at airports [18]. Other local contingency
plans, which may be a function of the country's level of preparedness to deal
with the pandemic, have been implemented in order to reduce the spread of influenza
infections [17].
In addition, it is well known that seasonality and weather conditions, such as
temperature and relative humidity, affect the dynamics of influenza transmission
[19]–[20]. We cannot discard the possibility that such factors,
which can largely vary from country to country, may contribute towards changing the
shape of the cumulative distribution of cases among countries.Our findings suggest a crossover in the shape of the cumulative distribution of cases
among countries - from power law for initial times to log-normal for larger times.
However, we remark that a log-normal distribution can be mistaken locally for a
power law. In fact, a log-normal distribution can mimic a power law over a
relatively large interval. Concerning its origin, typically log-normal forms
underlie random multiplicative process [12] – a pure random
multiplicative process is defined as , being
a random number. Thus, factors such as the ones described
above may be acting in a multiplicative way in the dynamics of influenza pandemic.
This may be a possible origin of the log-normal behavior or
R(y) observed for large times.Next we present an alternative way to interpret our empirical findings. We compare
our results with the predictions of a simple stochastic model. Let us consider that
the number of cases in a given country follows a process given by the
ruleWhere y(t+1) and
y(t) are the number of cases in the times
t+1 and t respectively, and
is a random number following an exponential distribution
with mean µ. Each country evolves independently of the others
countries. The system evolves starting from a given initial condition – for
example, a particular number of countries with
y(t = 0)
= 1. For each time step two new countries are added to the
system, each one with probability p.The rule described in Eq. 3 indicates that the number of cases in the time
t+1 depends of the number of cases in the time
t. This assumption is compatible with the dynamics of an
infectious disease. Each individual infected with influenza virus, for example, has
the potential to spread the virus to its neighborhood. Observe also that the random
nature of in Eq. (3) is not essential to obtain the results described
below. However, the random nature of mimics possible
fluctuations which are common in real systems.A typical simulation of this model is shown in Fig. 4 for a particular choice of parameters.
Observe that the model predicts qualitatively several aspects of the empirical
results – the exponential growth after an initial transient, the linear growth
in the number of countries with confirmed cases and a cumulative distribution
exhibiting a systematic curvature on log-log scale indicating lognormal
behavior.
Figure 4
Simulation of the stochastic model.
The model is given by Eq. (3), with and
p = 0.85. Initial condition: there
are only one country with
y(t = 0)
= 1. (A) Temporal evolution of the total
number of confirmed cases, Y(t), on
mono-log scale, for time steps from 1 to 70. The solid line is given by
, with
λ = 0.05. (B)
Temporal evolution of the total number of countries with confirmed cases,
W(t), for the same time steps. The
solid line is .
(C) Cumulative distribution,
R(y), for
t = 10 steps (squares),
t = 30 (up triangles),
t = 50 (down triangles) and
t = 70 (circles). For comparison,
we show a power law given by Eq. (1), for
t = 10, and a lognormal curve given by
Eq. (2) for t = 10 steps.
Simulation of the stochastic model.
The model is given by Eq. (3), with and
p = 0.85. Initial condition: there
are only one country with
y(t = 0)
= 1. (A) Temporal evolution of the total
number of confirmed cases, Y(t), on
mono-log scale, for time steps from 1 to 70. The solid line is given by
, with
λ = 0.05. (B)
Temporal evolution of the total number of countries with confirmed cases,
W(t), for the same time steps. The
solid line is .
(C) Cumulative distribution,
R(y), for
t = 10 steps (squares),
t = 30 (up triangles),
t = 50 (down triangles) and
t = 70 (circles). For comparison,
we show a power law given by Eq. (1), for
t = 10, and a lognormal curve given by
Eq. (2) for t = 10 steps.In this study, we identify spreading patterns of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1/S-OIV)
pandemic for a particular time period. Our results provide quantitative evidence of
a crossover in the shape of the cumulative distribution of cases – from power
law behavior at early stages to log-normal behavior for larger times. We discuss
possible factors that may contribute towards changing the shape of the cumulative
distribution from power law to log-normal. Country-based contingency plans,
country's level of preparedness to deal with the pandemic, seasonal effects,
weather conditions among others may be acting in a multiplicative way generating the
observed behavior.Our findings may give us information on the underlying mechanisms governing
influenza-type pandemics. For example, the simple stochastic model proposed in this
work suggests that the number of confirmed cases in a given country follows a
multiplicative process with exponential noise.The future evolution of any influenza pandemic is difficult to predict. However, the
analysis of epidemiological data and the selection of realistic models may provide
some insight in the spatial and temporal evolution of pandemic events. Models for
the spread of infectious diseases are useful tools - can project plausible
scenarios, guide control strategies, suggests roles of antiviral drugs and vaccines
and so on. Our empirical results could help to select realistic models of the
dynamics of influenza-type pandemic events.Cumulative distribution of cases among countries for all data.
Empirical cumulative distribution, R(y),
of laboratory-confirmed cases y for all data (48 days
within the period of 69 days, from 26 April to 3 July, 2009). The data are
shown from smaller to larger times – from left to right and from top
to bottom. Observe the gradual convergence from a linear behavior on log-log
scale (power law behavior) to curves with a modest negative curvature
everywhere (log-normal behavior).(TIF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Christophe Fraser; Christl A Donnelly; Simon Cauchemez; William P Hanage; Maria D Van Kerkhove; T Déirdre Hollingsworth; Jamie Griffin; Rebecca F Baggaley; Helen E Jenkins; Emily J Lyons; Thibaut Jombart; Wes R Hinsley; Nicholas C Grassly; Francois Balloux; Azra C Ghani; Neil M Ferguson; Andrew Rambaut; Oliver G Pybus; Hugo Lopez-Gatell; Celia M Alpuche-Aranda; Ietza Bojorquez Chapela; Ethel Palacios Zavala; Dulce Ma Espejo Guevara; Francesco Checchi; Erika Garcia; Stephane Hugonnet; Cathy Roth Journal: Science Date: 2009-05-11 Impact factor: 47.728