Literature DB >> 21483594

Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance (MLSB(i)) among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Libya.

Mohamed O Ahmed1, Mohamed H Alghazali, Abdelalbaset R Abuzweda, Samira G Amri.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21483594      PMCID: PMC3066769          DOI: 10.3402/ljm.v5i0.4636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Libyan J Med        ISSN: 1819-6357            Impact factor:   1.657


× No keyword cloud information.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) first emerged as nosocomial pathogens in the early 1960s are of great concern to public health and highly reported in human clinical samples (1). There are major international concerns about rising levels of MRSA and multi-drug resistant S. aureus owing to the difficulties of treating infections and the ease with which MRSA spreads within hospitals (2). Until recently, most infections of MRSA were acquired primarily in hospital settings, but now MRSA is responsible for both hospital and community-acquired infections (1). The objective of this study was to investigate MRSA collected isolates for MLSB phenotypes, in particular inducible clindamycin resistance (MLSBi). MRSA collected isolates of hospital-origin were further investigated at the Microbiology Department, Biotechnology Research Centre, Tripoli, Libya. One hundred and twenty-eight MRSA isolates were confirmed at species level as S. aureus by culturing onto mannitol salt agar (MSA) and API Staph test strips (bioMerieux). Confirmation as MRSA was by latex agglutination test for PBP2a and disc diffusion method against cefoxitin in accordance with British Society of Antimicrobials and Chemotherapy guidelines (BSAC) as described by Andrews (3). Isolates were also tested against erythromycin, clindamycin, and synercid for the characterization of MLSB phenotypic isolates. D-tests were performed on isolates exhibiting erythromycin resistance, to assay for the presence of inducible clindamycin resistance (MLSBi phenotype) as described by Fiebelkorn et al. (4). Of the 128 tested MRSA isolates, 24.2% (n=31) were resistant to clindamycin, 63.2% (n=81) isolates were resistant to erythromycin, and 17.9% (n=23) were resistant to synercid. Twelve isolates (9.3%) exhibited MLSBc (constitutive) phenotype and D-tests identified six isolates (4.6%) with inducible resistance to clindamycin (MLSBi phenotype). Clindamycin is an efficient and economic lincosamide drug used for the treatment of staphylococci infection (5). One macrolide resistance mechanism, modification of a drug binding site on the ribosome, results in resistance to macrolides, azalides, lincosamides, and group (B) streptogramins (MLSB). MLSB phenotypes can be either constitutive (MLSBc) or inducible (MLSBi). The inducible resistance to clindamycin (MLSBi) in MRSA can severely compromise therapy and can result in failure of clindamycin treatment of MRSA infections when non-suitable therapy (e.g. erythromycin) is given (6). MLSBi strains can be successfully treated with clindamycin; however MLSBi can complicate therapy when MLSBi phenotype-switching into MLSBc occurs possibly due to mutation, in the absence of macrolide inducers (6). Clindamycin can still be used for MRSA infections in our hospitals. (7) However, susceptibility testing for the detection of inducible resistance to clindamycin should be routinely performed (7, 8).
  8 in total

1.  BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 5).

Authors:  J M Andrews
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococci: should clinicians and microbiologists be concerned?

Authors:  James S Lewis; James H Jorgensen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  The clinical significance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  I M Gould
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Community-associated versus healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a 10-year retrospective review.

Authors:  J O Robinson; J C Pearson; K J Christiansen; G W Coombs; R J Murray
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Practical disk diffusion method for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  K R Fiebelkorn; S A Crawford; M L McElmeel; J H Jorgensen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  [The rate of inducible clindamycin resistance and susceptibilities to other antimicrobial agents in staphylococci].

Authors:  Vildan Avkan Oğuz; Nur Yapar; Nurbanu Sezak; Sema Alp Cavuş; Semra Kurutepe; Hasan Peksel; Nedim Cakir; Ayşe Yüce
Journal:  Mikrobiyol Bul       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.622

7.  Clinical Microbiology Services are Essential for Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of MRSA and other Nosocomial Pathogens in Libyan Healthcare Facilities.

Authors:  Kw El-Bouri
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 1.657

8.  Inducible Clindamycin Resistance among Staphylococci Isolated from Burn Patients.

Authors:  A Zorgani; O Shawerf; K Tawil; E El-Turki; Ks Ghenghesh
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 1.657

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Misidentification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitals in Tripoli, Libya.

Authors:  Mohamed O Ahmed; Abdulbaset R Abuzweda; Mohamed H Alghazali; Asma K Elramalli; Samira G Amri; Ezzeddin Sh Aghila; Yousef M Abouzeed
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 1.657

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.