| Literature DB >> 21483521 |
Bc Mathew1, Rs Daniel, Ja Bordom, Iw Campbell.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 21483521 PMCID: PMC3066731 DOI: 10.4176/090429
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Libyan J Med ISSN: 1819-6357 Impact factor: 1.657
Disasters which exposed vulnerability of health services
| year | Place | Consequences |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Gujarat (India) | 3812 health facilities were destroyed when an earthquake of 7.7 magnitude struck. |
| 2003 | Algeria | An earthquake left 50% of the health facilities in the affected area non – functional due to the damage. |
| 2004 | Aceh (Indonesia) | The tsunami destroyed 30 of the 240 health clinics in and seriously damaged 77 others. |
| 2004 | Sri Lanka | The tsunami also ruined 92 heath facilities including 35 hospitals |
| 2005 | Pakistan | An earthquake destroyed 49% of health facilities from sophisticated hospitals to rural primary clinics and drug dispensaries |
| 2008 | China and Myanmar | Myanmar's Cyclone Nargis and China's magnitude 8.0 earthquake devastated more than 50% the health facilities |
Objectives for better functioning of health facilities in emergencies
| 1 | Applying existing technologies and bringing new innovations to ensure the health structures are built to withstand the impact of disasters. |
| 2 | Ensuring that the equipment and supplies of these health facilities remain intact in case of an emergency. |
| 3 | Synchronizing the functioning of different departments within the hospitals. |
| 4 | Improving the preparedness and safety of health workers. |
| 5 | Making sure that the victims of disasters have direct and rapid accessibility to hospitals. |
| 6 | Involving communities and improving coordination with other sectors and experts from other fields such as urban planners, architects, engineers to bring not just awareness, but more importantly action. |
| 7 | Not imposing any restriction on both the local and international media coverage of the disaster. |
| 8 | Having an unequivocal and unpretentious foreign policy to seek aid from international agencies, NGOs, and other governments. |
| 9 | Restricting visits by politicians, and other dignitaries during relief operations. |
| 10 | Life is precious. Invest in health for the present and future generations. |
Features of the Hospital Safety Index
| 1 | A rapid, reliable and low cost diagnostic tool that provides a quick overview of the resilience of hospitals. |
| 2 | Easy to apply by a trained team of engineers, architects and health professionals. |
| 3 | Evaluation team uses the standardized “Safe Hospitals Checklist” to assess the level of safety in 145 areas of the hospital including structural, nonstructural and functional components. |
| 4 | The obtained scores are entered into an Excel spreadsheet (the Index Calculator), and automated formulas tabulate the results. |
| 5 | The final Safety Index score places a health facility into one of the three safety categories: High, Average and Low. |