Literature DB >> 21483428

Impact of methodological decisions on accelerometer outcome variables in young children.

R Ojiambo1, R Cuthill, H Budd, K Konstabel, J A Casajús, A González-Agüero, E Anjila, J J Reilly, C Easton, Y P Pitsiladis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of accelerometer-related methodological decisions relating to the assessment of physical activity and sedentary time has not been conclusively determined in young children.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of epoch and cutoff points on the assessment of physical activity and sedentary time and to determine the accelerometer wear time required to achieve reliable accelerometer data in children.
DESIGN: Children were recruited from centres at Ghent, Glasgow, Gothenburg and Zaragoza.
METHODS: Physical activity was assessed for 1 week in 86 children (41 girls, 45 boys; mean age 7±2 years) by uniaxial accelerometry. The epoch was set at 15 s and reintegrated to 30 and 60 s. Time spent sedentary and in moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was assessed using a range of cutoff points. Number of days required to achieve 80% reliability was predicted using the Spearman-Brown Prophecy formula.
RESULTS: The Reilly cutoff points (<1100 counts per min (CPM)) indicated less sedentary time per day when comparing 15 vs 30 s and 15 vs 60 s epochs: 570±91 vs 579±93 min and 570±91 vs 579±94 min, respectively; P<0.05. Pate cutoff points (>420 counts per 15 s) reported more MVPA time per day compared with Sirard (890 counts per 15 s) and Puyau cutoff points (>3200 counts per min) using 15 s epoch: 78 (4-197) min (median (range) vs 18 (1-80) min and 24 (1-100) min, respectively; P<0.001. Compliance with guidelines of at least 60 min MVPA was 84, 78 and 73% for Pate cutoff points using 15, 30 and 60 s epochs, respectively, but 0% for Sirard and Puyau cutoff points across epochs. The number of days required to achieve 80% reliability for CPM, sedentary and MVPA time was 7.4-8.5 days.
CONCLUSION: Choice of epoch and cutoff point significantly influenced the classification of sedentary and MVPA time and observed compliance to the MVPA guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21483428     DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2011.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)        ISSN: 0307-0565            Impact factor:   5.095


  40 in total

Review 1.  The Influence of Head Impact Threshold for Reporting Data in Contact and Collision Sports: Systematic Review and Original Data Analysis.

Authors:  D King; P Hume; C Gissane; M Brughelli; T Clark
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Swimming and bone: Is low bone mass due to hypogravity alone or does other physical activity influence it?

Authors:  A Gómez-Bruton; A González-Agüero; A Gómez-Cabello; A Matute-Llorente; J A Casajús; G Vicente-Rodríguez
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Parent's Physical Activity Associated With Preschooler Activity in Underserved Populations.

Authors:  Shari L Barkin; Archana P Lamichhane; Jorge A Banda; Meghan M JaKa; Maciej S Buchowski; Kelly R Evenson; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Charlotte Pratt; Simone A French; June Stevens
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Associations between exclusive breastfeeding and physical fitness during childhood.

Authors:  Mahmoud Zaqout; Nathalie Michels; Wolfgang Ahrens; Claudia Börnhorst; Dénes Molnár; Luis A Moreno; Gabriele Eiben; Alfonso Siani; Stalo Papoutsou; Toomas Veidebaum; Stefaan De Henauw
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 5.614

5.  Influence of physical fitness on cardio-metabolic risk factors in European children. The IDEFICS study.

Authors:  M Zaqout; N Michels; K Bammann; W Ahrens; O Sprengeler; D Molnar; C Hadjigeorgiou; G Eiben; K Konstabel; P Russo; D Jiménez-Pavón; L A Moreno; S De Henauw
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Determinant factors of physical fitness in European children.

Authors:  Mahmoud Zaqout; Krishna Vyncke; Luis A Moreno; Pilar De Miguel-Etayo; Fabio Lauria; Denes Molnar; Lauren Lissner; Monica Hunsberger; Toomas Veidebaum; Michael Tornaritis; Lucia A Reisch; Karin Bammann; Ole Sprengeler; Wolfgang Ahrens; Nathalie Michels
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Levels of physical activity and sedentary time among 10- to 12-year-old boys and girls across 5 European countries using accelerometers: an observational study within the ENERGY-project.

Authors:  Maïté Verloigne; Wendy Van Lippevelde; Lea Maes; Mine Yıldırım; Mai Chinapaw; Yannis Manios; Odysseas Androutsos; Eva Kovács; Bettina Bringolf-Isler; Johannes Brug; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  The descriptive epidemiology of the diurnal profile of bouts and breaks in sedentary time in older English adults.

Authors:  D Yerrakalva; A J Cooper; K Westgate; K T Khaw; N J Wareham; S Brage; S J Griffin; K Wijndaele
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Methods of Measurement in epidemiology: sedentary Behaviour.

Authors:  Andrew J Atkin; Trish Gorely; Stacy A Clemes; Thomas Yates; Charlotte Edwardson; Soren Brage; Jo Salmon; Simon J Marshall; Stuart J H Biddle
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Physical activity in 3-6 year old children measured by SenseWear Pro®: direct accelerometry in the course of the week and relation to weight status, media consumption, and socioeconomic factors.

Authors:  Yvonne Vorwerg; David Petroff; Wieland Kiess; Susann Blüher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.