Literature DB >> 21483390

Surgical management of abdominal compartment syndrome.

O Chiara1, S Cimbanassi, S Boati, G Bassi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of intensive care physicians recognize the clinical significance of intra-abdominal hypertension on the outcome of critically ill patients. Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is defined as an intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) >20 mmHg with ongoing organ failure. However, there is no consensus regarding the indications for surgical decompression.
METHODS: A review of personal data and the English literature from 1989 to 2010 focusing on surgical management of ACS.
RESULTS: Opening the abdomen is the most effective method to reduce IAP and is the treatment of choice for ACS when IAP is constantly higher than 30 mmHg with ongoing organ failure refractory to medical therapy. A vertical midline incision is the most popular method of surgical decompression, but bilateral subcostal incisions may be indicated in certain conditions. Surgical decompression always obtains a significant decrease in the IAP with physiological improvement, but the effects on organ function are controversial. Negative pressure devices are the most effective for temporary abdominal closure with a higher rate of primary fascial closure and lower risk of fistulas. When primary fascial closure is not feasible, a planned ventral hernia and spontaneous granulation with or without biologic mesh are the preferred methods for the reconstruction of abdominal wall integrity.
CONCLUSION: Modern surgical techniques for opening the abdomen in patients with ACS refractory to medical therapy result in physiologic improvement with less treatment-related complications, but recuperation of organ dysfunction is variable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21483390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  6 in total

1.  Intra-abdominal pressure and abdominal perfusion pressure early in severe acute pancreatitis misses the forest for the trees.

Authors:  Charles Joseph Miranda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Intra-abdominal pressure correlates with extracellular water content.

Authors:  Wojciech Dąbrowski; Edyta Kotlinska-Hasiec; Andrzej Jaroszynski; Przemyslaw Zadora; Jacek Pilat; Ziemowit Rzecki; Wojciech Zaluska; Daniel Schneditz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effect of intra-abdominal volume increment on kidneys in minipigs with intra-abdominal hypertension after hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation.

Authors:  Zheng-Gang Wang; Hao Tan; Lian-Yang Zhang; Dao-Cheng Liu; Hua-Liang Xiao; Wen-Hua Du
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2014-04-15

4.  Decompressive laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome.

Authors:  J J De Waele; E Kimball; M Malbrain; I Nesbitt; J Cohen; V Kaloiani; R Ivatury; M Mone; D Debergh; M Björck
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  A preliminary prospective study of patients who underwent vacuum-assisted and mesh-mediated fascial traction techniques for open abdomen management with negative fluid therapy: An observational study.

Authors:  Weiliang Tian; Qian Huang; Zheng Yao; Ming Huang; Fan Yang; Yunzhao Zhao; Jieshou Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Diagnosis and treatment of rare complications of pelvic fractures.

Authors:  Zhao-Wen Zong; Quan-Wei Bao; Hua-Yu Liu; Yue Shen; Yu-Feng Zhao; Xiang Hua; Qing-Shan Guo; Lian-Yang Zhang; Hui Chen
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2016-08-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.