OBJECTIVES: To identify and explain morphologic changes of the extraocular muscles (EOMs) in anophthalmic patients. METHODS: Retrospective medical record review of patients with congenital anophthalmia, using magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings to characterize EOM morphology. We then used molecular biology techniques in zebrafish and chick embryos to determine the relationships among the developing eye, periocular neural crest, and EOMs. RESULTS: In 3 human patients with bilateral congenital anophthalmia and preoperative orbital imaging, we observed a spectrum of EOM morphologies ranging from indiscernible muscle tissue to well-formed, organized EOMs. Timing of eye loss in zebrafish and chick embryos correlated with the morphology of EOM organization in the orbit (eye socket). In congenitally eyeless Rx3 zebrafish mutants, or following genetic ablation of the cranial neural crest cells, EOMs failed to organize, which was independent of other craniofacial muscle development. CONCLUSIONS: Orbital development is dependent on interactions between the eye, neural crest, and developing EOMs. Timing of the ocular insult in relation to neural crest migration and EOM development is a key determinant of aberrant EOM organization. Additional research will be required to study patients with unilateral and syndromic anophthalmia and assess for possible differences in clinical outcomes of patients with varied EOM morphology. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The presence and organization of EOMs in anophthalmic eye sockets may serve as a markers for the timing of genetic or teratogenic insults, improving genetic counseling, and assisting with surgical reconstruction and family counseling efforts.
OBJECTIVES: To identify and explain morphologic changes of the extraocular muscles (EOMs) in anophthalmic patients. METHODS: Retrospective medical record review of patients with congenital anophthalmia, using magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings to characterize EOM morphology. We then used molecular biology techniques in zebrafish and chick embryos to determine the relationships among the developing eye, periocular neural crest, and EOMs. RESULTS: In 3 humanpatients with bilateral congenital anophthalmia and preoperative orbital imaging, we observed a spectrum of EOM morphologies ranging from indiscernible muscle tissue to well-formed, organized EOMs. Timing of eye loss in zebrafish and chick embryos correlated with the morphology of EOM organization in the orbit (eye socket). In congenitally eyeless Rx3zebrafish mutants, or following genetic ablation of the cranial neural crest cells, EOMs failed to organize, which was independent of other craniofacial muscle development. CONCLUSIONS: Orbital development is dependent on interactions between the eye, neural crest, and developing EOMs. Timing of the ocular insult in relation to neural crest migration and EOM development is a key determinant of aberrant EOM organization. Additional research will be required to study patients with unilateral and syndromic anophthalmia and assess for possible differences in clinical outcomes of patients with varied EOM morphology. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The presence and organization of EOMs in anophthalmic eye sockets may serve as a markers for the timing of genetic or teratogenic insults, improving genetic counseling, and assisting with surgical reconstruction and family counseling efforts.
Authors: Eldad Tzahor; Hervé Kempf; Roy C Mootoosamy; Andy C Poon; Arhat Abzhanov; Clifford J Tabin; Susanne Dietrich; Andrew B Lassar Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Vera A Voronina; Elena A Kozhemyakina; Christina M O'Kernick; Natan D Kahn; Sharon L Wenger; John V Linberg; Adele S Schneider; Peter H Mathers Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2003-12-08 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Felix Loosli; Wendy Staub; Karin C Finger-Baier; Elke A Ober; Heather Verkade; Joachim Wittbrodt; Herwig Baier Journal: EMBO Rep Date: 2003-08-29 Impact factor: 8.807
Authors: Brenda L Bohnsack; Daniel S Kasprick; Phillip E Kish; Daniel Goldman; Alon Kahana Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jessica Eason; Antionette L Williams; Bahaar Chawla; Christian Apsey; Brenda L Bohnsack Journal: Birth Defects Res Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: Alfonso Saera-Vila; Daniel S Kasprick; Tyler L Junttila; Steven J Grzegorski; Ke'ale W Louie; Estelle F Chiari; Phillip E Kish; Alon Kahana Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Sadie L Hebert; Krysta R Fitzpatrick; Samantha A McConnell; Anja Cucak; Ching Yuan; Linda K McLoon Journal: Exp Cell Res Date: 2017-10-07 Impact factor: 3.905