Literature DB >> 21482460

Evaluation of inter-fraction prostate motion using kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography during radiotherapy.

J A Snir1, J J Battista, G Bauman, S Yartsev.   

Abstract

AIMS: The success of delivering the prescribed radiation dose to the prostate while sparing adjacent sensitive tissues is largely dependent on the ability to accurately target the prostate during treatment. Kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging can be used to monitor and compensate for inter-fraction prostate motion, but this procedure increases treatment session time and adds incidental radiation dose to the patient. We carried out a retrospective study of CBCT data to evaluate the systematic and random correction shifts of the prostate with respect to bones and external marks.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 449 daily CBCT studies from 17 patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for localised prostate cancer were analysed. The difference between patient set-up correction shifts applied by radiation therapists (via matching prostate position in CBCT and planning computed tomography) and shifts obtained by matching bony anatomy in the same studies was used as a measure of the daily inter-fraction internal prostate motion.
RESULTS: The average systematic and random shifts in prostate positions, calculated over all fractions versus only 10 fractions, were not found to be significantly different. DISCUSSION: The measured prostate shifts with respect to bony anatomy and external marks after the first 10 imaging sessions were shown to provide adequate predictive power for defining patient-specific margins in future fractions without a need for ongoing computed tomography imaging. Different options for CBCT imaging schedule are proposed that will reduce the treatment session time and imaging dose to radiotherapy patients while ensuring appropriate prostate cover and normal tissue sparing.
Copyright © 2011 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21482460     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  11 in total

1.  In vivo reproducibility of robotic probe placement for a novel ultrasound-guided radiation therapy system.

Authors:  Muyinatu A Lediju Bell; H Tutkun Sen; Iulian Iordachita; Peter Kazanzides; John Wong
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-07-23

2.  The impact of androgen deprivation therapy on setup errors during external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Cem Onal; Yemliha Dolek; Yurday Ozdemir
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Use of planar kV vs. CBCT in evaluation of setup errors in oesophagus carcinoma radiotherapy.

Authors:  Liliana Martins; Jose Guilherme Couto; Barbara Barbosa
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-11-14

4.  Comparison between manual and automatic image registration in image-guided radiation therapy using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography with an imaging beam line for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Hashido; Shinya Nakasone; Mari Fukao; Seiichi Ota; Shinichi Inoue
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-09-21

5.  Is it essential to use fiducial markers during cone-beam CT-based radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients?

Authors:  Berna A Yildirim; Cem Onal; Yemliha Dolek
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Evaluation of image-guidance strategies for prostate cancer.

Authors:  T Piotrowski; K Kaczmarek; T Bajon; A Ryczkowski; A Jodda; J Kaźmierska
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-08-31

7.  Evaluation of different set-up error corrections on dose-volume metrics in prostate IMRT using CBCT images.

Authors:  Yoshinori Hirose; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Tsuneyuki Tomita; Kenji Kitsuda; Takuya Notogawa; Katsuhito Miki; Kiyonao Nakamura; Takashi Ishigaki
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Correlation between patients' anatomical characteristics and interfractional internal prostate motion during intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shintaroh Maruoka; Yasuo Yoshioka; Fumiaki Isohashi; Osamu Suzuki; Yuji Seo; Yuki Otani; Yuichi Akino; Yutaka Takahashi; Iori Sumida; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-10-06

9.  Quantification and Assessment of Interfraction Setup Errors Based on Cone Beam CT and Determination of Safety Margins for Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Macarena Cubillos Mesías; Judit Boda-Heggemann; Johannes Thoelking; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz; Hansjoerg Wertz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  2D kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers is more precise for daily image guided alignments than soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography for prostate radiation therapy.

Authors:  Peter H Goff; Louis B Harrison; Eli Furhang; Evan Ng; Stephen Bhatia; Frieda Trichter; Ronald D Ennis
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.