Literature DB >> 21482375

Unbalanced reciprocal translocations at amniocentesis.

Chih-Ping Chen1, Pei-Chen Wu, Chen-Ju Lin, Schu-Rern Chern, Fuu-Jen Tsai, Chen-Chi Lee, Dai-Dyi Town, Wen-Lin Chen, Li-Feng Chen, Meng-Shan Lee, Chen-Wen Pan, Wayseen Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present perinatal findings, modes of ascertainments, and modes of segregation in unbalanced reciprocal translocations detected at amniocentesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1987 and July 2010, 40 cases with unbalanced reciprocal translocations were diagnosed by amniocentesis at Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. The 40 cases originated from 29 families; 21 families with one case, 7 families with two cases, and 1 family with five cases.
RESULTS: Of 40 cases, 33 (82.5%) presented fetal ultrasound abnormalities and 7 (17.5%) presented no ultrasound abnormalities. Of 40 cases, 36 (90%) had a segregation mode of adjacent-1 2:2 segregation, 3 (7.5%) had a segregation mode of 3:1 segregation with tertiary trisomy, and 1 (2.5%) had a segregation mode of 3:1 segregation with tertiary monosomy. Of 29 families, 7 (24.1%) had de novo translocations and 22 (75.9%) had inherited translocations. In seven de novo cases, the main modes of ascertainments included abnormal ultrasound findings (n = 5) and advanced maternal age (n = 2). In 22 inherited families, the main modes of first ascertainment included abnormal ultrasound findings (n = 8), a previous aneuploid child (n = 8), advanced maternal age (n = 4), parental carrier status (n = 1), and abnormal maternal serum screening results (n = 1). Among 22 inherited families, 9 (40.9%) had a known parental carrier status, but 13 (59.1%) were unaware of parental carrier status at amniocentesis.
CONCLUSION: Unbalanced reciprocal translocations detected at amniocentesis are frequently associated with abnormal ultrasound findings. Prenatal diagnosis of an unbalanced translocation may incidentally detect a balanced translocation in the family. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities should alert structural chromosome rearrangements and prompt cytogenetic analysis of the fetus and parents if necessary.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21482375     DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2011.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1028-4559            Impact factor:   1.705


  3 in total

1.  Two different microarray technologies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening, due to reciprocal translocation imbalances, demonstrate equivalent euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Kyle J Tobler; Paul R Brezina; Andrew T Benner; Luke Du; Xin Xu; William G Kearns
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Two siblings with unbalanced t(10;21) translocations and non-neuropathic neuropathic bladder.

Authors:  Mandela Thyoka; Alex Henderson; Bozena Starzyk; Anupam Lall
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-02-07

3.  A foetus with 18p11.32-q21.2 duplication and Xp22.33-p11.1 deletion derived from a maternal reciprocal translocation t(X;18)(q13;q21.3).

Authors:  Jun-Kun Chen; Ping Liu; Li-Qin Hu; Qing Xie; Quan-Fei Huang; Hai-Liang Liu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.009

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.