Literature DB >> 2148221

A controlled study on the outcome of inpatient and outpatient treatment of low back pain. Part III. Long-term follow-up of pain, disability, and compliance.

K Härkäpää1, G Mellin, A Järvikoski, H Hurri.   

Abstract

The long-term outcome results of inpatient and outpatient treatment of low back pain (LBP) were studied in 476 subjects (aged 35-54, 63% men) randomly assigned to three study groups: inpatients (n = 157), outpatients (n = 159), and controls (n = 160). The study included changes in the severity of low back pain, grade and disability, compliance with self-care, data on disability pensions, and days of sickness allowance during a 2.5-year follow-up period. These variables were used as outcome criteria. Pain and disability had decreased significantly in the two treated groups up to the 3-month follow-up. LBP was still a little slighter in the inpatients at the 1.5-year and 22-month follow-ups, but there were no significant differences between the groups in disability caused by LBP. The refresher programme carried out 1.5 years after the first one did not bring about as clear short-term improvement in pain and disability as the first treatment. During the whole 2.5-year follow-up compliance with self-care was better in the two treated groups, especially in the inpatients. Days of sickness allowance had increased somewhat more in the controls than in the inpatients during the follow-up. No differences between the groups were found in the number of disability pensions granted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2148221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 0036-5505


  18 in total

Review 1.  Back Schools for chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Patrícia Parreira; Martijn W Heymans; Maurits W van Tulder; Rosmin Esmail; Bart W Koes; Nolwenn Poquet; Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-03

Review 2.  Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Multidisciplinary treatment rheumatoid arthritis. Statistical and clinical change in pain experience].

Authors:  U Klages
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 4.  Philosophy and efficacy of multidisciplinary approach to chronic pain management.

Authors:  Akiko Okifuji; Dennis C Turk
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  The impact of enrollment in a specialized interdisciplinary neuropathic pain clinic.

Authors:  Alexandra Garven; Shauna Brady; Susan Wood; Melinda Hatfield; Jennifer Bestard; Lawrence Korngut; Cory Toth
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.037

6.  Simple low back pain: rest or active exercise?

Authors:  G Waddell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 7.  Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review.

Authors:  J Guzmán; R Esmail; K Karjalainen; A Malmivaara; E Irvin; C Bombardier
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-23

8.  Effects of occupationally-oriented rehabilitation on farmers' work techniques, musculoskeletal symptoms, and work ability.

Authors:  N Nevala-Puranen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1996-09

Review 9.  Interventions to improve adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults.

Authors:  Joanne L Jordan; Melanie A Holden; Elizabeth Ej Mason; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 10.  Low back pain.

Authors:  A Frank
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.