INTRODUCTION: In order to better understand the impact of high-dose on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of cyclophosphamide, a pharmacological study was performed in children with malignant mesenchymal tumours with metastatic disease. METHODS: Patients received four courses of chemotherapy including two courses of cyclophosphamide. Plasma concentrations of cyclophosphamide and the metabolites 4-ketocyclophosphamide, dechloroethylcyclophosphamide and carboxyphosphamide were determined on days 1, 2 and 3 of each course. A population pharmacokinetic model for cyclophosphamide was developed using non-linear mixed effects modelling and metabolite AUC values were compared between days and courses. RESULTS: Data were available on 21 cyclophosphamide courses from 15 patients. A one compartment model, incorporating a term in surface area for both CL and V, best described cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics. Typical CL and V on day 1 of treatment for a patient with a SA of 1.4m(2) were 4.3 L/h and 28.5L, respectively. On days 2 and 3 CL increased by 88% (95% CI, 72-105%) and 125% (95% CI, 108-145%) over day 1 levels; V increased by 14% (95% CI, 5-23%) on days 2 and 3. V tended to be larger for males than similarly sized females but no effect of age was found upon CL or V. Significant increases in metabolite AUCs were observed on days 2 and 3 compared to day 1 and a significant increase in CXCP AUC from course 1 to course 3. CONCLUSION: Administration of high-dose cyclophosphamide over several days results in an increase in metabolism, possibly by induction of the activation pathway. This induction is effectively reversed following a four week period between cyclophosphamide doses. The degree of intersubject variation in cyclophosphamide elimination is largely accounted for by body surface area and is less than previously reported.
INTRODUCTION: In order to better understand the impact of high-dose on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of cyclophosphamide, a pharmacological study was performed in children with malignant mesenchymal tumours with metastatic disease. METHODS:Patients received four courses of chemotherapy including two courses of cyclophosphamide. Plasma concentrations of cyclophosphamide and the metabolites 4-ketocyclophosphamide, dechloroethylcyclophosphamide and carboxyphosphamide were determined on days 1, 2 and 3 of each course. A population pharmacokinetic model for cyclophosphamide was developed using non-linear mixed effects modelling and metabolite AUC values were compared between days and courses. RESULTS: Data were available on 21 cyclophosphamide courses from 15 patients. A one compartment model, incorporating a term in surface area for both CL and V, best described cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics. Typical CL and V on day 1 of treatment for a patient with a SA of 1.4m(2) were 4.3 L/h and 28.5L, respectively. On days 2 and 3 CL increased by 88% (95% CI, 72-105%) and 125% (95% CI, 108-145%) over day 1 levels; V increased by 14% (95% CI, 5-23%) on days 2 and 3. V tended to be larger for males than similarly sized females but no effect of age was found upon CL or V. Significant increases in metabolite AUCs were observed on days 2 and 3 compared to day 1 and a significant increase in CXCP AUC from course 1 to course 3. CONCLUSION: Administration of high-dose cyclophosphamide over several days results in an increase in metabolism, possibly by induction of the activation pathway. This induction is effectively reversed following a four week period between cyclophosphamide doses. The degree of intersubject variation in cyclophosphamide elimination is largely accounted for by body surface area and is less than previously reported.
Authors: Johan G C van Hasselt; Natasha K A van Eijkelenburg; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Olivia Campagne; Bo Zhong; Sreenath Nair; Tong Lin; Jie Huang; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Giles Robinson; Amar Gajjar; Clinton F Stewart Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-12-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Gareth J Veal; Michael Cole; Girish Chinnaswamy; Julieann Sludden; David Jamieson; Julie Errington; Ghada Malik; Christopher R Hill; Thomas Chamberlain; Alan V Boddy Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Esther Hee; Meng Kang Wong; Sheng Hui Tan; Zhang'E Choo; Chik Hong Kuick; Sharon Ling; Min Hwee Yong; Sudhanshi Jain; Derrick W Q Lian; Eileen H Q Ng; Yvonne F L Yong; Mee Hiong Ren; Nurfarhanah Syed Sulaiman; Sharon Y Y Low; Yong Wei Chua; Muhammad Fahmy Syed; Tony K H Lim; Shui Yen Soh; Prasad Iyer; Michaela S F Seng; Joyce C M Lam; Enrica E K Tan; Mei Yoke Chan; Ah Moy Tan; Yong Chen; Zhixiong Chen; Kenneth T E Chang; Amos Hong Pheng Loh Journal: Cancer Sci Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 6.716