OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to explore the maternal-fetal pharmacokinetics of intraamniotic (IA), intravenous (IV), or intramuscular (IM) administration of erythromycin or azithromycin in a pregnant sheep model. STUDY DESIGN: Pregnant ewes of 115-121 days' gestation received a single maternal IV infusion (5 mg/kg over 60 min), a single IM injection, or a single IA injection (3.2 mg/kg fetal weight) of either erythromycin lactobionate or azithromycin. Maternal/fetal blood and amniotic fluid (AF) samples were collected across 48 h for macrolide assay by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Maternal administration achieved therapeutic maternal plasma macrolide concentrations (≥0.5 μg/mL) with low concentrations in AF equivalent to less than 7% transfer; fetal plasma levels were even lower (<1.5% transfer). The IA administration achieved therapeutic concentrations in AF and sustained for 48 h, with poor maternal-fetal transfer (<1% maternal, <0.3% fetal). Modest pharmacokinetic differences were evident between erythromycin and azithromycin. CONCLUSION: Maternal macrolide administration achieves subtherapeutic concentrations in AF or fetal plasma, whereas a single IA injection achieves therapeutic concentrations in AF but not in maternal-fetal circulations. Combined maternal and single IA administration of macrolides may be a more effective regimen for treatment of intrauterine, but not fetal, infection.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to explore the maternal-fetal pharmacokinetics of intraamniotic (IA), intravenous (IV), or intramuscular (IM) administration of erythromycin or azithromycin in a pregnant sheep model. STUDY DESIGN: Pregnant ewes of 115-121 days' gestation received a single maternal IV infusion (5 mg/kg over 60 min), a single IM injection, or a single IA injection (3.2 mg/kg fetal weight) of either erythromycin lactobionate or azithromycin. Maternal/fetal blood and amniotic fluid (AF) samples were collected across 48 h for macrolide assay by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Maternal administration achieved therapeutic maternal plasma macrolide concentrations (≥0.5 μg/mL) with low concentrations in AF equivalent to less than 7% transfer; fetal plasma levels were even lower (<1.5% transfer). The IA administration achieved therapeutic concentrations in AF and sustained for 48 h, with poor maternal-fetal transfer (<1% maternal, <0.3% fetal). Modest pharmacokinetic differences were evident between erythromycin and azithromycin. CONCLUSION: Maternal macrolide administration achieves subtherapeutic concentrations in AF or fetal plasma, whereas a single IA injection achieves therapeutic concentrations in AF but not in maternal-fetal circulations. Combined maternal and single IA administration of macrolides may be a more effective regimen for treatment of intrauterine, but not fetal, infection.
Authors: Peta L Grigsby; Miles J Novy; Drew W Sadowsky; Terry K Morgan; Mary Long; Ed Acosta; Lynn B Duffy; Ken B Waites Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Matthew W Kemp; Yuichiro Miura; Matthew S Payne; Alan H Jobe; Suhas G Kallapur; Masatoshi Saito; Sarah J Stock; O Brad Spiller; Demelza J Ireland; Nobuo Yaegashi; Michael Clarke; Dorothee Hahne; Jennifer Rodger; Jeffrey A Keelan; John P Newnham Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Yuichiro Miura; Matthew S Payne; Jeffrey A Keelan; Andres Noe; Sean Carter; Rory Watts; Owen B Spiller; Alan H Jobe; Suhas G Kallapur; Masatoshi Saito; Sarah J Stock; John P Newnham; Matthew W Kemp Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: John P Newnham; Jan E Dickinson; Roger J Hart; Craig E Pennell; Catherine A Arrese; Jeffrey A Keelan Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Jeffrey A Keelan; Matthew W Kemp; Matthew S Payne; David Johnson; Sarah J Stock; Masatoshi Saito; Prabhavathi Fernandes; John P Newnham Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jeffrey A Keelan; Matthew S Payne; Matthew W Kemp; Demelza J Ireland; John P Newnham Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 7.561