Literature DB >> 21481828

Relation of fractional flow reserve after drug-eluting stent implantation to one-year outcomes.

Chang-Wook Nam1, Seung-Ho Hur, Yun-Kyeong Cho, Hyoung-Seob Park, Hyuck-Jun Yoon, Hyungseop Kim, In-Sung Chung, Yoon-Nyun Kim, Kwon-Bae Kim, Joon-Hyung Doh, Bon-Kwon Koo, Seung-Jea Tahk, William F Fearon.   

Abstract

Patients still present with drug-eluting stent (DES) failure despite an angiographically successful implantation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relation between the fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured after DES implantation and the clinical outcomes at 1 year. A total of 80 patients (mean age 62 years, 74% men, 99 DESs) underwent coronary pressure measurement at maximum hyperemia after successful DES implantation. The composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization was evaluated at 1 year. The patients were divided into 2 groups (low-FFR group, FFR ≤0.90 and high-FFR group, FFR >0.90) according to the median FFR. The mean poststent percent diameter stenosis was 11 ± 5% in the low-FFR group and 12 ± 3% in the high-FFR group (p = 0.31). Left anterior descending coronary artery lesions were more frequent in the low-FFR group than in the high-FFR group (82% vs 55%, p = 0.02). The mean stent length was greater in the low-FFR group than in the high-FFR group (38 ± 18 vs 28 ± 13 mm, p = 0.01). Six cases (7.5%) of MACE occurred during the 1-year follow-up. The rate of MACE was 12.5% in the low-FFR group and 2.5% in the high-FFR group (p <0.01). Receiver operating characteristic curves revealed 0.90 as the best cutoff of FFR after DES implantation for the prediction of 1-year MACE. In conclusion, a poststent FFR of ≤0.90 correlated with a greater adverse event rate at 1 year.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21481828     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.02.329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  Impact of alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptor blockers on fractional flow reserve and index of microvascular resistance.

Authors:  Emanuele Barbato; Giovanna Sarno; Catalina Trana Berza; Giuseppe Di Gioia; Jozef Bartunek; Marc Vanderheyden; Luigi Di Serafino; William Wijns; Bruno Trimarco; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  The Clinical Significance of Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Chandra P Ojha; Ahmed Ibrahim; Timir K Paul; Venkatachalam Mulukutla; Harsha S Nagarajarao
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Prognostic value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention diastolic pressure ratio.

Authors:  K Masdjedi; L J C van Zandvoort; T Neleman; I Kardys; J Ligthart; W K Den Dekker; R Diletti; F Zijlstra; N M Van Mieghem; J Daemen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.854

Review 4.  Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mathias Wolfrum; Gregor Fahrni; Giovanni Luigi de Maria; Guido Knapp; Nick Curzen; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Georg M Fröhlich; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Lower Level of Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol is Associated with a Higher Increase in the Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Fixed-dose Rosuvastatin.

Authors:  Takehiro Hashikata; Taiki Tojo; Yusuke Muramatsu; Toshimitsu Sato; Ryota Kakizaki; Teruyoshi Nemoto; Kazuhiro Fujiyoshi; Sayaka Namba; Lisa Kitasato; Takuya Hashimoto; Ryo Kameda; Takao Shimohama; Minako Yamaoka-Tojo; Junya Ako
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 4.928

6.  A randomized controlled trial of a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization strategy: Rationale and design of the TARGET FFR study.

Authors:  Damien Collison; John D McClure; Colin Berry; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 7.  Physiologic Assessment after Coronary Stent Implantation.

Authors:  Doyeon Hwang; Seokhun Yang; Jinlong Zhang; Bon Kwon Koo
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.243

8.  Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Doyeon Hwang; Bon-Kwon Koo; Jinlong Zhang; Jiesuck Park; Seokhun Yang; Minsang Kim; Jun Pil Yun; Joo Myung Lee; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Joon-Hyung Doh; Shao-Liang Chen; Tsunekazu Kakuta; Gabor G Toth; Zsolt Piroth; Nils P Johnson; Nico H J Pijls; Abdul Hakeem; Barry F Uretsky; Yohei Hokama; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Hong-Seok Lim; Tsuyoshi Ito; Akiko Matsuo; Lorenzo Azzalini; Massoud A Leesar; Tara Neleman; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Roberto Diletti; Joost Daemen; Damien Collison; Carlos Collet; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01

9.  Invasive and non-invasive fractional flow reserve index in validation of hemodynamic severity of intracoronary lesions.

Authors:  Jarosław Wasilewski; Kryspin Mirota; Michał Hawranek; Lech Poloński
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 1.426

10.  Virtual Coronary Intervention: A Treatment Planning Tool Based Upon the Angiogram.

Authors:  Rebecca C Gosling; Paul D Morris; Daniel A Silva Soto; Patricia V Lawford; D Rodney Hose; Julian P Gunn
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.