Literature DB >> 21481132

Prostate-specific antigen testing rates remain low in UK general practice: a cross-sectional study in six English cities.

Naomi Williams1, Laura J Hughes, Emma L Turner, Jenny L Donovan, Freddie C Hamdy, David E Neal, Richard M Martin, Chris Metcalfe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE • To estimate rates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in UK general practices by age, deprivation index and geographical location. SUBJECTS AND METHODS • Practice-based, retrospective data on PSA testing patterns in 2007 were collected from a random sample of 87 general practices using EMIS LV computer systems within the passively observed non-intervention arm of a cluster-randomized controlled trial. • Information for a total of 126 716 men aged 45-89 years with no recorded diagnosis of prostate cancer prior to 1 January 2007 was collected. RESULTS • In all, 7902 (6.2%) of 126 716 men aged 45-89 without a prior diagnosis of prostate cancer underwent at least one PSA test from their general practitioner during 2007 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.6-7.0%; practice-based inter-quartile range 3.6-8.4%]. • PSA testing rates were 1.4% (95% CI 1.1-1.6%) in men aged 45-49, rising to 11.3% (95% CI 10.0-12.9%) at age 75-79 years (P for trend <0.001). • Testing rates were lowest in the three northern centres (3.5-5.7%) vs the three more southern centres (7.1-8.9%; P < 0.001). • For every 20 points increase in the index of multiple deprivation score, the proportion of men tested fell by 1.7% (95% CI -2.5 to -0.8%; P < 0.001). • Lower proportions of men were subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer in practices testing more men (odds ratio for a one unit increase in the natural log of testing 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.97; P= 0.025). CONCLUSION • Overall levels of PSA testing in UK general practice remain low, but for those tested there are important variations by age, deprivation and geographical location that do not appear to reflect clinical need or the intention of current policy. • PSA testing in general practice is currently skewed towards older men, and current policy enabling all men to make an informed choice about PSA testing is not being effectively implemented as uptake clearly varies by socioeconomic status. • This reinforces the need for robust evidence regarding the costs and benefits of using the PSA test for the detection of localized prostate cancer in the UK, a full assessment of the health economic implications and a revision of the current policy.
© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21481132     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10163.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  32 in total

1.  Prostate cancer incidence in 43 populations worldwide: An analysis of time trends overall and by age group.

Authors:  Cindy Ke Zhou; David P Check; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Mathieu Laversanne; Ahmedin Jemal; Jacques Ferlay; Freddie Bray; Michael B Cook; Susan S Devesa
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Richard M Martin; Jenny L Donovan; Emma L Turner; Chris Metcalfe; Grace J Young; Eleanor I Walsh; J Athene Lane; Sian Noble; Steven E Oliver; Simon Evans; Jonathan A C Sterne; Peter Holding; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Peter Brindle; Naomi J Williams; Elizabeth M Hill; Siaw Yein Ng; Jessica Toole; Marta K Tazewell; Laura J Hughes; Charlotte F Davies; Joanna C Thorn; Elizabeth Down; George Davey Smith; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Association of Treatment With 5α-Reductase Inhibitors With Time to Diagnosis and Mortality in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Reith R Sarkar; J Kellog Parsons; Alex K Bryant; Stephen T Ryan; Andrew K Kader; Rana R McKay; Anthony V D'Amico; Paul L Nguyen; Benjamin J Hulley; John P Einck; Arno J Mundt; Christopher J Kane; James D Murphy; Brent S Rose
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  J L Donovan; F C Hamdy; J A Lane; D E Neal; M Mason; C Metcalfe; E Walsh; J M Blazeby; T J Peters; P Holding; S Bonnington; T Lennon; L Bradshaw; D Cooper; P Herbert; J Howson; A Jones; N Lyons; E Salter; P Thompson; S Tidball; J Blaikie; C Gray; P Bollina; J Catto; A Doble; A Doherty; D Gillatt; R Kockelbergh; H Kynaston; A Paul; P Powell; S Prescott; D J Rosario; E Rowe; M Davis; E L Turner; R M Martin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Association between inflammatory bowel disease and prostate cancer: A large-scale, prospective, population-based study.

Authors:  Travis J Meyers; Adam B Weiner; Rebecca E Graff; Anuj S Desai; Lauren Folgosa Cooley; William J Catalona; Stephen B Hanauer; Jennifer D Wu; Edward M Schaeffer; Sarki A Abdulkadir; Shilajit D Kundu; John S Witte
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: the ProtecT three-arm RCT.

Authors:  Freddie C Hamdy; Jenny L Donovan; J Athene Lane; Malcolm Mason; Chris Metcalfe; Peter Holding; Julia Wade; Sian Noble; Kirsty Garfield; Grace Young; Michael Davis; Tim J Peters; Emma L Turner; Richard M Martin; Jon Oxley; Mary Robinson; John Staffurth; Eleanor Walsh; Jane Blazeby; Richard Bryant; Prasad Bollina; James Catto; Andrew Doble; Alan Doherty; David Gillatt; Vincent Gnanapragasam; Owen Hughes; Roger Kockelbergh; Howard Kynaston; Alan Paul; Edgar Paez; Philip Powell; Stephen Prescott; Derek Rosario; Edward Rowe; David Neal
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  [Rates of prostate-specific antigen testing for early detection of prostate cancer: a first comparison of German results with current international data].

Authors:  S Lebentrau; M May; O Maurer; M Schostak; M Lehsnau; T Ecke; S Al-Dumaini; S Hallmann; A M Ahmed; V Braun; A Haferkamp; R M Bauer; C G Stief; D Baumunk; B Hoschke; H-P Braun; C Schäfer; M Hipp; J Maurer; K-P Braun; I Wolff; S Brookman-May; C Gilfrich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Socio-demographic inequalities in stage of cancer diagnosis: evidence from patients with female breast, lung, colon, rectal, prostate, renal, bladder, melanoma, ovarian and endometrial cancer.

Authors:  G Lyratzopoulos; G A Abel; C H Brown; B A Rous; S A Vernon; M Roland; D C Greenberg
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Predicting high-grade cancer at ten-core prostate biopsy using four kallikrein markers measured in blood in the ProtecT study.

Authors:  Richard J Bryant; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Mary C Robinson; Rajeev Kumar; Luke Marsden; Michael Davis; Peter T Scardino; Jenny Donovan; David E Neal; Hans Lilja; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Germline BRCA mutations are associated with higher risk of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, and poor survival outcomes in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elena Castro; Chee Goh; David Olmos; Ed Saunders; Daniel Leongamornlert; Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz; Nadiya Mahmud; Tokhir Dadaev; Koveela Govindasami; Michelle Guy; Emma Sawyer; Rosemary Wilkinson; Audrey Ardern-Jones; Steve Ellis; Debra Frost; Susan Peock; D Gareth Evans; Marc Tischkowitz; Trevor Cole; Rosemarie Davidson; Diana Eccles; Carole Brewer; Fiona Douglas; Mary E Porteous; Alan Donaldson; Huw Dorkins; Louise Izatt; Jackie Cook; Shirley Hodgson; M John Kennedy; Lucy E Side; Jacqueline Eason; Alex Murray; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.