Literature DB >> 21481121

Insulin delivery by injection in children and adolescents with diabetes.

Ragnar Hanas1, Carine de Beaufort, Hilary Hoey, Barbara Anderson.   

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes is treated with insulin, which has traditionally been delivered by vial and syringe. However, for many patients, dosing inaccuracy, pain, anxiety, inconvenience, and social acceptability present barriers to this method of administration (1-5). This has contributed to the increased popularity of alternative insulin delivery systems, including pen delivery devices (4, 6). Evidence suggests that discreet devices, such as insulin pens, facilitate adherence to intensive insulin therapy regimens, help improve lifestyle flexibility, and reduce injection pain compared with the conventional syringe-based regimens, as shown in studies in adults and adolescents (7). In addition, compared with the vial and syringe method of insulin administration, pens may provide more accurate dosing - which is particularly important in children - thereby improving short-term blood glucose control and potentially improving long-term outcomes (5, 8). Children, in particular, may benefit from insulin pens that are simple to use as adherence issues may be more evident in this patient group (9). Pens for insulin delivery in children with type 1 diabetes have been used for a long time in Europe, and have recently gained in popularity in many other places around the world (4, 10). Furthermore, the conventional vial and syringe method of insulin delivery is beginning to be considered as obsolete (11). Moreover, there is a continued drive to improve insulin pen technology, to refine and enhance the functionality and usability of these pens. However, despite recent advances in pen design and function, the selection of pens available especially for children is limited.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21481121     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00731.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes        ISSN: 1399-543X            Impact factor:   4.866


  7 in total

Review 1.  Use of technology when assessing adherence to diabetes self-management behaviors.

Authors:  Kimberly A Driscoll; Deborah Young-Hyman
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Half-Unit Insulin Pens: Disease Management in Patients With Diabetes Who Are Sensitive to Insulin.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Irina Nayberg; Udo Stauder; Hamid Oualali; Catherine Domenger
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-28

3.  Analysis of "Dose Accuracy, Injection Force, and Usability Assessment of a New Half-Unit, Prefilled Insulin Pen".

Authors:  Mallika Bariya; Irina Nayberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-12-27

4.  Treating psychological insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Nancy A Allen; Sofija E Zagarins; Rebecca G Feinberg; Garry Welch
Journal:  J Clin Transl Endocrinol       Date:  2016-11-30

5.  Dose Accuracy, Injection Force, and Usability Assessment of a New Half-Unit, Prefilled Insulin Pen.

Authors:  Christopher M Kappes; James R Kershner; Tina M Morwick; Sheila M Corrigan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-10-30

Review 6.  Insulin-delivery methods for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Zavuga Zuberi; Elingarami Sauli; Liu Cun; Jing Deng; Wen-Jun Li; Xu-Liang He; Wen Li
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.565

7.  Peptidome Analysis of Pancreatic Tissue Derived from T1DM Mice: Insights into the Pathogenesis and Clinical Treatments of T1DM.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Meiyun Zhou; Shuangshuang Li; Jinhua Gu; Yuanyuan Qian; Sisi He; Li Hong; Linlin Sun; Xiaohua Zhang; Weigang Ji
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.