Literature DB >> 21481013

Postoperative renal function after partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease: a comparison with radical nephrectomy.

Toshio Takagi1, Tsunenori Kondo, Jyunpei Iizuka, Hirohito Kobayashi, Yasunobu Hashimoto, Hayakazu Nakazawa, Fumio Ito, Kazunari Tanabe.   

Abstract

We assessed whether adequately functioning parenchyma is preserved in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD) after partial nephrectomy (PN) compared with those who underwent radical nephrectomy (RN). A total of 95 patients with pre-existing CKD who underwent curative surgery for pathological T1a-T2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma with a follow-up period of 12 months or more were the subject of the present study. Of these, 51 patients underwent RN, and 44 PN. Renal function was assessed by using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR). We classified the subjects into two groups according to the preoperative e-GFR: preoperative e-GFR 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (68 patients); and 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (27 patients). In the former group, the probability of freedom from new onset of e-GFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) stemmed from the significant difference between the PN and RN groups (P = 0.006; PN: 2 years 64%; RN: 2 years 22%). In contrast, in the latter group, the probability of freedom from new onset of e-GFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was not associated with a significant difference between PN and RN group (P = 0.80). Overall survival and the number of the patients who went on to develop end-stage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapy between PN and RN were not significantly different in each group. Death from renal cell carcinoma was not noted in either group. PN could significantly prevent development to late-stage CKD in patients with preoperative e-GFR 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m(2) compared with RN. Patients with preoperative e-GFR 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m(2) should be reviewed in a more strict study.
© 2011 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21481013     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02765.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  4 in total

Review 1.  Renal Functional Outcomes after Surgery, Ablation, and Active Surveillance of Localized Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hiten D Patel; Phillip M Pierorazio; Michael H Johnson; Ritu Sharma; Emmanuel Iyoha; Mohamad E Allaf; Eric B Bass; Stephen M Sozio
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses.

Authors:  Frank Kunath; Stefanie Schmidt; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Arkadiusz Miernik; Philipp Dahm; Anne Cleves; Mario Walther; Nils Kroeger
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-09

3.  Retrospective analysis of the predictive factors of renal function loss after uninephrectomy in patients with chronic kidney disease G3 to G5.

Authors:  Dominique Dupuis; Georges Ouellet; Louise Roy
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2015-12-11

4.  Impact of partial nephrectomy on kidney function in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Chang Seong Kim; Eun Hui Bae; Seong Kwon Ma; Sun-Seog Kweon; Soo Wan Kim
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.388

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.