Literature DB >> 21480935

Clinical predictors of poor outcomes among patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Europe.

A Lanas1, L Aabakken, J Fonseca, Z A Mungan, G V Papatheodoridis, H Piessevaux, L Cipolletta, J Nuevo, M Tafalla.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a common medical emergency associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in endoscopic and pharmacological treatment during the past two decades, the incidence of mortality associated with NVUGIB has remained relatively constant. AIM: To report outcomes and predictive factors for bleeding continuation/re-bleeding and mortality of NVUGIB in clinical practice in different European countries.
METHODS: This observational, retrospective cohort study (NCT00797641; ENERGIB) was conducted in Belgium, Greece, Italy, Norway, Portugal, Spain and Turkey. Eligible patients were hospitalised (new admissions or inpatients), presenting with overt NVUGIB with endoscopy from 1 October to 30 November, 2008. Patients were managed according to routine care, and data regarding bleeding continuation/re-bleeding, pharmacological treatment, surgery and mortality during 30-days after the initial bleed were collected. A multivariate analysis of clinical factors predictive of poor outcomes was conducted.
RESULTS: Overall, 2660 patients (64.7% men; mean age 67.7 years) were evaluable. Significant differences across countries in bleeding continuation/re-bleeding (range: 9-15.8%) or death (2.5-8%) at 30 days were explained by clinical factors (number of comorbidities, age > 65 years, history of bleeding ulcers, in-hospital bleeding, type of lesion or type of concomitant medication). Other factors (country, size of hospital, profile of team managing the event, or endoscopic/pharmacological therapy received) did not affect these outcomes. Similar predictors were observed in patients with high-risk stigmata.
CONCLUSION: Differences in the outcomes of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in clinical practice across some European countries are explained mainly by patient-related factors, and not by management factors.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21480935     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04651.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  15 in total

1.  Prediction scores or gastroenterologists' Gut Feeling for triaging patients that present with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Nl de Groot; Mgh van Oijen; K Kessels; M Hemmink; Blam Weusten; R Timmer; Wl Hazen; N van Lelyveld; Wl Curvers; Lc Baak; R Verburg; Jh Bosman; Lrh de Wijkerslooth; J de Rooij; Ng Venneman; M Pennings; K van Hee; Rch Scheffer; Rl van Eijk; R Meiland; Pd Siersema; Aj Bredenoord
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Volume of hospital is important for the prognosis of high-risk patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB).

Authors:  Jin Woo Choi; Seong Woo Jeon; Jung Gu Kwon; Dong Wook Lee; Chang Yoon Ha; Kwang Bum Cho; Byung Ik Jang; Jung Bae Park; Youn Sun Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Is the AIMS65 score useful in predicting outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding?

Authors:  Sung Hoon Jung; Jung Hwan Oh; Hye Yeon Lee; Joon Won Jeong; Se Eun Go; Chan Ran You; Eun Jung Jeon; Sang Wook Choi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Regional differences in outcomes of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Saskatchewan.

Authors:  Michael O'Byrne; Erin L Smith-Windsor; Chris R Kenyon; Sanchit Bhasin; Jennifer L Jones
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-03

5.  Aspirin Has a Protective Effect Against Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Antonios Wehbeh; Hani M Tamim; Hussein Abu Daya; Rachel Abou Mrad; Rami J Badreddine; Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Don C Rockey; Kassem Barada
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Outcomes of Hemospray therapy in the treatment of intraprocedural upper gastrointestinal bleeding post-endoscopic therapy.

Authors:  Mohamed Hussein; Durayd Alzoubaidi; Alvaro de la Serna; Michael Weaver; Jacobo O Fernandez-Sordo; Johannes W Rey; Bu'Hussain Hayee; Edward Despott; Alberto Murino; Sulleman Moreea; Phil Boger; Jason Dunn; Inder Mainie; David Graham; Dan Mullady; Dayna Early; Krish Ragunath; John Anderson; Pradeep Bhandari; Martin Goetz; Ralf Kiesslich; Emmanuel Coron; Enrique R de Santiago; Tamas Gonda; Laurence B Lovat; Rehan Haidry
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  Aspirin use for primary prophylaxis: Adverse outcomes in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Karina M Souk; Hani M Tamim; Hussein A Abu Daya; Don C Rockey; Kassem A Barada
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-27

8.  [Bleeding origin, patient-related risk factors, and prognostic indicators in patients with acute gastrointestinal hemorrhages requiring intensive care treatment. A retrospective analysis from 1999 to 2010].

Authors:  A Koch; L Buendgens; H Dückers; J Bruensing; M Matthes; J Kunze; H H Lutz; T Luedde; J J W Tischendorf; C Trautwein; F Tacke
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 0.840

9.  Prevention and Treatment of NSAID Gastropathy.

Authors:  Carla J Gargallo; Carlos Sostres; Angel Lanas
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12

10.  Prognosis following upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Stephen E Roberts; Lori A Button; John G Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.