Literature DB >> 21480777

Survival and success rates of immediately and early loaded implants: 12-month results from a multicentric randomized clinical study.

Tommaso Grandi1, Giovanna Garuti, Paolo Guazzi, Luciano Tarabini, Andrea Forabosco.   

Abstract

Our objective was to compare survival and peri-implant bone levels of immediately nonocclusally vs early loaded implants in partially edentulous patients up to 12 months after implant placement. Eighty patients (inclusion criteria: general good health, good oral hygiene, 30-65 years old; exclusion criteria: head and neck irradiation/cancer, pregnancy, uncontrolled diabetes, substance abuse, bruxism, lack of opposing occluding dentition, smokers >10 cigarettes/day, need for bone augmentation procedures) were selected in 5 Italian study centers and randomized into 2 groups: 40 patients in the immediately loaded group (minimal insertion torque 30 Ncm) and 40 patients in the early loaded group. Immediately loaded implants were provided with nonoccluding temporary restorations. Final restorations were provided 2 months later. Early loaded implants were provided with a definitive restoration after 2 months. Peri-implant bone resorption was evaluated radiographically with software (ImageJ 1.42). No dropout occurred. Both groups gradually lost peri-implant bone. After 12 months, patients of both groups lost an average of 0.4 mm of peri-implant bone. There were no statistically significant differences (evaluated with t test) between the 2 loading strategies for peri-implant bone level changes at 2 (P = .6730), 6 (P = .6613) and 12 (P = .5957) months or for survival rates (100% in both groups). If adequate primary stability is achieved, immediate loading of dental implants can provide similar success rates, survival rates, and peri-implant bone resorption as compared with early loading, as evaluated in the present study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21480777     DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of basal implants in compromised ridges.

Authors:  M Anuradha; Harsha V Babaji; Neel V Hiremath; V A Usha; Arunoday Kumar; Tanya Nandkeoliar; Sankalp Verma
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-04-30

2.  Tardive Dyskinesia, Oral Parafunction, and Implant-Supported Rehabilitation.

Authors:  S Lumetti; G Ghiacci; G M Macaluso; M Amore; C Galli; E Calciolari; E Manfredi
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-12-06

Review 3.  Marginal bone loss 1 year after implantation: a systematic review for fixed and removable restorations.

Authors:  Jennifer Zimmermann; Melanie Sommer; Leticia Grize; Stefan Stubinger
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2019-07-16

4.  A randomized clinical study to compare implant stability and bone loss using early loading protocol in two implant systems with different design.

Authors:  Rani Ranabhatt; Kamleshwar Singh; Ramashanker Siddharth; Shuchi Tripathi; Deeksha Arya
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar

5.  Importance of a distal proximal contact on load transfer by implant-supported single adjacent crowns in posterior region of the mandible: a photoelastic study.

Authors:  Fábio Afrânio de Aguiar Júnior; Rodrigo Tiossi; Ana Paula Macedo; Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos; Ricardo Faria Ribeiro; Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Using Resonance Frequency Analysis to Compare Delayed and Immediate Progressive Loading for Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mohammed Jasim Al Juboori; Mohammed Ahmed Al Attas; Raquel Zita Gomes; Basma Fathi Alanbari
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2018-10-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.