Literature DB >> 21480315

Genotype differences in susceptibility and resistance development of hepatitis C virus to protease inhibitors telaprevir (VX-950) and danoprevir (ITMN-191).

Ingrid Imhof1, Peter Simmonds.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Protease inhibitors (PIs) have proven to be effective adjuncts to interferon/ribavirin treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. Little clinical or in vitro data exists, however, on their effectiveness for nontype 1 genotypes that predominate in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and most of Asia. NS3 protease and NS4A genes from genotypes 1-6 were inserted into the JFH clone to generate replication-competent intergenotype chimeras. Susceptibility to PIs was determined by replication and infectivity assays. To study resistance development, chimeras were cultured in subinhibitory concentrations of PIs and mutations phenotypically characterized. Marked differences in susceptibility of different genotypes to danoprevir (ITMN-191) and telaprevir (VX-950) were observed. Genotypes 1, 4, and 6 showed median inhibitory concentration (IC(50) ) values of 2-3 nM, >100-fold lower than genotypes 2/3/5 (250-750 nM). Telaprevir susceptibilities varied over a 4-fold range, with genotypes 1 and 2 being most susceptible and genotypes 4 and 5 most resistant. Culture of genotypes 1-6 in PIs induced numerous mutations in the NS3 protease domain, highly variable between genotypes. Introduction of danoprevir and BILN 2061-induced mutations into the original clones by site-directed mutagenesis (n = 29) all conferred resistant phenotypes, with particularly large increases (1-2 log greater IC(50) values) in the initially susceptible genotypes 1/4/6. Most introduced mutations and showed little or no effect on replicative fitness.
CONCLUSION: Major differences were found between genotypes in their susceptibility and resistance development to PIs. However, equal sensitivities of genotypes 1, 4, and 6 to danoprevir and a broader efficacy range of telaprevir between genotypes than initially conceptualized provide strong evidence that PIs might be effectively used beyond their genotype 1 target group. 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21480315     DOI: 10.1002/hep.24172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  27 in total

Review 1.  Hepatitis C virus resistance to new specifically-targeted antiviral therapy: A public health perspective.

Authors:  Karina Salvatierra; Sabrina Fareleski; Alicia Forcada; F Xavier López-Labrador
Journal:  World J Virol       Date:  2013-02-12

2.  PCR-based in vitro synthesis of hepatitis C virus NS3 protease for rapid phenotypic resistance testing of protease inhibitors.

Authors:  Jinjuan Qiao; Junping Yu; Hang Yang; Hongping Wei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Is hepatitis C subtyping still relevant in the era of direct-acting antiviral therapy?

Authors:  Mohammed Eslam; Jacob George
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 6.047

4.  Efficient replication of genotype 3a and 4a hepatitis C virus replicons in human hepatoma cells.

Authors:  Mohsan Saeed; Troels K H Scheel; Judith M Gottwein; Svetlana Marukian; Lynn B Dustin; Jens Bukh; Charles M Rice
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Identification of the NS5B S282T resistant variant and two novel amino acid substitutions that affect replication capacity in hepatitis C virus-infected patients treated with mericitabine and danoprevir.

Authors:  Xiao Tong; Lewyn Li; Kristin Haines; Isabel Najera
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  NS3 protease inhibitors for treatment of chronic hepatitis C: Efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Igor Bakulin; Victor Pasechnikov; Anna Varlamicheva; Irina Sannikova
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-05-27

7.  HCV genotype 1 subtypes (1a and 1b): similarities and differences in clinical features and therapeutic outcome.

Authors:  A Andriulli; F Morisco; A M Ippolito; V Di Marco; M R Valvano; M Angelico; G Fattovich; R Granata; A Smedile; M Milella; M Felder; G B Gaeta; P Gatti; M Fasano; G Mazzella; T Santantonio
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 8.  Telaprevir: a review of its use in the management of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Substitutions at NS3 Residue 155, 156, or 168 of Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes 2 to 6 Induce Complex Patterns of Protease Inhibitor Resistance.

Authors:  Sanne B Jensen; Stéphanie B N Serre; Daryl G Humes; Santseharay Ramirez; Yi-Ping Li; Jens Bukh; Judith M Gottwein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Safety of telaprevir for chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Huimin Qin; Hongtao Li; Xiaolin Zhou; Fang Feng; Yanbing Shen; Hongku Tan; Feng Ye; Yingchun Xie
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.