Literature DB >> 21479928

Use it or lose it? Lessons learned from the developing brains of children who are deaf and use cochlear implants to hear.

K A Gordon1, D D E Wong, J Valero, S F Jewell, P Yoo, B C Papsin.   

Abstract

In the present paper, we review what is currently known about the effects of deafness on the developing human auditory system and ask: Without use, does the immature auditory system lose the ability to normally function and mature? Any change to the structure or function of the auditory pathways resulting from a lack of activity will have important implications for future use through an auditory prosthesis such as a cochlear implant. Data to date show that deafness in children arrests and disrupts normal auditory development. Multiple changes to the auditory pathways occur during the period of deafness with the extent and type of change being dependent upon the age and stage of auditory development at onset of deafness, the cause or type of deafness, and the length of time the immature auditory pathways are left without significant input. Structural changes to the auditory nerve, brainstem, and cortex have been described in animal models of deafness as well in humans who are deaf. Functional changes in deaf auditory pathways have been evaluated by using a cochlear implant to stimulate the auditory nerve with electrical pulses. Studies of electrically evoked activity in the immature deaf auditory system have demonstrated that auditory brainstem development is arrested and that thalamo-cortical areas are vulnerable to being taken over by other competitive inputs (cross-modal plasticity). Indeed, enhanced peripheral sight and detection of visual movement in congenitally deaf cats and adults have been linked to activity in specific areas of what would normally be auditory cortex. Cochlear implants can stimulate developmental plasticity in the auditory brainstem even after many years of deafness in childhood but changes in the auditory cortex are limited, at least in part, by the degree of reorganization which occurred during the period of deafness. Consequently, we must identify hearing loss rapidly (i.e., at birth for congenital deficits) and provide cochlear implants to appropriate candidates as soon as possible. Doing so has facilitated auditory development in the thalamo-cortex and allowed children who are deaf to perceive and use spoken language.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21479928     DOI: 10.1007/s10548-011-0181-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  20 in total

Review 1.  Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  N T Jiam; M Caldwell; M L Deroche; M Chatterjee; C J Limb
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Listening comprehension in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants: the role of auditory perception and foundational linguistic and cognitive skills.

Authors:  Maria Nicastri; Giovanni Ruoppolo; Letizia Guerzoni; Domenico Cuda; Ilaria Giallini; Chiara Cocchi; Marco de Vincentiis; Antonio Greco; Patrizia Mancini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Spoken language benefits of extending cochlear implant candidacy below 12 months of age.

Authors:  Johanna G Nicholas; Ann E Geers
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Stability and plasticity of auditory brainstem function across the lifespan.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Jennifer Krizman; Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Assessing the Benefit-Risk Profile for Pediatric Implantable Auditory Prostheses.

Authors:  Laurel M Fisher; Amy S Martinez; Frances J Richmond; Mark D Krieger; Eric P Wilkinson; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 1.778

6.  Parameter-Specific Morphing Reveals Contributions of Timbre to the Perception of Vocal Emotions in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Celina I von Eiff; Verena G Skuk; Romi Zäske; Christine Nussbaum; Sascha Frühholz; Ute Feuer; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Stefan R Schweinberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 7.  Cochlear implantation (CI) for prelingual deafness: the relevance of studies of brain organization and the role of first language acquisition in considering outcome success.

Authors:  Ruth Campbell; Mairéad MacSweeney; Bencie Woll
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Art and science: how musical training shapes the brain.

Authors:  Karen Chan Barrett; Richard Ashley; Dana L Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-16

9.  Musical training heightens auditory brainstem function during sensitive periods in development.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-19

Review 10.  Benefits and detriments of unilateral cochlear implant use on bilateral auditory development in children who are deaf.

Authors:  Karen A Gordon; Salima Jiwani; Blake C Papsin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.