Literature DB >> 21479770

High-risk offenders participating in court-supervised substance abuse treatment: characteristics, treatment received, and factors associated with recidivism.

Elizabeth Evans1, David Huang, Yih-Ing Hser.   

Abstract

High-risk offenders treated by California's Proposition 36 court-supervised drug treatment initiative account for a disproportionate number of re-arrests (Hawken 2008) undermining the many successes of the program, yet little is known about their characteristics, treatment experiences, or factors that influence re-arrest. To better understand this group, self-reported and administrative data were analyzed on 78 high-risk (five or more convictions in the previous 5 years) and 1,009 low-risk offenders enrolled during 2004. At intake, high-risk offenders were younger, more were male, and more had prior contact with psychiatric and criminal justice systems. Treatment received and the proportion recidivated during the 30-months after treatment assessment were similar across groups, but high-risk offenders had a greater number of re-arrests. The number of re-arrests was increased by high-risk classification, but decreased by receipt of more treatment services and longer treatment length. Moreover, the number of re-arrests was highest among high-risk offenders with shorter treatment lengths, whereas it was similar to that among low-risk offenders if treatment length was longer. To reduce recidivism among high-risk offenders in court-supervised drug treatment, consideration of psychiatric problems and criminal history is needed, as is receipt of sufficient treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21479770      PMCID: PMC3170514          DOI: 10.1007/s11414-011-9241-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1094-3412            Impact factor:   1.505


  39 in total

1.  Responsivity: the value of providing intensive services to high-risk offenders.

Authors:  Meridith H Thanner; Faye S Taxman
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2003-03

2.  Benefit-cost in the California treatment outcome project: does substance abuse treatment "pay for itself"?

Authors:  Susan L Ettner; David Huang; Elizabeth Evans; Danielle Rose Ash; Mary Hardy; Mickel Jourabchi; Yih-Ing Hser
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The effectiveness of drug treatment programs in reducing criminal behavior: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katy R Holloway; Trevor H Bennett; David P Farrington
Journal:  Psicothema       Date:  2006-08

4.  Matching Judicial Supervision to Clients' Risk Status in Drug Court.

Authors:  Douglas B Marlowe; David S Festinger; Patricia A Lee; Karen L Dugosh; Kathleen M Benasutti
Journal:  Crime Delinq       Date:  2006

5.  Cross-system data linkage for treatment outcome evaluation: lessons learned from the California Treatment Outcome Project.

Authors:  Yih-Ing Hser; Elizabeth Evans
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2008-02-19

6.  Comparative Effectiveness of California's Proposition 36 and Drug Court Programs Before and After Propensity Score Matching.

Authors:  Elizabeth Evans; Libo Li; Darren Urada; M Douglas Anglin
Journal:  Crime Delinq       Date:  2014-09

7.  Pretreatment and during treatment risk factors for dropout among patients with substance use disorders.

Authors:  John McKellar; John Kelly; Alex Harris; Rudolf Moos
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Treatment for persons with substance use disorders: mediators, moderators, and the need for a new research approach.

Authors:  Thomas F Babor
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.035

9.  Predictors of short-term treatment outcomes among California's Proposition 36 participants.

Authors:  Yih-Ing Hser; Elizabeth Evans; Cheryl Teruya; David Huang; M Douglas Anglin
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2007-01-26

10.  Client and program factors associated with dropout from court mandated drug treatment.

Authors:  Elizabeth Evans; Libo Li; Yih-Ing Hser
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2008-12-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  The Influence of Client Risks and Treatment Engagement on Recidivism.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Kevin Knight; George W Joe; Grace A Rowan-Szal; Wayne E K Lehman; Patrick M Flynn
Journal:  J Offender Rehabil       Date:  2013-10-28

2.  Criminal justice outcomes after engagement in outpatient substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  Deborah W Garnick; Constance M Horgan; Andrea Acevedo; Margaret T Lee; Lee Panas; Grant A Ritter; Robert Dunigan; Alfred Bidorini; Kevin Campbell; Karin Haberlin; Alice Huber; Dawn Lambert-Wacey; Tracy Leeper; Mark Reynolds; David Wright
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2013-10-14

3.  Gender as a moderator in predicting re-arrest among treated drug-involved offenders.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Kevin Knight; George W Joe; Grace A Rowan; Wayne E K Lehman; Patrick M Flynn
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2014-08-07

Review 4.  Treating substance use disorders in the criminal justice system.

Authors:  Steven Belenko; Matthew Hiller; Leah Hamilton
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Risk factors for criminal recidivism - a prospective follow-up study in prisoners with substance abuse.

Authors:  Anders Håkansson; Mats Berglund
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.630

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.