Literature DB >> 21478791

The impact of mechanical ventilation time before initiation of extracorporeal life support on survival in pediatric respiratory failure: a review of the Extracorporeal Life Support Registry.

Michele B Domico1, Deborah A Ridout, Ronald Bronicki, Nick G Anas, John Patrick Cleary, James Cappon, Allan P Goldman, Katherine L Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between duration of mechanical ventilation before the initiation of extracorporeal life support and the survival rate in children with respiratory failure. Extracorporeal life support has been used as a rescue therapy for >30 yrs in children with severe respiratory failure. Previous studies suggest patients who received >7-10 days of mechanical ventilation were not acceptable extracorporeal life support candidates as a result of irreversible lung damage.
DESIGN: A retrospective review encompassing the past 10 yrs of the International Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry (January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2008).
SETTING: Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry database. PATIENTS: A total of 1325 children (≥ 30 days and ≤ 18 yrs) met inclusion criteria.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The following pre-extracorporeal life support variables were identified as independently and significantly related to the chance of survival: 1) >14 days of ventilation vs. 0-7 days was adverse (odds ratio, 0.32; p < .001); 2) the presence of a cardiac arrest was adverse (odds ratio, 0.56; p = .001); 3) pH per 0.1-unit increase was protective (odds ratio, 1.15; p < .001); 4) oxygenation index, per 10-unit increase was adverse (odds ratio, 0.95; p = .002); and 5) any diagnosis other than sepsis was related to a more favorable outcome. Patients requiring >7-10 or >10-14 days of pre-extracorporeal life support ventilation did not have a statistically significant decrease in survival as compared with patients who received 0-7 days.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a clear relationship between the number of mechanical ventilation days before the initiation of extracorporeal life support and survival. However; there was no statistically significant decrease in survival until >14 days of pre-extracorporeal life support ventilation was reached regardless of underlying diagnosis. We found no evidence to suggest that prolonged mechanical ventilation should be considered as a contraindication to extracorporeal life support in children with respiratory failure before 14 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21478791     DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182192c66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  9 in total

1.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Neonates with Congenital Renal and Urological Anomalies and Pulmonary Hypoplasia: A Case Report and Review of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry.

Authors:  Dayanand Bagdure; Natalie Torres; L Kyle Walker; Jaylyn Waddell; Adnan Bhutta; Jason W Custer
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2017-02-06

2.  Interhospital transfer of children in respiratory failure: a clinician interview qualitative study.

Authors:  Folafoluwa O Odetola; Renee R Anspach; Yong Y Han; Sarah J Clark
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.425

3.  Outcomes of pediatric patients with abdominal sepsis requiring surgery and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization database.

Authors:  Michael R Phillips; Amal L Khoury; Briana J K Stephenson; Lloyd J Edwards; Anthony G Charles; Sean E McLean
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.

Authors:  R P Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Diverse Morbidity and Mortality Among Infants Treated with Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Sigrid Bairdain; Peter Betit; Nancy Craig; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Peter Rycus; Jay M Wilson; Ravi Thiagarajan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-04-07

6.  Differential Effects of Endotracheal Suctioning on Gas Exchanges in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure under Pressure-Controlled and Volume-Controlled Ventilation.

Authors:  Xiao-Wei Liu; Yan Jin; Tao Ma; Bo Qu; Zhi Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pediatric necrotizing pneumonia due to Streptococcus pneumonia and influenza H1N1 co-infection: how long should we wait for native lung recovery?

Authors:  Gerard Cortina; Christian Niederwanger; Uwe Klingkowski; Corinna Velik-Salchner; Nikolaus Neu
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 8.  Extracorporeal Life Support: Four Decades and Counting.

Authors:  Omar S Alibrahim; Christopher M B Heard
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2017-04-12

Review 9.  Pediatric and neonatal extracorporeal life support: current state and continuing evolution.

Authors:  Brian P Fallon; Samir K Gadepalli; Ronald B Hirschl
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 1.827

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.