Literature DB >> 21478460

Positive and negative selection in murine ultraconserved noncoding elements.

Daniel L Halligan1, Fiona Oliver, Jack Guthrie, Kathryn C Stemshorn, Bettina Harr, Peter D Keightley.   

Abstract

There are many more selectively constrained noncoding than coding nucleotides in the mammalian genome, but most mammalian noncoding DNA is subject to weak selection, on average. One of the most striking discoveries to have emerged from comparisons among mammalian genomes is the hundreds of noncoding elements of more than 200 bp in length that show absolute conservation among mammalian orders. These elements represent the tip of the iceberg of a much larger class of conserved noncoding elements (CNEs). Much evidence suggests that CNEs are selectively constrained and not mutational cold-spots, and there is evidence that some CNEs play a role in the regulation of development. Here, we quantify negative and positive selection acting in murine CNEs by analyzing within-species nucleotide variation and between-species divergence of CNEs that we identified using a phylogenetically independent comparison. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations in CNEs, inferred from within-species polymorphism, suggests that CNEs receive a higher number of strongly selected deleterious mutations and many fewer nearly neutral mutations than amino acid sites of protein-coding genes or regulatory elements close to genes. However, we also show that CNEs experience a far higher proportion of adaptive substitutions than any known category of genomic sites in murids. The absolute rate of adaptation of CNEs is similar to that of amino acid sites of proteins. This result suggests that there is widespread adaptation in mammalian conserved noncoding DNA elements, some of which have been implicated in the regulation of crucially important processes, including development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21478460     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  16 in total

1.  Disproportionate roles for the X chromosome and proteins in adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Contrasting Levels of Molecular Evolution on the Mouse X Chromosome.

Authors:  Erica L Larson; Dan Vanderpool; Sara Keeble; Meng Zhou; Brice A J Sarver; Andrew D Smith; Matthew D Dean; Jeffrey M Good
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Major role of positive selection in the evolution of conservative segments of Drosophila proteins.

Authors:  Georgii A Bazykin; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Variation in base-substitution mutation in experimental and natural lineages of Caenorhabditis nematodes.

Authors:  Dee R Denver; Larry J Wilhelm; Dana K Howe; Kristin Gafner; Peter C Dolan; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Contributions of protein-coding and regulatory change to adaptive molecular evolution in murid rodents.

Authors:  Daniel L Halligan; Athanasios Kousathanas; Rob W Ness; Bettina Harr; Lél Eöry; Thomas M Keane; David J Adams; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Purifying selection in deeply conserved human enhancers is more consistent than in coding sequences.

Authors:  Dilrini R De Silva; Richard Nichols; Greg Elgar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Abnormal dosage of ultraconserved elements is highly disfavored in healthy cells but not cancer cells.

Authors:  Ruth B McCole; Chamith Y Fonseka; Amnon Koren; C-Ting Wu
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  The evolution of ultraconserved elements with different phylogenetic origins.

Authors:  Taewoo Ryu; Loqmane Seridi; Timothy Ravasi
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Prevalence of multinucleotide replacements in evolution of primates and Drosophila.

Authors:  Nadezhda V Terekhanova; Georgii A Bazykin; Alexey Neverov; Alexey S Kondrashov; Vladimir B Seplyarskiy
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Genomic resources for wild populations of the house mouse, Mus musculus and its close relative Mus spretus.

Authors:  Bettina Harr; Emre Karakoc; Rafik Neme; Meike Teschke; Christine Pfeifle; Željka Pezer; Hiba Babiker; Miriam Linnenbrink; Inka Montero; Rick Scavetta; Mohammad Reza Abai; Marta Puente Molins; Mathias Schlegel; Rainer G Ulrich; Janine Altmüller; Marek Franitza; Anna Büntge; Sven Künzel; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 6.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.