Literature DB >> 21478387

Assessment of coronary artery remodelling by dual-source CT: a head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound.

Sören Gauss1, Stephan Achenbach, Tobias Pflederer, Annika Schuhbäck, Werner G Daniel, Mohamed Marwan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While it is widely assumed that coronary CT angiography permits detection and quantification of 'positive remodelling' of coronary atherosclerotic lesions, there is a paucity of data comparing CT with established reference methods.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of dual-source CT for detecting positive versus absent or negative coronary artery remodelling of coronary atherosclerotic lesions as compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
METHODS: The datasets were evaluated of 38 patients referred for invasive coronary angiography and in whom an IVUS study of one coronary vessel was performed. Coronary CT angiography was performed within 24 h before invasive coronary angiography. Using dual-source CT (Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany), a contrast-enhanced volume dataset was acquired (120 kV, 400 mA/rot, collimation 2×64×0.6 mm, 60-80 ml contrast agent, intravenous). IVUS was performed using a 40 MHz IVUS catheter (Atlantis, Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, Massachusetts, USA) and motorised pullback at 0.5 mm/s. 48 corresponding non-calcified and partially calcified plaques within the coronary artery system were identified in both CT and IVUS using bifurcation points as fiducial markers. In CT datasets, multiplanar reconstructions orthogonal to the centre line of the coronary artery were rendered and cross-sectional vessel area was measured at the site of maximal narrowing as well as at a reference segment proximal to the lesion for each of the 48 plaques. The remodelling index (RI) was calculated by dividing the vessel area at the site of maximal narrowing by the area of the reference segment. Corresponding vessel areas and RIs were also determined in IVUS.
RESULTS: CT classified 41 plaques as positively remodelled (RI≥1.05) and seven as having either absent or negative remodelling (RI<1.05). In IVUS 29 plaques demonstrated positive remodelling, while 19 did not. Mean cross-sectional vessel areas measured by CT at the lesion and at the reference segment were 19±5 mm(2) and 17± 5 mm(2), respectively, versus 18±5 mm(2) and 17±5 mm(2) for IVUS (mean difference 1±2 mm(2) and -0.2±1 mm(2), p<0.0001 and 0.8, respectively). The mean RI in CT was significantly larger than in IVUS (1.2±0.2 vs 1.1±0.2, p<0.0001). Correlation between CT and IVUS was higher for vessel area measurements (r>0.9, p<0.0001) than for remodelling indices (r=0.7, p<0.0001) with Bland-Altman analysis showing a systematic overestimation of vessel areas and RI in CT. Interobserver agreement was moderate for CT and IVUS measurements. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a RI of 1.1 in CT identified positively remodelled plaques in IVUS with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 78% (area under the curve=0.8, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.0). Using the standard cut-off point of 1.05 to identify positively remodelled plaques in CT resulted in a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 45%.
CONCLUSION: Coronary CT angiography allows analysis of coronary artery remodelling. The degree of positive remodelling is typically overestimated by CT. A threshold of 1.1 for the RI may be optimal to classify plaques as 'positively remodelled' in coronary CT angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21478387     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2011.223024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  21 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of coronary heart disease by CT angiography: current and evolving applications.

Authors:  Abhishek Sharma; Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Comprehensive plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Maros Ferencik; Szilard Voros; Béla Merkely; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Epicardial adipose tissue is associated with high-risk plaque feature progression in non-culprit lesions.

Authors:  Yahang Tan; Jia Zhou; Ying Zhou; Xiaobo Yang; Jing Wang; Yundai Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  High-risk plaque detected on coronary CT angiography predicts acute coronary syndromes independent of significant stenosis in acute chest pain: results from the ROMICAT-II trial.

Authors:  Stefan B Puchner; Ting Liu; Thomas Mayrhofer; Quynh A Truong; Hang Lee; Jerome L Fleg; John T Nagurney; James E Udelson; Udo Hoffmann; Maros Ferencik
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Cardiac CT Imaging of Plaque Vulnerability: Hype or Hope?

Authors:  Martin J Willemink; Tim Leiner; Pál Maurovich-Horvat
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Plaque imaging with CT-a comprehensive review on coronary CT angiography based risk assessment.

Authors:  Márton Kolossváry; Bálint Szilveszter; Béla Merkely; Pál Maurovich-Horvat
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-10

7.  Use of High-Risk Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Detection for Risk Stratification of Patients With Stable Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Maros Ferencik; Thomas Mayrhofer; Daniel O Bittner; Hamed Emami; Stefan B Puchner; Michael T Lu; Nandini M Meyersohn; Alexander V Ivanov; Elizabeth C Adami; Manesh R Patel; Daniel B Mark; James E Udelson; Kerry L Lee; Pamela S Douglas; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 8.  CT Imaging of the Vulnerable Plaque.

Authors:  Gary R Small; Benjamin J W Chow
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-11-06

9.  Computed tomography-based high-risk coronary plaque score to predict acute coronary syndrome among patients with acute chest pain--Results from the ROMICAT II trial.

Authors:  Maros Ferencik; Thomas Mayrhofer; Stefan B Puchner; Michael T Lu; Pal Maurovich-Horvat; Ting Liu; Khristine Ghemigian; Pieter Kitslaar; Alexander Broersen; Fabian Bamberg; Quynh A Truong; Christopher L Schlett; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2015-07-10

10.  Coronary CT Angiography as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool: Perspective from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: PROMISE.

Authors:  Daniel O Bittner; Maros Ferencik; Pamela S Douglas; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.