OBJECTIVE: To validate the prognostic relevance of lymph node density (LND) and identify its optimal cut-points in a large international multicenter series of patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for invasive bladder cancer. METHODS: From 1993 to 2005, 4,430 bladder cancer patients who underwent RC without neoadjuvant chemotherapy were reviewed; of these, 1,038 were pN+M0 disease and form the basis of this report. RESULTS: Median age of patients was 67 years with median follow-up in survivors of 33 months. Overall, 5-year DSS estimate was 36%. Median number of lymph nodes removed was 18 (IQR, 11-32), median number of positive lymph nodes was 2 (IQR, 1-5), and median LND was 14.3% (IQR, 6.67-33.3%). LND as continuous variable was a stronger prognostic factor for DSS in patients that underwent a more extensive PLND (P < 0.001). HR for inverse association of LND with DSS increased incrementally with increasing LND cut-points. Categorizing LND into quintiles revealed strong tertiary distribution of risk based on LND <6%, 6%-41%, or >41% with cumulative 5-year DSS of 47%, 36%, and 21%, respectively (P < 0.001). When patients were stratified by adjuvant chemotherapy, LND remains independently prognostic in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy as well as those who did not. CONCLUSION: Lymph node density is prognostic in bladder cancer patients who undergo a more extensive PLND and remains prognostic even when adjuvant chemotherapy is used. Prognostic value of LND is best represented as a continuum of risk and LND <6% represents the best possible outcome in patients with nodal disease.
OBJECTIVE: To validate the prognostic relevance of lymph node density (LND) and identify its optimal cut-points in a large international multicenter series of patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for invasive bladder cancer. METHODS: From 1993 to 2005, 4,430 bladder cancerpatients who underwent RC without neoadjuvant chemotherapy were reviewed; of these, 1,038 were pN+M0 disease and form the basis of this report. RESULTS: Median age of patients was 67 years with median follow-up in survivors of 33 months. Overall, 5-year DSS estimate was 36%. Median number of lymph nodes removed was 18 (IQR, 11-32), median number of positive lymph nodes was 2 (IQR, 1-5), and median LND was 14.3% (IQR, 6.67-33.3%). LND as continuous variable was a stronger prognostic factor for DSS in patients that underwent a more extensive PLND (P < 0.001). HR for inverse association of LND with DSS increased incrementally with increasing LND cut-points. Categorizing LND into quintiles revealed strong tertiary distribution of risk based on LND <6%, 6%-41%, or >41% with cumulative 5-year DSS of 47%, 36%, and 21%, respectively (P < 0.001). When patients were stratified by adjuvant chemotherapy, LND remains independently prognostic in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy as well as those who did not. CONCLUSION: Lymph node density is prognostic in bladder cancerpatients who undergo a more extensive PLND and remains prognostic even when adjuvant chemotherapy is used. Prognostic value of LND is best represented as a continuum of risk and LND <6% represents the best possible outcome in patients with nodal disease.
Authors: Lars Weisbach; Roland Dahlem; Giuseppe Simone; Jens Hansen; Armin Soave; Oliver Engel; Felix K Chun; Shahrokh F Shariat; Margit Fisch; Michael Rink Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2013-07-25 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: L S Mertens; R P Meijer; E van Werkhoven; A Bex; H G van der Poel; B W van Rhijn; W Meinhardt; S Horenblas Journal: World J Urol Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Amanda F Saltzman; Derek E Smith; Dexiang Gao; Debashis Ghosh; Arya Amini; Jennifer H Aldrink; Roshni Dasgupta; Kenneth W Gow; Richard D Glick; Peter F Ehrlich; Nicholas G Cost Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Bassel G Bachir; Armen G Aprikian; Yves Fradet; Joseph L Chin; Jonathan Izawa; Ricardo Rendon; Eric Estey; Adrian Fairey; Ilias Cagiannos; Louis Lacombe; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; David Bell; Fred Saad; Darrel Drachenberg; Wassim Kassouf Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Thomas Horn; Sebastian C Schmid; Anna K Seitz; Jessica Grab; Petra Wolf; Bernhard Haller; Margitta Retz; Tobias Maurer; Michael Autenrieth; Hubert R Kübler; Jürgen E Gschwend Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Lu Wang; Kumaran Mudaliar; Vikas Mehta; Güliz A Barkan; Marcus L Quek; Robert C Flanigan; Maria M Picken Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2014-04-04 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Marisa M Clifton; Sarah P Psutka; Stephen A Boorjian; John C Cheville; Prabin Thapa; R Houston Thompson; Matthew K Tollefson; R Jeffrey Karnes; Igor Frank Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 4.226