BACKGROUND: Characterization of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) genome has suggested that KRAS amplification is one of the commonest molecular abnormalities in NSCLC. However, the prevalence and clinicopathologic significance of KRAS amplification, and its relationship with KRAS activating mutations have not been well-defined. The purpose of this study was to establish the prevalence of KRAS amplification in two separate, large NSCLC cohorts, to define the clinicopathologic features of KRAS-amplified NSCLC in a single uniformly treated cohort, and to investigate the interplay between KRAS amplification and KRAS mutation. METHODS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization was utilized to detect KRAS amplification on tissue microarrays constructed from a Swiss cohort of 538 NSCLCs and a series of 402 patients with NSCLC treated in a single institution in New York. DNA sequencing to detect KRAS codon 12 activating mutations was performed on a subset of tumors. Amplification and mutation status were compared with patient baseline characteristics, tumor characteristics, and overall- and disease-free survival. RESULTS: The prevalence of KRAS amplification was 13.7% in the Swiss cohort and 15.1% in the New York cohort. Among adenocarcinomas, KRAS amplification was associated with larger (mean size 2.8±1.8 cm vs. 2.1±1.3 cm, p=0.003), less well-differentiated tumors (18% vs. 42%, p=0.004) that were more likely to be invasive (95% vs. 77%, p=0.004) and to exhibit angiolymphatic invasion (24% vs. 12%, p=0.04). These differences were statistically significant within the subset of adenocarcinomas harboring activating KRAS mutations, suggesting a synergistic relationship between amplification and mutation. No significant association between KRAS amplification and nodal metastasis or survival was seen. CONCLUSIONS: KRAS amplification is a common molecular alteration in NSCLC, characterizing ∼15% of tumors. This alteration is associated with indicators of local aggressiveness, and may act synergistically with KRAS mutations to promote tumor progression.
BACKGROUND: Characterization of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) genome has suggested that KRAS amplification is one of the commonest molecular abnormalities in NSCLC. However, the prevalence and clinicopathologic significance of KRAS amplification, and its relationship with KRAS activating mutations have not been well-defined. The purpose of this study was to establish the prevalence of KRAS amplification in two separate, large NSCLC cohorts, to define the clinicopathologic features of KRAS-amplified NSCLC in a single uniformly treated cohort, and to investigate the interplay between KRAS amplification and KRAS mutation. METHODS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization was utilized to detect KRAS amplification on tissue microarrays constructed from a Swiss cohort of 538 NSCLCs and a series of 402 patients with NSCLC treated in a single institution in New York. DNA sequencing to detect KRAS codon 12 activating mutations was performed on a subset of tumors. Amplification and mutation status were compared with patient baseline characteristics, tumor characteristics, and overall- and disease-free survival. RESULTS: The prevalence of KRAS amplification was 13.7% in the Swiss cohort and 15.1% in the New York cohort. Among adenocarcinomas, KRAS amplification was associated with larger (mean size 2.8±1.8 cm vs. 2.1±1.3 cm, p=0.003), less well-differentiated tumors (18% vs. 42%, p=0.004) that were more likely to be invasive (95% vs. 77%, p=0.004) and to exhibit angiolymphatic invasion (24% vs. 12%, p=0.04). These differences were statistically significant within the subset of adenocarcinomas harboring activating KRAS mutations, suggesting a synergistic relationship between amplification and mutation. No significant association between KRAS amplification and nodal metastasis or survival was seen. CONCLUSIONS:KRAS amplification is a common molecular alteration in NSCLC, characterizing ∼15% of tumors. This alteration is associated with indicators of local aggressiveness, and may act synergistically with KRAS mutations to promote tumor progression.
Authors: Muhan Chen; Dawid G Nowak; Navneet Narula; Brian Robinson; Kaitlin Watrud; Alexandra Ambrico; Tali M Herzka; Martha E Zeeman; Matthias Minderer; Wu Zheng; Saya H Ebbesen; Kendra S Plafker; Carlos Stahlhut; Victoria M Y Wang; Lorna Wills; Abu Nasar; Mireia Castillo-Martin; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; John E Wilkinson; Scott Powers; Raffaella Sordella; Nasser K Altorki; Vivek Mittal; Brendon M Stiles; Scott M Plafker; Lloyd C Trotman Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Jan Rehkaemper; Michael Korenkov; Alexander Quaas; Josef Rueschoff; Aylin Pamuk; Thomas Zander; Axel M Hillmer; Reinhard Buettner; Arnulf Heinrich Hoelscher; Christiane Josephine Bruns; Heike Loeser; Hakan Alakus; Birgid Schoemig-Markiefka Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Nitin Roper; Moises J Velez; Alberto Chiappori; Yoo Sun Kim; Jun S Wei; Sivasish Sindiri; Nobuyuki Takahashi; Deborah Mulford; Suresh Kumar; Kris Ylaya; Christopher Trindade; Irena Manukyan; Anna-Leigh Brown; Jane B Trepel; Jung-Min Lee; Stephen Hewitt; Javed Khan; Anish Thomas Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: E Birkeland; E Wik; S Mjøs; E A Hoivik; J Trovik; H M J Werner; K Kusonmano; K Petersen; M B Raeder; F Holst; A M Øyan; K-H Kalland; L A Akslen; R Simon; C Krakstad; H B Salvesen Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Elisabeth M P Steeghs; Leonie I Kroeze; Bastiaan B J Tops; Leon C van Kempen; Arja Ter Elst; Annemiek W M Kastner-van Raaij; Sandra J B Hendriks-Cornelissen; Mandy J W Hermsen; Erik A M Jansen; Petra M Nederlof; Ed Schuuring; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Astrid Eijkelenboom Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-04-07 Impact factor: 4.430