Literature DB >> 21477606

Category-sensitivity in the N170 range: a question of topography and inversion, not one of amplitude.

Stephan G Boehm1, Benjamin Dering, Guillaume Thierry.   

Abstract

Event-related potential studies have identified the N170 as the key neurophysiological marker of human face processing. This functional association relies on the observation of a larger N170 amplitude to faces than items from all other visual object categories. However, N170 amplitude is modulated by stimulus variations like viewpoint, size and symmetry, and studies comparing similarly sized and symmetric full-front faces and other objects have failed to find amplitude differences. Here we tested whether the effect of inversion - an increase in N170 amplitude seen for faces presented upside down - is similarly observed for full-front views of cars. Participants discriminated pictures of faces and cars, which were presented upright and inverted, and either in full-front view or varying in size, orientation and viewpoint. For upright stimuli, the N170 was stronger for faces than cars at some electrode sites, but of comparable amplitude at others, as shown by topographical differences. The N170 for inverted faces and cars was delayed, with a stronger delay for faces than cars. Inversion increased N170 amplitude for faces, while modulations for full-front view cars were non-significant or N170 amplitude was reduced. These results further limit the widely acknowledged principle of an association between N170 and visual object categorization. Potential face-sensitivity in the N170 range may therefore rely on topographic differences and effects of inversion, rather than amplitude differences.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21477606     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  8 in total

1.  Time-course of perceptual processing of "hole" and "no-hole" figures: an ERP study.

Authors:  Weina Zhu; Junjun Zhang; Changle Zhou
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 5.203

2.  Face-sensitive processes one hundred milliseconds after picture onset.

Authors:  Benjamin Dering; Clara D Martin; Sancho Moro; Alan J Pegna; Guillaume Thierry
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  The background of reduced face specificity of N170 in congenital prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Kornél Németh; Márta Zimmer; Stefan R Schweinberger; Pál Vakli; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Brain Activity Related to the Judgment of Face-Likeness: Correlation between EEG and Face-Like Evaluation.

Authors:  Yuji Nihei; Tetsuto Minami; Shigeki Nakauchi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  The Influence of Face Inversion and Spatial Frequency on the Self-Positive Expression Processing Advantage.

Authors:  Yueyang Yin; Yu Yuan; Lin Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-31

6.  Toward a unified model of face and object recognition in the human visual system.

Authors:  Guy Wallis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-15

7.  Dissociating Attention Effects from Categorical Perception with ERP Functional Microstates.

Authors:  Benjamin Dering; David I Donaldson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Neural dynamics of grip and goal integration during the processing of others' actions with objects: An ERP study.

Authors:  Jérémy Decroix; Clémence Roger; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.