Literature DB >> 21476802

Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study.

Frank L Acosta1, John Liu, Nicholas Slimack, David Moller, Richard Fessler, Tyler Koski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar interbody fusion is a minimal access technique that has been used by some to treat lumbar degenerative conditions, including degenerative scoliosis. Few studies, however, have analyzed its effect on coronal and sagittal plane correction, and no study has compared changes in segmental, regional, and global coronal and sagittal alignment after this technique. The object of this study was to determine changes in sagittal and coronal plane alignment occurring after direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF).
METHODS: The authors performed a review of the radiographic records of 36 patients with lumbar degenerative disease treated with the DLIF technique. Thirty-five patients underwent supplemental posterior fixation to maintain correction. Preoperative and postoperative standing anteroposterior and lateral lumbar radiographs were obtained in all patients for measurement of segmental and regional coronal and sagittal Cobb angles. Standing anteroposterior and lateral 36-in radiographs were also obtained in 23 patients for measurement of global coronal (center sacral vertebral line) and sagittal (C-7 plumb line) balance.
RESULTS: The mean coronal segmental Cobb angle was 4.5° preoperatively, and it was 1.5° postoperatively (p < 0.0001). The mean pre- and postoperative regional lumbar coronal Cobb angles were 7.6° and 3.6°, respectively (p = 0.0001). In 8 patients with degenerative scoliosis, the mean pre- and postoperative regional lumbar coronal Cobb angles were 21.4° and 9.7°, respectively (p = 0.0004). The mean global coronal alignment was 19.1 mm preoperatively, and it was 12.5 mm postoperatively (p < 0.05). In the sagittal plane, the mean segmental Cobb angle measured -5.3° preoperatively and -8.2° postoperatively (p < 0.0001). The mean pre- and postoperative regional lumbar lordoses were 42.1° and 46.2°, respectively (p > 0.05). The mean global sagittal alignment was 41.5 mm preoperatively and 42.4 mm postoperatively (p = 0.7). The average clinical follow-up was 21 months in 21 patients. The mean pre- and postoperative visual analog scale scores were 7.7 and 2.9, respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean pre- and postoperative Oswestry Disability Indices were 43 and 21, respectively (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Direct lateral interbody fusion significantly improves segmental, regional, and global coronal plane alignment in patients with degenerative lumbar disease. Although DLIF increases the segmental sagittal Cobb angle at the level of instrumentation, it does not improve regional lumbar lordosis or global sagittal alignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21476802     DOI: 10.3171/2011.3.SPINE10425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  59 in total

1.  Is the lateral transpsoas approach feasible for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis?

Authors:  Carlos Castro; Leonardo Oliveira; Rodrigo Amaral; Luis Marchi; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Surgical treatments for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a meta analysis.

Authors:  Guohua Wang; Jianzhong Hu; Xiangyang Liu; Yong Cao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Adult spinal deformity: effectiveness of interbody lordotic cages to restore disc angle and spino-pelvic parameters through completely mini-invasive trans-psoas and hybrid approach.

Authors:  Giuseppe Barone; Laura Scaramuzzo; Antonino Zagra; Fabrizio Giudici; Andrea Perna; Luca Proietti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  The role of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion in sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity.

Authors:  Giuseppe Costanzo; Carmine Zoccali; Philip Maykowski; Christina M Walter; Jesse Skoch; Ali A Baaj
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Role of minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity in preventing complications.

Authors:  Chun-Po Yen; Yusef I Mosley; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

Review 7.  Comparison of ALIF vs. XLIF for L4/5 interbody fusion: pros, cons, and literature review.

Authors:  Mark J Winder; Shanu Gambhir
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03

8.  Do position and size matter? An analysis of cage and placement variables for optimum lordosis in PLIF reconstruction.

Authors:  Priyan R Landham; Angus S Don; Peter A Robertson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Anterior to psoas (ATP) fusion of the lumbar spine: evolution of a technique facilitated by changes in equipment.

Authors:  Cristian Gragnaniello; Kevin Seex
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12

10.  Comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with direct lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological results.

Authors:  Young Seok Lee; Young Baeg Kim; Seung Won Park; Chan Chung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.