Literature DB >> 21475942

Defensive responses by a social caterpillar are tailored to different predators and change with larval instar and group size.

Melanie McClure1, Emma Despland.   

Abstract

Gregariousness in animals is widely accepted as a behavioral adaptation for protection from predation. However, predation risk and the effectiveness of a prey's defense can be a function of several other factors, including predator species and prey size or age. The objective of this study was to determine if the gregarious habit of Malacosoma disstria caterpillars is advantageous against invertebrate natural enemies, and whether it is through dilution or cooperative defenses. We also examined the effects of larval growth and group size on the rate and success of attacks. Caterpillars of M. disstria responded with predator-specific behaviors, which led to increased survival. Evasive behaviors were used against stinkbugs, while thrashing by fourth instar caterpillars and holding on to the silk mat by second instar caterpillars was most efficient against spider attacks. Collective head flicking and biting by groups of both second and fourth instar caterpillars were observed when attacked by parasitoids. Increased larval size decreased the average number of attacks by spiders but increased the number of attacks by both stinkbugs and parasitoids. However, increased body size decreased the success rate of attacks by all three natural enemies and increased handling time for both predators. Larger group sizes did not influence the number of attacks from predators but increased the number of attacks and the number of successful attacks from parasitoids. In all cases, individual risk was lower in larger groups. Caterpillars showed collective defenses against parasitoids but not against the walking predators. These results show that caterpillars use different tactics against different natural enemies. Overall, these tactics are both more diverse and more effective in fourth instar than in second instar caterpillars, confirming that growth reduces predation risk. We also show that grouping benefits caterpillars through dilution of risk, and, in the case of parasitoids, through group defenses. The decreased tendency to aggregate in the last larval instar may therefore be linked to decreasing predation risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21475942     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-011-0788-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  5 in total

1.  Invertebrate predator-prey body size relationships: an explanation for upper triangular food webs and patterns in food web structure?

Authors:  P H Warren; J H Lawton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The effects of different predator species on antipredator behavior in the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata.

Authors:  M S Botham; C J Kerfoot; V Louca; J Krause
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-08-01

3.  Geometry for the selfish herd.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication.

Authors:  R M Seyfarth; D L Cheney; P Marler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Temperature and food quality effects on growth, consumption and post-ingestive utilization efficiencies of the forest tent caterpillar Malacosoma disstria (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae).

Authors:  K R Levesque; K R Levesque; M Fortin; Y Mauffette
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.750

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  A field demonstration of the costs and benefits of group living to edible and defended prey.

Authors:  Edward A M Curley; Hannah E Rowley; Michael P Speed
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  The possible role of ant larvae in the defence against social parasites.

Authors:  Unni Pulliainen; Heikki Helanterä; Liselotte Sundström; Eva Schultner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Some sawfly larvae survive predator-prey interactions with pentatomid Picromerus bidens.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Boevé
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2021-02-03

4.  The role of semiochemicals in short-range location of aggregation sites in Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae).

Authors:  Eline C Susset; Felipe Ramon-Portugal; Jean-Louis Hemptinne; Sarah Y Dewhirst; Michael A Birkett; Alexandra Magro
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Head capsule stacking by caterpillars: morphology complements behaviour to provide a novel defence.

Authors:  Petah A Low; Clare McArthur; Dieter F Hochuli
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Gregariousness does not vary with geography, developmental stage, or group relatedness in feeding redheaded pine sawfly larvae.

Authors:  John W Terbot; Ryan L Gaynor; Catherine R Linnen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Transcriptome analysis of a social caterpillar, Drepana arcuata: De novo assembly, functional annotation and developmental analysis.

Authors:  Chanchal Yadav; Myron L Smith; Jayne E Yack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Plasticity of collective behavior in a nomadic early spring folivore.

Authors:  Emma Despland
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Invertebrate and avian predators as drivers of chemical defensive strategies in tenthredinid sawflies.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Boevé; Stephan M Blank; Gert Meijer; Tommi Nyman
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.260

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.