Literature DB >> 21475589

Complete genome sequence of Cellulophaga algicola type strain (IC166).

Birte Abt, Megan Lu, Monica Misra, Cliff Han, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Nancy Hammon, Shweta Deshpande, Jan-Fang Cheng, Roxane Tapia, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Ioanna Pagani, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Galina Ovchinikova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, John C Detter, Evelyne Brambilla, Manfred Rohde, Brian J Tindall, Markus Göker, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Alla Lapidus.   

Abstract

Cellulophaga algicola Bowman 2000 belongs to the family Flavobacteriaceae within the phylum 'Bacteroidetes' and was isolated from Melosira collected from the Eastern Antarctic coastal zone. The species is of interest because its members produce a wide range of extracellular enzymes capable of degrading proteins and polysaccharides with temperature optima of 20-30°C. This is the first completed genome sequence of a member of the genus Cellulophaga. The 4,888,353 bp long genome with its 4,285 protein-coding and 62 RNA genes consists of one circular chromosome and is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flavobacteriaceae; GEBA; Gram-negative; aerobic; agarolytic; chemoorganotrophic; cold adapted enzymes; motile by gliding

Year:  2011        PMID: 21475589      PMCID: PMC3072087          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1543845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain IC166T (= DSM 14237 = CIP 107446 = LMG 21425) is the type strain of C. algicola, which belongs to the family Flavobacteriaceae within the phylum 'Bacteroidetes'. The strain was isolated from the surface of the chain-forming sea-ice diatom Melosira collected from the Eastern Antarctic coastal zone, and was described by Bowman in 2000 [1]. Currently, there are six species placed in the genus Cellulophaga, namely C. algicola [1], C. baltica, C. fucicola, C. lytica [2], C. pacifica [3] and C. tyrosinoxydans [4]. C. lytica is the type species of the genus Cellulophaga [2]. The generic name of the genus derives from the Neo Latin word 'cellulosum' meaning 'cellulose' and the Greek word 'phagein' meaning 'to eat', referring to an eater of cellulose. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for C. algicola IC166T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of C. algicola was compared using NCBI BLAST under default settings (e.g., considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [5] and the relative frequencies, weighted by BLAST scores, of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stem [6]) were determined. The five most frequent genera were Cellulophaga (39.5%), Maribacter (7.8%), Flavobacterium (5.6%), Cytophaga (5.4%) and Formosa (4.7%) (135 hits in total). Regarding the 21 hits to sequences from members of the species, the average identity within HSPs was 95.8%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 94.9%. Regarding the 16 hits to sequences from other members of the genus, the average identity within HSPs was 94.7%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 94.7%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was C. baltica, which corresponded to an identity of 98.1% and a HSP coverage of 97.8%. The highest-scoring environmental sequence was GU452686 ('sediments coast oil polluted Black Sea coastal sediment clone 70SZ2'), which showed an identity of 96.5% and a HSP coverage of 98.1%. The five most frequent keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits were 'marin' (4.7%), 'water' (4.3%), 'sediment' (4.3%), 'sea' (3.5%) and 'coastal' (2.6%) (115 hits in total). Environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were not found. The environmental samples database (env_nt) contains the marine metagenome clone ctg_1101667042524 (AACY022635173) isolated from Sargasso Sea near Bermuda, sharing 92% identity with IC166T [7] (as of January 2011). Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of C. algicola IC166T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the five 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome differ from each other by up to two nucleotides, and differ by up to 14 nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (AF001366), which contains nine ambiguous base calls.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of C. algicola IC166T relative to the other type strains within the family Flavobacteriaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,458 aligned characters [8,9] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [10] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 350 bootstrap replicates [11] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [12] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of C. algicola IC166T relative to the other type strains within the family Flavobacteriaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,458 aligned characters [8,9] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [10] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 350 bootstrap replicates [11] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [12] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold. The cells of C. algicola are generally rod-shaped with rounded or tapered ends with cell lengths and widths ranging from 1.5 to 4 and 0.4 to 0.5 µm, respectively (Figure 2 and Table 1). C. algicola is motile by gliding [1]. Colonies on marine 2216 agar have yellow-orange pigmentation and a compact center, with a spreading edge possessing lighter pigmentation. Their consistency is slimy and they are slightly sunken into the agar [1]. Flexirubin pigments are not formed. C. algicola grows between 0.5 and 10% NaCl, with the best growth in the presence of about 2% NaCl. The temperature range for growth is between -2°C and 28°C, with an optimum between 15-20°C on solid media and at about 20-25°C in liquid media [1]. The optimal pH for growth is about 7.5 [1].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of C. algicola IC166T

Table 1

Classification and general features of C. algicola IC166T according to the MIGS recommendations [13].

MIGS ID    Property   Term    Evidence code
    Current classification   Domain Bacteria    TAS [14]
   Phylum Bacteroidetes    TAS [15,16]
   Class Flavobacteria    TAS [17]
   Order 'Flavobacteriales'    TAS [15]
   Family Flavobacteriaceae    TAS [18-21]
   Genus Cellulophaga    TAS [2]
   Species Cellulophaga algicola    TAS [1]
   Type strain IC166    TAS [1]
    Gram stain   negative    TAS [1]
    Cell shape   rod-shaped    TAS [1]
    Motility   motile by gliding    TAS [1]
    Sporulation   none    TAS [1]
    Temperature range   -2 °C – 28°C    TAS [1]
    Optimum temperature   20°C    TAS [1]
    Salinity   0.5-10% NaCl    TAS [1]
MIGS-22    Oxygen requirement   aerobic    TAS [1]
    Carbon source   carbohydrates    TAS [1]
    Energy source   chemoheterotroph    TAS [1]
MIGS-6    Habitat   sea ice diatoms, macrophyte surfaces    TAS [1]
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship   free-living    NAS
MIGS-14    Pathogenicity   none    NAS
    Biosafety level   1    TAS [22]
    Isolation   surfaces of Antarctic algae    TAS [1]
MIGS-4    Geographic location   eastern Antarctic coastal zone    TAS [1]
MIGS-5    Sample collection time   1996    NAS
MIGS-4.1    Latitude   not reported    NAS
MIGS-4.2    Longitude   not reported    NAS
MIGS-4.3    Depth   not reported    NAS
MIGS-4.4    Altitude   not reported    NAS

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [23]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Scanning electron micrograph of C. algicola IC166T Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [23]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements. The organism is strictly aerobic and chemoorganotrophic [1]. C. algicola can hydrolyze agar, starch, gelatine, carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), casein, Tween 80, tributyrin and L-tyrosine, but not urate, xanthine or dextran, when grown in presence of 1% L-tyrosine a reddish-brown diffusible pigment is formed [1]. Nitrate reduction is positive, whereas denitrification, H2S production and indole production are negative [1,18]. Acid is formed oxidatively from D-galactose, D-glucose, D-fructose, sucrose, cellobiose, lactose and mannitol. Strain IC166T is sensitive to ampicillin, streptomycin and carbenicillin and shows resistance to tetracycline [3].

Chemotaxonomy

The fatty acid profile of seven Antarctic strains, including strain IC166T, was analyzed by Bowman in 2000 [1]. The hypothetical median representative of the Antarctic isolates was published. The predominant cellular fatty acids of these seven strains were branched-chain saturated and unsaturated fatty acids and straight-chain saturated and mono-unsaturated fatty acids, namely iso-C15:0 (7.5%), iso-C15:1ω10c (7.5%), iso -C17:1ω7c (6.1%), C15:0 (14.3%), C16:1ω7c (19.2%), iso -C15:0 3-OH (8.6%), iso-C16:0 3-OH (6.5%) and iso -C17:0 3-OH (4.5%) [1]. The isoprenoid quinones of C. algicola were not determined, but for C. pacifica the presence of MK-6 as the major lipoquinone was described [3]. Polar lipids not have been studied.

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [24], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [25]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [12] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID     Property      Term
MIGS-31     Finishing quality      Finished
MIGS-28     Libraries used      Three genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library,       one 454 PE library (12 kb insert size), one Illumina library
MIGS-29     Sequencing platforms      Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX Titanium
MIGS-31.2     Sequencing coverage      146.0 × Illumina; 53.5 × pyrosequence
MIGS-30     Assemblers      Newbler version 2.0.00.20-PostRelease-10-28-2008-g-3.4.6,       Velvet version 0.7.63, phrap version SPS D 4.24
MIGS-32     Gene calling method      Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
     INSDC ID      CP002453
     Genbank Date of Release      January 18, 2011
     GOLD ID      Gc01592
     NCBI project ID      41529
     Database: IMG-GEBA      2503904003
MIGS-13     Source material identifier      DSM 14237
     Project relevance      Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

C. algicola IC166T, DSM 14237, was grown in DSMZ medium 514 (BACTO marine broth) [26] at 15°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram-positive DNA purification kit (Epicentre MGP04100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer with modification st/DL for cell lysis as described in Wu et al. [25]. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [27].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [28]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 2.3-PreRelease-09-14-2009-bin (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisting of 128 contigs in two scaffolds was converted into a phrap assembly by [29] making fake reads from the consensus, to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (710 Mb) was assembled with Velvet [30] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 263.4Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [29] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution [28], Dupfinisher [31], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F.Chang, unpublished). A total of 1,054 additional reactions and three shatter libraries were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [32]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 199.5 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 697,305 pyrosequence and 20,331,123 Illumina reads

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [33] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [34]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [35].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 4,888,353 bp long chromosome with a GC content of 33.8% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 4,347 genes predicted, 4,285 were protein-coding genes, and 62 RNAs; 122 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (59.5%) were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute    Value     % of Total
Genome size (bp)    4,888,353     100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)    4,301,528     88.00%
DNA G+C content (bp)    1,650,610     33.77%
Number of replicons    1
Extrachromosomal elements    0
Total genes    4,347     100.00%
RNA genes    62     1.43%
rRNA operons    5
Protein-coding genes    4,285     98.57%
Pseudo genes    122     2.81%
Genes with function prediction    2,587     59.51%
Genes in paralog clusters    698     16.06%
Genes assigned to COGs    2,539     58.41%
Genes assigned Pfam domains    2,822     64.92%
Genes with signal peptides    1,220     28.07%
Genes with transmembrane helices    1,010     23.23%
CRISPR repeats    0
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code    value    %age      Description
J    160    5.8      Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    0    0.0      RNA processing and modification
K    174    6.3      Transcription
L    147    5.4      Replication, recombination and repair
B    1    0.0      Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    20    0.7      Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y    0    0.0      Nuclear structure
V    63    2.3      Defense mechanisms
T    167    6.1      Signal transduction mechanisms
M    239    8.7      Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N    7    0.3      Cell motility
Z    0    0.0      Cytoskeleton
W    0    0.0      Extracellular structures
U    41    1.5      Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O    99    3.6      Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    135    4.9      Energy production and conversion
G    172    6.3      Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    208    7.6      Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    70    2.6      Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    131    4.8      Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    97    3.5      Lipid transport and metabolism
P    174    6.3      Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    52    1.9      Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    345    12.6      General function prediction only
S    247    9.0      Function unknown
-    1,808    41.6      Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Insights from genome sequence

A closer look on the genome sequence of strain IC166T revealed a set of genes which might be responsible for the yellow-orange color of C. algicola cells by encoding enzymes that are involved in the synthesis of carotenoids. Carotenoids are produced by the action of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase (Celal_1770), phytoene synthase (Celal_2446), phytoene desaturase (Celal_2447), lycopene cyclase (Celal_1771) and carotene hydroxylase (Celal_2445). Geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthases start the biosynthesis of carotenoids by combining farnesyl pyrophosphate with C5 isoprenoid units to C20-molecules, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate. The phytoene synthase catalyzes the condensation of two geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate molecules followed by the removal of diphosphate and a proton shift leading to the formation of phytoene. Sequential desaturation steps are conducted by the phytoene desaturase followed by cyclisation of the ends of the molecules catalyzed by the lycopene cyclase [36]. Strain IC166T produces a wide range of extracellular enzymes degrading proteins and polysaccharides. These enzymes are cold adapted, they have temperature optima between 15-30°C and can tolerate temperatures below 0°C [37]. For that reason they are of special interest for industrial and biotechnical applications. C. algicola like the other members of the genus Cellulophaga, cannot hydrolyze filter paper or cellulose in its crystalline form, though they can hydrolyze the soluble cellulose derivative carboxymethylcellulose (CMC). The genome sequence of strain IC166T revealed the presence of three cellulases (Celal_0025, Celal_2753, Celal_3912), probably responsible for the hydrolysis of CMC. In addition two β-glucosidases (Celal_0470, Celal_1802) were identified in the genome, catalyzing the break down of the glycosidic β-1,4 bond between two glucose molecules in cellobiose. The IC166T genome contains 22 genes coding for sulfatases, which are located in close proximity to glycoside hydrolase genes suggesting that sulfated polysaccharides may be used as substrates. α-L-fucoidan could be a substrate, as five α-L-fucosidases (Celal_2459, Celal_2466, Celal_2469, Celal_2470, Celal_2473) are located in close proximity to three sulfatases (Celal_2464, Celal_2468, Celal_2472). Sakai and colleagues report the existence of intracellular α-L-fucosidases and sulfatases, which enable 'Fucophilus fucoidanolyticus' to degrade fucoidan [38]. This fucoidan degrading ability could be also shared by Coraliomargarita akajimensis, as the annotation of the genome sequence revealed the existence of 49 sulfatases and twelve α-L-fucosidases [39]. In addition, three β-agarases (Celal_2463, Celal_2494, Celal_3979) were identified, with two of them located in the above mentioned region, which is rich in genes encoding glycoside hydrolases and sulfatases.
  27 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Bernardet; Yasuyoshi Nakagawa; Barry Holmes
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. List No. 40.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1992-01

Review 7.  Carotenoid biosynthesis and biotechnological application.

Authors:  G Sandmann
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 4.013

8.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Cellulophaga pacifica sp. nov.

Authors:  Olga I Nedashkovskaya; Makoto Suzuki; Anatoly M Lysenko; Cindy Snauwaert; Marc Vancanneyt; Jean Swings; Mikhail V Vysotskii; Valery V Mikhailov
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.747

10.  Complete genome sequence of Coraliomargarita akajimensis type strain (04OKA010-24).

Authors:  Konstantinos Mavromatis; Birte Abt; Evelyne Brambilla; Alla Lapidus; Alex Copeland; Shweta Deshpande; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Cliff Han; John C Detter; Tanja Woyke; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Brittany Held; Thomas Brettin; Roxanne Tapia; Natalia Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Konstantinos Liolios; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Hans-Peter Klenk; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-06-15
View more
  12 in total

1.  On the role, ecology, phylogeny, and structure of dual-family immunophilins.

Authors:  Sailen Barik
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Draft Genome Sequence of Newly Isolated Agarolytic Bacteria Cellulophaga omnivescoria sp. nov. W5C Carrying Several Gene Loci for Marine Polysaccharide Degradation.

Authors:  Kris Niño G Valdehuesa; Kristine Rose M Ramos; Llewelyn S Moron; Imchang Lee; Grace M Nisola; Won-Keun Lee; Wook-Jin Chung
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  The mannitol utilization system of the marine bacterium Zobellia galactanivorans.

Authors:  Agnès Groisillier; Aurore Labourel; Gurvan Michel; Thierry Tonon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Gliding motility and Por secretion system genes are widespread among members of the phylum bacteroidetes.

Authors:  Mark J McBride; Yongtao Zhu
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Complete genome sequence of Cellulophaga lytica type strain (LIM-21).

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Birte Abt; Hazuki Teshima; Matt Nolan; Alla Lapidus; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxane Tapia; Cliff Han; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Galina Ovchinikova; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Cynthia D Jeffries; John C Detter; Evelyne-Marie Brambilla; K Palani Kannan; Manfred Rohde; Stefan Spring; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Natalia Ivanova
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2011-04-29

6.  Complete Genome Sequence of Cellulophaga lytica HI1 Using PacBio Single-Molecule Real-Time Sequencing.

Authors:  Audrey Y Asahina; Michael G Hadfield
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2014-11-06

7.  Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes.

Authors:  Richard L Hahnke; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Marina García-López; Supratim Mukherjee; Marcel Huntemann; Natalia N Ivanova; Tanja Woyke; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Markus Göker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Glitter-like iridescence within the bacteroidetes especially Cellulophaga spp.: optical properties and correlation with gliding motility.

Authors:  Betty Kientz; Adrien Ducret; Stephen Luke; Peter Vukusic; Tâm Mignot; Eric Rosenfeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genomic and phenotypic insights into the ecology of Arthrobacter from Antarctic soils.

Authors:  Melissa Dsouza; Michael W Taylor; Susan J Turner; Jackie Aislabie
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Gene Expression Analysis of Zobellia galactanivorans during the Degradation of Algal Polysaccharides Reveals both Substrate-Specific and Shared Transcriptome-Wide Responses.

Authors:  François Thomas; Philippe Bordron; Damien Eveillard; Gurvan Michel
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.