Literature DB >> 21475573

The benefit and efficiency of the disease management program for type 2 diabetes.

Roland Linder1, Susanne Ahrens, Dagmar Köppel, Thomas Heilmann, Frank Verheyen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Euro 1.1 billion were spent in 2009 for disease management programs (DMPs) in Germany, among them the DMP for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Earlier studies of DMPs failed to take sufficient account of patient- and physician-related selection effects. We used innovative methods to study the medical benefit of the DMP for T2DM among insurees of the Techniker Krankenkasse, a German health insurance provider.
METHODS: For this study, we analyzed claims data of the Techniker Krankenkasse from 2006 to 2008. We developed and implemented a sophisticated control group design based on propensity score interval matching. We considered a large number of variables in the baseline assessment, including socio-economic parameters, comorbidities, levels of nursing care, drug expenses, and hospital expenses.
RESULTS: The DMP participants did not differ from the control group with respect to the incidence of relevant comorbidities. They underwent emergency hospitalization somewhat less frequently than the control group and also generated lower costs for inpatient treatment. In every three-month period studied, the DMP participants received more prescriptions, had more contacts with physicians in private practice, and submitted higher claims for health insurance benefits than the control group.
CONCLUSION: The current DMP for T2DM in Germany is not adequately effective. This study does not reveal any clear medical benefit from DMP participation. Selection effects were largely eliminated by means of a sophisticated control group design. Analyses of other DMPs with this method are currently being planned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21475573      PMCID: PMC3071961          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  3 in total

1.  [Evaluation of disease management programmes--assessing methods and initial outcomes from a health economic perspective].

Authors:  Dana Sophie Birnbaum; Sebastian Braun
Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes       Date:  2010

2.  Is there a survival benefit within a German primary care-based disease management program?

Authors:  Antje Miksch; Gunter Laux; Dominik Ose; Stefanie Joos; Stephen Campbell; Burgi Riens; Joachim Szecsenyi
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  The disease management program for type 2 diabetes in Germany enhances process quality of diabetes care - a follow-up survey of patient's experiences.

Authors:  Ingmar Schäfer; Claudia Küver; Benjamin Gedrose; Falk Hoffmann; Barbara Russ-Thiel; Hans-Peter Brose; Hendrik van den Bussche; Hanna Kaduszkiewicz
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total
  24 in total

1.  Correspondence (letter to the editor): Sponsor bias.

Authors:  Peter T Sawicki
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Correspondence (letter to the editor): An unbiased approach is necessary.

Authors:  Joachim Szecsenyi
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Correspondence (letter to the editor): Collective was not representative.

Authors:  Lutz Altenhofen; Bernd Hagen; Jens Kretschmann; Sabine Groos; Dominik Graf von Stillfried
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Correspondence (reply): In Reply.

Authors:  Roland Linder; Susanne Ahrens; Frank Verheyen; Dagmar Köppel; Thomas Heilmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Correspondence (letter to the editor): Matching should take place before the start of the study.

Authors:  Anna Drabik; Markus Lüngen; Stephanie Stock; Christian Graf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Correspondence (letter to the editor): Quo Vadis, Techniker Krankenkasse?

Authors:  Gerhard Heinsch
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Correspondence (letter to the editor): Incidence has fallen.

Authors:  Ernst Chantelau
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  In reply.

Authors:  Rainer Riedel; Verena Hendricks
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Efficiency of physician specialist groups.

Authors:  Lukas Kwietniewski; Jonas Schreyögg
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2017-02-28

Review 10.  Disease management programs for type 2 diabetes in Germany: a systematic literature review evaluating effectiveness.

Authors:  Sabine Fuchs; Cornelia Henschke; Miriam Blümel; Reinhard Busse
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.