Literature DB >> 21475013

Hospital variation in 30-day mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in denmark: the contribution of hospital volume and patient characteristics.

Merete Osler1, Lene H Iversen, Anders Borglykke, Solvej Mårtensson, Signe Daugbjerg, Henrik Harling, Torben Jørgensen, Birgitte Frederiksen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examines variation between hospitals in 30-day mortality after surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Denmark and explores whether hospital volume and patient characteristics contribute to any variation between hospitals.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the variation between hospitals in 30-day mortality after CRC surgery, and the impact of treatment and patient characteristics that might contribute to such variation.
METHODS: Hospital variation was quantified using a multilevel approach on data derived from a nationwide database of all adenocarcinomas of colon and rectum diagnosed in Denmark in 2001 to 2004. These data were linked to several central registers providing information on patient's socioeconomic status, comorbidity, and use of medication. In total 11,287 patients, who underwent surgery at any of the 43 surgical departments were included.
RESULTS: Hospitals varied from 3.5% to 44.1% in 30-day mortality after emergency colon cancer surgery, and the multilevel analysis showed that emergency patients were 5 times [odd ratio (OR) = 4.6)] as likely to die within 30 days in hospitals with the worst performance compared to those with the best performance. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score increased the variation between hospitals (OR = 5.8), whereas the other potential explanatory variables had no effect on the variation. For patients who had elective surgery for colon and rectal cancer the variation in 30-day mortality between hospitals was small and nonsignificant.
CONCLUSION: Hospital variation in 30-day mortality after CRC surgery are due to differences in hospitals' ability to take care of emergency patients, especially those with high ASA scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21475013     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318207556f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  17 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopy vs open colectomy among nonmetastatic colon cancer patients: an analysis using the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Zheng; Ahmedin Jemal; Chun Chieh Lin; Chung-Yuan Hu; George J Chang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Risk model for right hemicolectomy based on 19,070 Japanese patients in the National Clinical Database.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Kobayashi; Hiroaki Miyata; Mitsukazu Gotoh; Hideo Baba; Wataru Kimura; Yuko Kitagawa; Tohru Nakagoe; Mitsuo Shimada; Naohiro Tomita; Kenichi Sugihara; Masaki Mori
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  The DGAV risk calculator: development and validation of statistical models for a web-based instrument predicting complications of colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Alexander Crispin; Carsten Klinger; Anna Rieger; Brigitte Strahwald; Kai Lehmann; Heinz-Johannes Buhr; Ulrich Mansmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer: the influence of hospital volume on complications and length of stay.

Authors:  Atsuhiko Murata; Kohji Okamoto; Keiji Muramatsu; Shinya Matsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Impact of hospital volume on outcomes after emergency management of obstructive colon cancer: a nationwide study of 1957 patients.

Authors:  Mathilde Aubert; Diane Mege; Gilles Manceau; Valérie Bridoux; Zaher Lakkis; Aurélien Venara; Thibault Voron; Solafah Abdalla; Laura Beyer-Berjot; Igor Sielezneff; Charles Sabbagh; Mehdi Karoui
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The current status of emergency operations at a high-volume cancer center.

Authors:  Koji Komori; Kenya Kimura; Takashi Kinoshita; Seiji Ito; Tetsuya Abe; Yoshiki Senda; Kazunari Misawa; Yuichi Ito; Norihisa Uemura; Seiji Natsume; Ryosuke Kawai; Jiro Kawakami; Tomonari Asano; Yoshinori Iwata; Shintaro Kurahashi; Masayuki Tsutsuyama; Itaru Shigeyoshi; Yasuhiro Shimizu
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

7.  Mortality after emergency treatment of colorectal cancer and associated risk factors-a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Thea Helene Degett; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton; Jane Christensen; Jes Søgaard; Lene Hjerrild Iversen; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Can only chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy treatment be applied to patients with rectal cancer who could not be operated?

Authors:  Dogan Koca; Ilhan Oztop; Ugur Yilmaz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-06

9.  Treatment of perforated colon carcinomas-outcomes of radical surgery.

Authors:  M Daniels; S Merkel; A Agaimy; W Hohenberger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Colon cancer operations at high- and low-mortality hospitals.

Authors:  Mark A Healy; Tyler R Grenda; Pasithorn A Suwanabol; Huiying Yin; Amir A Ghaferi; John D Birkmeyer; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.