Literature DB >> 21473931

In vitro genotoxicity test approaches with better predictivity: summary of an IWGT workshop.

Stefan Pfuhler1, Mick Fellows, Jan van Benthem, Raffaella Corvi, Rodger Curren, Kerry Dearfield, Paul Fowler, Roland Frötschl, Azeddine Elhajouji, Ludovic Le Hégarat, Toshio Kasamatsu, Hajime Kojima, Gladys Ouédraogo, Andrew Scott, Günter Speit.   

Abstract

Improving current in vitro genotoxicity tests is an ongoing task for genetic toxicologists. Further, the question on how to deal with positive in vitro results that are demonstrated to not predict genotoxicity or carcinogenicity potential in rodents or humans is a challenge. These two aspects were addressed at the 5th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) held in Basel, Switzerland, on August 17-19, 2009. The objectives of the working group (WG) were to make recommendations on the use of cell types or lines, if possible, and to provide evaluations of promising new approaches. Results obtained in rodent cell lines with impaired p53 function (L5178Y, V79, CHL and CHO cells) and human p53-competent cells (peripheral blood lymphocytes, TK6 and HepG2 cells) suggest that a reduction in the percentage of non-relevant positive results for carcinogenicity prediction can be achieved by careful selection of cells used without decreasing the sensitivity of the assays. Therefore, the WG suggested using p53- competent - preferably human - cells in in vitro micronucleus or chromosomal aberration tests. The use of the hepatoma cell line HepaRG for genotoxicity testing was considered promising since these cells possess better phase I and II metabolizing potential compared to cell lines commonly used in this area and may overcome the need for the addition of S9. For dermally applied compounds, the WG agreed that in vitro reconstructed skin models, once validated, will be useful to follow up on positive results from standard in vitro assays as they resemble the properties of human skin (barrier function, metabolism). While the reconstructed skin micronucleus assay has been shown to be further advanced, there was also consensus that the Comet assay should be further evaluated due to its independence from cell proliferation and coverage of a wider spectrum of DNA damage.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21473931     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  16 in total

Review 1.  How virus persistence can initiate the tumorigenesis process.

Authors:  Simone Avanzi; Gualtiero Alvisi; Alessandro Ripalti
Journal:  World J Virol       Date:  2013-05-12

Review 2.  Hypothesis-based weight-of-evidence evaluation and risk assessment for naphthalene carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Lisa A Bailey; Marc A Nascarella; Laura E Kerper; Lorenz R Rhomberg
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Rationale for further medical and health research on high-potency sweeteners.

Authors:  Susan S Schiffman
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Validation of the hen's egg test for micronucleus induction (HET-MN): detailed protocol including scoring atlas, historical control data and statistical analysis.

Authors:  Katrin Maul; Dagmar Fieblinger; Andreas Heppenheimer; Juergen Kreutz; Manfred Liebsch; Andreas Luch; Ralph Pirow; Albrecht Poth; Pamela Strauch; Eva Dony; Markus Schulz; Thorsten Wolf; Kerstin Reisinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.954

5.  Comet assay in reconstructed 3D human epidermal skin models--investigation of intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility with coded chemicals.

Authors:  Astrid A Reus; Kerstin Reisinger; Thomas R Downs; Gregory J Carr; Andreas Zeller; Raffaella Corvi; Cyrille A M Krul; Stefan Pfuhler
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Combining Different In Vitro Bioassays to Evaluate Genotoxicity of Water-Accommodated Fractions from Petroleum Products.

Authors:  Sarah Johann; Mira Goßen; Peter A Behnisch; Henner Hollert; Thomas-Benjamin Seiler
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2020-06-26

7.  Cytome micronucleus assays with a metabolically competent human derived liver cell line (Huh6): A promising approach for routine testing of chemicals?

Authors:  Miroslav Mišík; Armen Nersesyan; Claudia Bolognesi; Michael Kundi; Franziska Ferk; Siegfried Knasmueller
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 8.  Sucralose, a synthetic organochlorine sweetener: overview of biological issues.

Authors:  Susan S Schiffman; Kristina I Rother
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.393

9.  Application of the TGx-28.65 transcriptomic biomarker to classify genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells in the presence of rat liver S9.

Authors:  Carole L Yauk; Julie K Buick; Andrew Williams; Carol D Swartz; Leslie Recio; Heng-Hong Li; Albert J Fornace; Errol M Thomson; Jiri Aubrecht
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  Use of HuH6 and other human-derived hepatoma lines for the detection of genotoxins: a new hope for laboratory animals?

Authors:  Monika Waldherr; Miroslav Mišík; Franziska Ferk; Jana Tomc; Bojana Žegura; Metka Filipič; Wolfgang Mikulits; Sören Mai; Oskar Haas; Wolfgang W Huber; Elisabeth Haslinger; Siegfried Knasmüller
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.