Literature DB >> 21472973

Spray drift as influenced by meteorological and technical factors.

Tommy Arvidsson1, Lars Bergström, Jenny Kreuger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate spray drift from a conventional field sprayer as influenced by meteorological and technical factors, and to provide spray operators with data on which to base sound judgements when applying pesticides. The study was conducted in grazing fields and cereal crops.
RESULTS: Interpreting the results from 15 field trials under varying meteorological conditions using different boom heights and driving speeds indicates that, during normal spraying conditions, the most decisive factors influencing the total spray drift (TSD) will be boom height and wind speed, followed by air temperature, driving speed and vapour pressure deficit. One important finding was that TSD (within the encompassed range of meteorological conditions and a boom height of 0.4 m) could be expressed as a simple function of the fraction of droplets ≤ 100 µm. In cereal crops: TSD = 0.36 + 0.11× [fr. (d ≤ 100 µm)] and in grazing fields, TSD = 1.02 + 0.10× [fr. (d ≤ 100 µm)]. In most cases a fraction of the airborne drift passed over the 6 m sampling mast located 5 m downwind of the spray swath.
CONCLUSIONS: Under specified conditions, the present results indicate a simple relation between the total spray drift and volume fractions of droplets ≤ 100 µm. Given the nozzle type, it was concluded that the most decisive factors determining TSD are wind speed and boom height. Evaluating the relative importance of the meteorological and technical factors contributes to increasing knowledge in this field of research.
Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21472973     DOI: 10.1002/ps.2114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pest Manag Sci        ISSN: 1526-498X            Impact factor:   4.845


  5 in total

1.  Residual behavior and risk assessment of the mixed formulation of benzene kresoxim-methyl and fluazinam in cucumber field application.

Authors:  Quansheng Wang; Peng Wei; Mengchao Cao; Yanan Liu; Mengcen Wang; Yirong Guo; Guonian Zhu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Pesticide regulatory risk assessment, monitoring, and fate studies in the northern zone: recommendations from a Nordic-Baltic workshop.

Authors:  Marianne Stenrød; Marit Almvik; Ole Martin Eklo; Anne Louise Gimsing; Roger Holten; Kai Künnis-Beres; Mats Larsbo; Linas Putelis; Katri Siimes; Inara Turka; Jaana Uusi-Kämppä
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Factors affecting aerial spray drift in the Brazilian Cerrado.

Authors:  Fabio Henrique Rojo Baio; Ulisses Rocha Antuniassi; Bruno Rodeguer Castilho; Paulo Eduardo Teodoro; Eder Eujácio da Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Spray drift evaluation with point clouds data of 3D LiDAR as a potential alternative to the sampling method.

Authors:  Longlong Li; Ruirui Zhang; Liping Chen; Boqin Liu; Linhuan Zhang; Qing Tang; Chenchen Ding; Zhen Zhang; Andrew J Hewitt
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Use of a terrestrial LIDAR sensor for drift detection in vineyard spraying.

Authors:  Emilio Gil; Jordi Llorens; Jordi Llop; Xavier Fàbregas; Montserrat Gallart
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.