Literature DB >> 21472760

Bounding the bias of unmeasured factors with confounding and effect-modifying potentials.

Wen-Chung Lee1.   

Abstract

Confounding is a major concern in observational studies. To adjust for confounding bias, the potential confounder(s) for a study must first be identified and measured. But this is not always possible. The unmeasured factors may also exhibit effect modification, and this further complicates the situation. In this paper, the author derives bounding formulas for the bias of unmeasured factors with confounding and effect-modifying potentials. Based on these formulas, the author derives two conditions (for the unmeasured factors) to explain away an observed positive finding: the low-threshold (for the minimum of two parameters related to the unmeasured factors) and the high-threshold (for the maximum) conditions. All these should help researchers make more prudent interpretations of their (potentially biased) results.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21472760     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

1.  Sulfonylurea use and incident cardiovascular disease among patients with type 2 diabetes: prospective cohort study among women.

Authors:  Yanping Li; Yang Hu; Sylvia H Ley; Swapnil Rajpathak; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Cardiovascular Risk Associated with Methotrexate versus Retinoids in Patients with Psoriasis: A Nationwide Taiwanese Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ming-Hsueh Tsai; Tom C Chan; Meng-Sui Lee; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Evaluation of Confounding and Selection Bias in Epidemiological Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation.

Authors:  Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Elisabeth Cardis; Dominique Laurier; Jay H Lubin; Michael Hauptmann; David B Richardson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

4.  Increased association between endometriosis and endometrial cancer: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hann-Chin Yu; Chun-Yi Lin; Wei-Chiao Chang; Biing-Jiun Shen; Wei-Pin Chang; Chi-Mu Chuang
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions.

Authors:  Peng Ding; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Healthy lifestyle and life expectancy free of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yanping Li; Josje Schoufour; Dong D Wang; Klodian Dhana; An Pan; Xiaoran Liu; Mingyang Song; Gang Liu; Hyun Joon Shin; Qi Sun; Laila Al-Shaar; Molin Wang; Eric B Rimm; Ellen Hertzmark; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett; Oscar H Franco; Frank B Hu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-01-08

7.  Joint association between birth weight at term and later life adherence to a healthy lifestyle with risk of hypertension: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yanping Li; Sylvia H Ley; Tyler J VanderWeele; Gary C Curhan; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Walter C Willett; John P Forman; Frank B Hu; Lu Qi
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Detecting and correcting the bias of unmeasured factors using perturbation analysis: a data-mining approach.

Authors:  Wen-Chung Lee
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  A proxy outcome approach for causal effect in observational studies: a simulation study.

Authors:  Wenbin Liang; Yuejen Zhao; Andy H Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.