Literature DB >> 21471854

Evidence to inform decisions about maternal-fetal surgery: technical brief.

Katherine E Hartmann1, Melissa L McPheeters, Nancy C Chescheir, Maria Gillam-Krakauer, J Nikki McKoy, Rebecca Jerome, Nila A Sathe, Laura Meints, William F Walsh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the state of research in maternal-fetal surgery regarding the surgical repair of abnormalities in fetuses in the womb. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE from 1980 to 2010 for studies of maternal-fetal surgery for the following conditions: twin-twin transfusion syndrome, obstructive uropathy, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, myelomeningocele, thoracic lesions, cardiac malformations, and sacrococcygeal teratoma. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We used pilot-tested data collection forms to screen publications for inclusion and to extract data. We compiled information about how fetal diagnoses were defined, maternal inclusion criteria, type of surgery, study design, country, setting, comparators used, length of follow-up, outcomes measured, and adverse events. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND
RESULTS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and discordance was resolved by a third party. Of 1,341 articles located, we retained 258 (comprising 166 unique study populations). Three studies were randomized controlled trials; the majority of the evidence was observational (116 case series [70%], 36 retrospective [22%], and 11 prospective [7%] cohorts). Twin-twin transfusion is the most studied condition, with 84 studies including 2,532 pregnancies. Fewer than 500 pregnancies are represented in the literature for each of the other conditions except congenital diaphragmatic hernia (n=503). Inclusion criteria were poorly specified. Outcomes typically measured were survival to birth, preterm birth, and neonatal death. Longer-term outcomes were sparse but included pulmonary, renal, and neurologic status and developmental milestones. Maternal outcome data were rare.
CONCLUSION: Although developing rapidly, maternal-fetal surgery research has yet to achieve the typical quality of studies and aggregate strength of evidence needed to optimally inform care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21471854     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318216151d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  2 in total

Review 1.  Understanding Sociodemographic Disparities in Maternal-Fetal Surgery Study Participation.

Authors:  Abigail Wilpers; Anna Y Lynn; Barbara Eichhorn; Amy B Powne; Megan Lagueux; Janene Batten; Mert Ozan Bahtiyar; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.208

2.  Prenatal ultrasound and magnetic resonance evaluation and fetal outcome in high-risk fetal tumors: A retrospective single-center cohort study over 20 years.

Authors:  Barbara Ulm; Dana Muin; Anke Scharrer; Daniela Prayer; Gregor Dovjak; Gregor Kasprian
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.544

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.