Literature DB >> 21471795

Clinical factors for distinguishing perforated from nonperforated appendicitis: a comparison using multidetector computed tomography in 528 laparoscopic appendectomies.

Suk Won Suh1, Yoo Shin Choi, Joong Min Park, Beom Gyu Kim, Seong Jae Cha, Sung Jun Park, In Taik Chang.   

Abstract

The accurate and early diagnosis of perforated appendicitis (PA) is important when a surgeon is making decisions with regard to time and method of operation that are critical in reducing morbidity and mortality. A total of 528 laparoscopic appendectomies were investigated with the review of data. Clinical factors for identifying PA and a comparison using computed tomography (CT) (prominent role in detection of appendicitis despite of its high cost) were done. Among the clinical factors, total duration of the symptoms before admission (cutoff value: 24.51 h, sensitivity/specificity 0.51/0.65) and highly selective C-reactive protein levels (cutoff value: 9.52 mg/L, sensitivity/specificity 0.80/0.69) had significance on PA (P=0.001) compared with the performance of CT (sensitivity/specificity 0.28/0.99). The total duration of the symptoms before admission and highly selective C-reactive protein levels were respectable predictors of PA compared with those when using CT, showing that it could be another diagnostic tool for identifying PA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21471795     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31820e762c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  6 in total

1.  Scoring system for differentiating perforated and non-perforated pediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Einat Blumfield; Daniel Yang; Joshua Grossman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-07-07

2.  Delta neutrophil index: A reliable marker to differentiate perforated appendicitis from non-perforated appendicitis in the elderly.

Authors:  Dong Hyuk Shin; Young Suk Cho; Yoon Sung Kim; Hee Cheol Ahn; Young Taeck Oh; Sang O Park; Moo-Ho Won; Jun Hwi Cho; Young Myeong Kim; Jeong Yeol Seo; Young Hwan Lee
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Antibiotics as first-line therapy for acute appendicitis: evidence for a change in clinical practice.

Authors:  Jeanette Hansson; Ulla Körner; Karin Ludwigs; Erik Johnsson; Claes Jönsson; Kent Lundholm
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults.

Authors:  Bo Rud; Thomas S Vejborg; Eli D Rappeport; Johannes B Reitsma; Peer Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-19

5.  Long-Term Results Following Antibiotic Treatment of Acute Appendicitis in Adults.

Authors:  K Lundholm; J Hansson-Assarsson; C Engström; B-M Iresjö
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Discriminating complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis by ultrasound imaging, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  W J Bom; M D Bolmers; S L Gans; C C van Rossem; A A W van Geloven; P M M Bossuyt; J Stoker; M A Boermeester
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-03-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.