Literature DB >> 21471672

Atrial tachycardia during ongoing atrial fibrillation ablation. - EnSite array analysis-.

Yasutsugu Nagamoto1, Takeshi Tsuchiya, Koji Miyamoto, Takanori Yamaguchi, Naohiko Takahashi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrial tachycardia (AT) occurring during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is sometimes difficult to identify and eliminate. EnSite Array (EA) visualizes beat-to-beat virtual activation of AT. The aim of the present study was to characterize AT occurring during AF ablation during ongoing AF, using EA. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Among 90 patients with AF (paroxysmal, n=67; persistent, n=23) who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation during ongoing AF, 33 (37%) had 46 ATs that developed during ablation, and 9 (10%) of these patients had 9 ATs that developed before ablation. AT was sustained in 39 and non-sustained in 7. Nineteen ATs resulted from a focal mechanism and 27 from macroreentry. The major AT foci were distributed in the pulmonary vein (n = 8) and left atrial roof (n = 3), and macroreentrant ATs mainly consisted of peri-mitral AT (n = 10), common atrial flutter (n = 10), and roof reentrant AT (n = 3). After EA-guided ablation of AT, 41 ATs in 28 patients (85%) were eventually rendered non-inducible. During 21 ± 8 months of follow-up, 30 of the 33 patients (91%) were free from AF/AT recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: AT occurred in 37% of the patients during ongoing AF ablation, resulting from a focal or reentrant mechanism in diverse locations. Peri-mitral AT, common atrial flutter, and AT from the pulmonary vein were frequently observed. These ATs were eliminated by EA-guided radiofrequency ablation in most cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21471672     DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the Anterior Septal Line and Mitral Isthmus Line for Perimitral Atrial Flutter Ablation Using Robotic Magnetic Navigation.

Authors:  Shipeng Dang; Ru-Xing Wang; Christian Jons; Peter Karl Jacobsen; Steen Pehrson; Xu Chen
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.279

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.