Literature DB >> 21471653

Association between changes in abdominal and lumbar multifidus muscle thickness and clinical improvement after spinal manipulation.

Shane L Koppenhaver1, Julie M Fritz, Jeffrey J Hebert, Greg N Kawchuk, John D Childs, Eric C Parent, Norman W Gill, Deydre S Teyhen.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective case series.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between improved disability and changes in abdominal and lumbar multifidus (LM) thickness using ultrasound imaging following spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) in patients with low back pain (LBP).
BACKGROUND: Although there is a growing body of literature demonstrating physiologic effects following the application of SMT, few studies have attempted to correlate these changes with clinically relevant outcomes.
METHODS: Eighty-one participants with LBP underwent 2 thrust SMT treatments and 3 assessment sessions within 1 week. Transversus abdominis (TrA), internal oblique (IO), and LM muscle thickness was assessed during each session, using ultrasound imaging of the muscles at rest and during submaximal contractions. The Modified Oswestry Disability Index was used to quantify participants' improvement in LBP-related disability. Stepwise hierarchical multiple linear regression and repeated-measures analysis of variance were performed to examine the multivariate relationship between change in muscle thickness and clinical improvement over time.
RESULTS: After controlling for the effects of age, sex, and body mass index, change in contracted LM muscle thickness was predictive of improved disability at 1 week (P = .02). As expected, larger increases in contracted LM muscle thickness at 1 week were associated with larger improvements in LBP-related disability. Contrary to our hypothesis, significant decreases in both contracted TrA and IO muscle thickness were observed immediately following SMT; but these changes were transient and unrelated to whether participants experienced clinical improvements.
CONCLUSION: These findings provide evidence that clinical improvement following SMT is associated with increased thickening of the LM muscle during a submaximal task. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis, level 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21471653     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  21 in total

Review 1.  Potential mechanisms for lumbar spinal stiffness change following spinal manipulative therapy: a scoping review.

Authors:  Peter Jun; Isabelle Pagé; Albert Vette; Greg Kawchuk
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2020-03-23

Review 2.  Spinal manipulative therapy and somatosensory activation.

Authors:  J G Pickar; P S Bolton
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Preliminary investigation of the mechanisms underlying the effects of manipulation: exploration of a multivariate model including spinal stiffness, multifidus recruitment, and clinical findings.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Shane L Koppenhaver; Gregory N Kawchuk; Deydre S Teyhen; Jeffrey J Hebert; John D Childs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The evaluation of lumbar multifidus muscle function via palpation: reliability and validity of a new clinical test.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Hebert; Shane L Koppenhaver; Deydre S Teyhen; Bruce F Walker; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Lumbopelvic manipulation in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Michael S Crowell; Nancy H Wofford
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-08

6.  Long-term lumbar multifidus muscle atrophy changes documented with magnetic resonance imaging: a case series.

Authors:  Mark Woodham; Andrew Woodham; Joseph G Skeate; Michael Freeman
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2014-05-31

7.  Association between history and physical examination factors and change in lumbar multifidus muscle thickness after spinal manipulation in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Shane L Koppenhaver; Julie M Fritz; Jeffrey J Hebert; Greg N Kawchuk; Eric C Parent; Norman W Gill; John D Childs; Deydre S Teyhen
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.368

8.  Differential patient responses to spinal manipulative therapy and their relation to spinal degeneration and post-treatment changes in disc diffusion.

Authors:  Arnold Y L Wong; Eric C Parent; Sukhvinder S Dhillon; Narasimha Prasad; Dino Samartzis; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Development of a Clinical Decision Aid for Chiropractic Management of Common Conditions Causing Low Back Pain in Veterans: Results of a Consensus Process.

Authors:  Robert D Vining; Zacariah K Shannon; Stacie A Salsbury; Lance Corber; Amy L Minkalis; Christine M Goertz
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Subgrouping patients with low back pain: a treatment-based approach to classification.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Hebert; Shane L Koppenhaver; Bruce F Walker
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.