BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI have high sensitivity and specificity for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD). No studies, however, have demonstrated how MRI can distinguish CJD from nonprion causes of rapidly progressive dementia (npRPD). We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for CJD compared to a cohort of npRPD subjects. METHODS: Two neuroradiologists blinded to diagnosis assessed DWI and FLAIR images in 90 patients with npRPD (n = 29) or prion disease (sporadic CJD [sCJD], n = 48, or genetic prion disease [familial CJD, n = 6, and Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker, n = 7]). Thirty-one gray matter regions per hemisphere were assessed for abnormal hyperintensities. The likelihood of CJD was assessed using our previously published criteria. RESULTS: Gray matter hyperintensities (DWI > FLAIR) were found in all sCJD cases, with certain regions preferentially involved, but never only in limbic regions, and rarely in the precentral gyrus. In all sCJD cases with basal ganglia or thalamic DWI hyperintensities, there was associated restricted diffusion (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] map). This restricted diffusion, however, was not seen in any npRPD cases, in whom isolated limbic hyperintensities (FLAIR > DWI) were common. One reader's sensitivity and specificity for sCJD was 94% and 100%, respectively, the other's was 92% and 72%. After consensus review, the readers' combined MRI sensitivity and specificity for sCJD was 96% and 93%, respectively. Familial CJD had overlapping MRI features with sCJD. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of FLAIR/DWI hyperintensity and restricted diffusion can differentiate sCJD from other RPDs with a high sensitivity and specificity. MRI with DWI and ADC should be included in sCJD diagnostic criteria. New sCJD MRI criteria are proposed.
BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI have high sensitivity and specificity for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD). No studies, however, have demonstrated how MRI can distinguish CJD from nonprion causes of rapidly progressive dementia (npRPD). We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for CJD compared to a cohort of npRPD subjects. METHODS: Two neuroradiologists blinded to diagnosis assessed DWI and FLAIR images in 90 patients with npRPD (n = 29) or prion disease (sporadic CJD [sCJD], n = 48, or genetic prion disease [familial CJD, n = 6, and Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker, n = 7]). Thirty-one gray matter regions per hemisphere were assessed for abnormal hyperintensities. The likelihood of CJD was assessed using our previously published criteria. RESULTS: Gray matter hyperintensities (DWI > FLAIR) were found in all sCJD cases, with certain regions preferentially involved, but never only in limbic regions, and rarely in the precentral gyrus. In all sCJD cases with basal ganglia or thalamic DWI hyperintensities, there was associated restricted diffusion (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] map). This restricted diffusion, however, was not seen in any npRPD cases, in whom isolated limbic hyperintensities (FLAIR > DWI) were common. One reader's sensitivity and specificity for sCJD was 94% and 100%, respectively, the other's was 92% and 72%. After consensus review, the readers' combined MRI sensitivity and specificity for sCJD was 96% and 93%, respectively. Familial CJD had overlapping MRI features with sCJD. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of FLAIR/DWI hyperintensity and restricted diffusion can differentiate sCJD from other RPDs with a high sensitivity and specificity. MRI with DWI and ADC should be included in sCJD diagnostic criteria. New sCJD MRI criteria are proposed.
Authors: Donald A Collie; David M Summers; Robin J Sellar; James W Ironside; Sarah Cooper; Martin Zeidler; Richard Knight; Robert G Will Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Alexander P Auchus; Christopher P L H Chen; Swati N Sodagar; Melissa Thong; Eugene C S Sng Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2002-11-15 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Aneesh B Singhal; Michael C Newstein; Ronald Budzik; Jang-Ho Cha; Guy Rordorf; Ferdinando S Buonanno; Michael A Panzara Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Y Shiga; K Miyazawa; S Sato; R Fukushima; S Shibuya; Y Sato; H Konno; K Doh-ura; S Mugikura; H Tamura; S Higano; S Takahashi; Y Itoyama Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-08-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: I Zerr; K Kallenberg; D M Summers; C Romero; A Taratuto; U Heinemann; M Breithaupt; D Varges; B Meissner; A Ladogana; M Schuur; S Haik; S J Collins; Gerard H Jansen; G B Stokin; J Pimentel; E Hewer; D Collie; P Smith; H Roberts; J P Brandel; C van Duijn; M Pocchiari; C Begue; P Cras; R G Will; P Sanchez-Juan Journal: Brain Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Mee-Ohk Kim; Leonel T Takada; Katherine Wong; Sven A Forner; Michael D Geschwind Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 10.005
Authors: Kyle Hurth; Rawan Tarawneh; Nupur Ghoshal; Tammie L S Benzinger; David B Clifford; Michael Geschwind; John C Morris; James E Galvin; Robert E Schmidt; Nigel J Cairns Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2015 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Leonel T Takada; Mee-Ohk Kim; Ross W Cleveland; Katherine Wong; Sven A Forner; Ignacio Illán Gala; Jamie C Fong; Michael D Geschwind Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.568