Literature DB >> 2147122

Oral contraceptives and breast cancer. Review and meta-analysis.

I Romieu1, J A Berlin, G Colditz.   

Abstract

To evaluate the relation between use of oral contraceptives and the incidence of breast cancer, the authors reviewed the epidemiologic literature and used quantitative methods to summarize the data. Study results for any use of oral contraceptives were pooled using a model that accounted for both interstudy and intrastudy variability. The authors also explored interstudy variability and modeled a duration-effect relation between oral contraceptive use and breast cancer. Case-control and follow-up studies were considered separately. Overall, the authors observed no increase in the risk of breast cancer for women who had ever used oral contraceptives, even after a long duration of use. These results were consistent across study design. However, data combined from case-control studies revealed a statistically significant positive trend (P = 0.001) in the risk of premenopausal breast cancer for women exposed to oral contraceptives for longer duration. This risk was predominant among women who used oral contraceptives for at least 4 years before their first term pregnancy (relative risk = 1.72; 95% confidence interval = 1.36 to 2.19). Additional study is required to determine whether this finding in a subgroup of exposed women is confirmed and whether the risk remains increased with advancing age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2147122     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19901201)66:11<2253::aid-cncr2820661102>3.0.co;2-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  16 in total

1.  Mortality associated with oral contraceptive use. Confounding might have accounted for results.

Authors:  A Szarewski; H C Kitchener
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-07

2.  Induced abortion as an independent risk factor for breast cancer.

Authors:  M Blettner; J Chang-Claude; T Scheuchenpflug
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  Prescribing oral contraceptives.

Authors:  E Weisberg
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Exogenous hormone use and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: results from The Netherlands Cohort Study.

Authors:  A G Schuurman; P A van den Brandt; R A Goldbohm
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 5.  Sex hormones, hormonal interventions, and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Constanza Camargo; Yasuyuki Goto; Jovanny Zabaleta; Douglas R Morgan; Pelayo Correa; Charles S Rabkin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Quality of systematic reviews of observational nontherapeutic studies.

Authors:  Tatyana Shamliyan; Robert L Kane; Stacy Jansen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 7.  Estrogen replacement therapy in women at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  R Vassilopoulou-Sellin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Oral contraceptive use among young women in southern Sweden.

Authors:  J Ranstam; H Olsson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer in older women (New Zealand).

Authors:  C Paul; D C Skegg; G F Spears
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 10.  Contraceptive steroids and the mammary gland: is there a hazard?--Insights from animal studies.

Authors:  G R Rutteman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.